throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_______________
`
`MONSTER WORLDWIDE, INC., INDEED, INC. and
`THELADDERS.COM, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CAREER DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`________________
`
`Case CBM2014-00070
`Patent 8,374,901
`
`_______________
`
`Filed: February 12, 2014
`
`
`
`DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`
`
`
`I, David L. Marcus, declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney duly authorized to practice law in the States of
`
`Missouri, Kansas and Arizona. I am a partner at the law firm Bartle & Marcus
`
`

`

`LLC. I have personal knowledge of the facts contained hereto and, if called as a
`
`witness, could and would competently testify thereto.
`
`2.
`
`I have been retained to assist in the representation of the Patent
`
`Owner, Career Destination Development, LLC, in this matter. My business
`
`address is Bartle & Marcus LLC, 1100 Main Street, Suite 2730, Kansas City,
`
`Missouri 64105. My residence address is 9100 West 156th Place, Overland Park,
`
`Kansas 66221.
`
`3.
`
`I was admitted before the following courts on the dates
`
`indicated:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`Supreme Court of Missouri:
`
`Supreme Court of Kansas:
`
`Supreme Court of Arizona:
`
`d. Western District of Missouri:
`
`Eastern District of Missouri:
`
`District of Kansas:
`
`
`
`Eastern District of Wisconsin:
`
`Northern District of Texas:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10/4/1996
`
`4/25/1997
`
`1/18/2013
`
`10/21/1996
`
`7/8/2009
`
`4/24/1997
`
`4/4/2008
`
`11/17/2010
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`j.
`
`Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals:
`
`3/20/2009
`
`Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals:
`
`
`10/2/2011
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`4.
`
`I am presently in good standing and eligible to practice before
`
`the courts listed above, and have never been suspended or disbarred in any court. I
`
`have never had sanctions or contempt citations imposed on me by any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I am currently admitted pro hac vice to appear before the Patent
`
`Trial and Appeal Board in Case Nos. IPR2014-00110, IPR2014-00111 and
`
`IPR2014-00395. I have never been denied admission pro hac vice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`The attorney of record for Patent Owner, Career Destination
`
`Development, LLC, in this case with whom I will be associated is:
`
`James J. Kernell, Reg. No. 42720
`
`ERICKSON KERNELL DERUSSEAU & KLEYPAS, LLC
`
`8900 State Line Road, Suite 500
`
`Leawood, Kansas 66206
`
`Telephone: 913-549-4700
`
`Facsimile: 913-549-4646
`
`Email: jjk@kcpatentlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`7.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of
`
`37 C.F.R. If this motion is granted, I understand I will be subject to the USPTO
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`8.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding
`
`and have knowledge of the facts set forth in the Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission.
`
`9.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
`
`correct, and that this Declaration is made this 6th day of March 2014.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________
`David L. Marcus
`
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket