throbber
From: Siddiqui, Saqib <SSiddiqui@mayerbrown.com>
`Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 5:48:37 PM
`To: Trials
`Cc: Rosenthal, Brian A.; Patrick Zuili
`Subject: CBM2016-00021 & CBM2016-00022 - request for authorization to file motion
`
`
`
`Honorable Patent Trial and Appeal Board:
`
`
`
`Petitioner in cases CBM2016-0021 and -0022 hereby requests authorization to file a motion under 37
`C.F.R. § 42.5(c)(2) for an extension of Due Date 4 or in the alternative under 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(c)(3) to
`excuse Petitioner’s filing of its Request for Oral Argument that was due on December 22, 2016 but was
`filed 11 hours late on the morning of December 23, 2016 (Paper No. 34).
`
`
`
`Petitioner intends to demonstrate that good cause exists for the relief sought. While Petitioner
`acknowledges it missed the deadline, the reason for the missed deadline was that lead counsel for
`Petitioner (Saqib Siddiqui) was called home unexpectedly on the afternoon of December 22 to care for
`his two-year-old son in view of a medical emergency with his mother-in-law, and in the ensuing
`commotion neglected to file the already-prepared request until the following morning. Petitioner is
`prepared to elaborate on the details of these events (including supporting medical documentation) in
`the requested motion.
`
`
`
`Petitioner also notes that it previously emailed the Board on December 23, 2016 informally requesting
`that the Board accept the late filing. This course of action was recommended by PTAB supervisory
`paralegal Andrew Kellogg. On the morning of December 23, Mr. Kellogg called Mr. Siddiqui regarding
`another matter related to these petitions. Mr. Siddiqui advised Mr. Kellogg of the late filings and asked
`whether a motion should be filed to rectify the situation. Mr. Kellogg advised that the late filing was
`very likely not going to be an issue, that no such motion should be necessary and that instead an
`informal email should resolve the issue. The Board denied the request on December 27 (Paper No. 35).
`Thus, Petitioner now seeks authorization to file a formal motion, given the gravity of the situation and
`the prejudice that would result to Petitioner if it does not obtain the requested relief.
`
`
`
`Petitioner also intends to demonstrate in the requested motion that no prejudice will result by granting
`Petitioner relief from the missed deadline. Patent Owner cannot claim prejudice from receiving the
`Request for Oral Argument 11 hours after it was due. This is especially true where Patent Owner
`already contemplated that a hearing would take place in these petitions because he requested Judges
`
`

`
`Easthom, Daniels and White consolidate the hearings with that of CBM2016-0008 during a call on
`November 16, 2016.
`
`
`
`Petitioner also notes that Patent Owner has repeatedly been excused from compliance with various
`PTAB rules in these proceedings, including when Patent Owner missed the deadline to file objections to
`evidence. While of course Petitioner recognizes that Patent Owner is acting pro se and does not expect
`the same accommodations, it would seem unfair and contrary to the goal of adjudicating this petition on
`the merits to deny Petitioner the relief it seeks given the nature and circumstances of Petitioner’s non-
`compliance here.
`
`
`
`As such, Petitioner requests authorization to file a motion so that it can fully set forth the basis for an
`extension or in the alternative for relief from missing Due Date 4.
`
`
`
`Petitioner is available at any time in December or the first week of January for a call to discuss the
`subject of this email.
`
`
`
`Best regards,
`
`Saqib Siddiqui
`
`
`
`Saqib J. Siddiqui
`
`Attorney at Law
`
`Mayer Brown, LLP
`
`1999 K Street Northwest, Washington, DC 20006
`
`Tel:+1-202-263-3167 | Cell:+1-202-664-3528 | SSiddiqui@mayerbrown.com |
`http://www.mayerbrown.com/
`
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________________
`
`

`
`
`
`This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
`whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If
`you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket