throbber
Indictmenthr 54 DAUnitUB GJ Suite 4310C
`In the Circuit Court 0f the State of Oregon
`'ZZZCQ 565% (O
`For Multnomah County
`Court Nbr
`Crime Report
`
`CLAS 20-70046
`
`DA 245 0204-1
`
`STATE OF OREGON
`
`Plaintifi',
`
`V.
`
`RICHARD JOHN CHENEY
`DOB: 08/04/1972
`
`Indictment for Violation of
`
`0R3 475.890 (1,2,3)
`ORS 811.540 (4,7)
`ORS 811.140 (5)
`ORS 163.195 (6)
`
`Fit—E1
`
`JUL 2 5 2022
`CiRCUiT COURT
`OREGON
`MULTNOi'f-AH COUNTY
`
`Defendant(s).
`The above-named defendant(s) are accused by the Grand Jury of Multnomah County, State of Oregon, by this indictment of crime(s) of COUNT
`1,2,3 UNLAWFUL DELIVERY 0F WTHAMPHETAMINE, COUNT 4 - FELONY FLEEING OR ATTEMPTlNG TO ELUDE A POLICE
`- RECKLESS DRIVING, COUNT 6 - RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING ANOTHER PERSON, COUNT 7 —
`OFFICER, COUNT 5
`IVIISDENEEANOR FLEEING OR ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE A POLICE OFFICER, committed as follows:
`
`UNLAWFUL DELIVERY 0F METHAMPHETAMINE
`The said Defendant(s), RICHARD JOHN CHENEY, on or about February 28, 2020,
`in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon, did
`unlawfully and intentionally and knowingly deliver METHAMPHETAMINE, contrary to the statutes in such eases made and provided and against
`the peace and dignity of the State of Oregon,
`The state further alleges that the above—described delivery involved substantial quantities of a controlled substance, consisting of 10 or
`more grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of METHAMPHETAMmE, its salts, isomers or salts of its isomers;
`This count is connected together by two or more acts or transactions with the other counts of this charging instrument. This count is of
`the same and similar character as the conduct alleged 1n the other counts of this charging instrument. This count constitutes part of a common
`scheme or plan based on two or more acts or transactions with the other counts of this charging instrument.
`COUNT2
`UNLAWFUL DELIVERY 0F METHAMPHETAMINE
`The said Defendant(s), RICHARD JOHN CHENEY, on or about March 05, 2020, in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon, did unlawfully
`and intentionally and knowingly deliver METHAWHETAMTNE, contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided and against the peace
`and dignity of the State of Oregon,
`The state filrther alleges that the above-described delivery involved substantial quantities of a controlled substance, consisting of 10 or
`more grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of METHAWHETAMINE, its salts, isomers or salts of 1ts isomers;
`This count is connected together by two or more acts or transactions with the other counts of this charging instrument. This count is of
`the same and similar character as the conduct alleged in the other counts of this charging instrument. This count constitutes part of a common
`scheme or plan based on two or more acts or transactions with the other counts of this charging instrument.
`
`'
`
`COUNT 3
`UNLAWFUL DELIVERY OF METHAMPHETAMINE
`The said Defendant(s), RICHARD JOHN CHENEY, on or about March l3, 2020, in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon, did unlawfully
`and intentionally and knowingly deliver METHAMPHETAMINE, contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided and against the peace»
`and dignity of the State of Oregon,
`The state further alleges that the above-described delivery involved substantial quantities of a controlled substance, consisting of 10 or
`more grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount ofMETHAWIETAWE, its salts, isomers or salts of its isomers;
`The state further alleges that the above-described delivery of METHAMPHETAWE involved 100 grams or more of a mixture or
`substance containing a detectable amount ofWTHAWFETAWE, its salts, isomers, or salts of its isomers.
`' This count is connected together by two or more acts or transactions with the other count(s) of this charging instrument. This count is of
`the same and similar character as the conduct alleged in the other count(s) of this charging instrument. This count constitutes part of a common
`scheme or plan based on two or more acts or transactions with the other count(s) of this charging instrument.
`COUNT 4
`FELONY FLEEING OR ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE A POLICE OFFICER
`The said Defendant(s), RICHARD JOHN CHENEY, on or about March 13,2020, in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon, being an
`operator of a motor vehicle upon a public highway and premises open to the public, and having been givenl a visible and audible signal to stop by a
`police ofiicer who was in uniforrn and prominently displaying thepolice officer's badge of office, did unlawfully and knowingly, while still 1n the
`vehicle, flee and attempt to elude a pursuing police officer, contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided and against the peace and
`dignity of the State of Oregon,
`This count is connected together by two or more acts or transactions with the other counts of this charging instrument. This count is_o,f,_,
`the same and similar character as the conduct alleged 1n the other counts of this charging instrument. This cou 226R35545
`scheme or plan based on two or more acts or transactions with the other counts of this charging instrument.
`COUNT 5
`RECKLESS DRIVING
`
`ndlclment
`15572919
`
`mI
`
`INDICTMENT
`
`Dist: Original: Court— Copies: Defendant, Def. Attorney, DA, Data Entry
`
`I
`
`VerifiedCorrectCopyofOriginal7/25/2022._
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`Defendant:
`
`Richard John Cheney , Court Nbr -—
`
`The said Defendant(s), RICHARD JOHN CHENEY, on or about March 13, 2020, in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon, did unlawfully
`and recklessly drive a vehicle upon a public highway and premises open to the public,'in a manner that endangered the safety of persons or
`property, contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State of Oregon,
`This count is connected together by two or more acts or transactions with the other counts of this charging instrument This count is of
`the same and similar character as the conduct alleged 1n the other counts of this charging instrument. This count constitutes part of a common
`scheme or plan based on two or more acts or transactions with the other counts of this charging instrument.
`COUNT 6
`RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING ANOTHER PERSON
`The said Defendant(s), RICHARD JOHN CHENEY, on or about March l3, 2020, in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon, did unlawfully
`and recklessly create a substantial risk of serious physical injury to another person, contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided and
`against the peace and dignity of the State of Oregop,
`This count is connected together by two or more acts or transactions with the'other counts of this charging instrument. This count is of
`the same and similar character as the conduct alleged in the other counts of this charging instrument. This count constitutes part of a common
`scheme or plan based on two or more acts or transactions with the other counts of this charging instrument.
`COUNT 7
`MISDEMEANOR FLEEING 0R ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE A POLICE OFFICER
`The said Defendant(s), RICHARD JOHN CHENEY, on or about March 13, 2020,
`in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon, being an
`operator of a motor vehicle upon a public highway and premises open to the public, and having been given a visible and audible signal to stop by a
`police officer who was in uniforrn and prominently displaying the police officer's badge of office, did get out of the vehicle and unlawfully and
`knowingly flee and attempt to elude the police officer, contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided and against the peace and dignity of
`the State of Oregon,
`This count is connected together by two or more acts or transactions with the other counts of this charging instrument. This count is of
`the same and similar character as the conduct alleged in the other counts of this charging instrument. This count constitutes part of a common
`scheme or plan based on two or more acts or transactions with the other counts of this charging instrument.
`Dated at Portland, Oregon, in the county aforesaid, on JULY 25, 2022.
`
`VerifiedCorrectCopyofOriginal7/25/2022._
`
`Witnesses
`Examined Before the Grand Jug
`in person (unless noted!
`Zach Bohince (By Simultaneous Television
`Transmission)
`
`Grand Jurv Proceedings on:
`July 22, 2022
`
`'1
`
`A TRUE BILL
`
`/S/Z1ne Steinbrecher
`l
`Foreperson of the Grand Jury
`MIKE SCHMIDT (084679)
`Dis Inct Attorney
`Mxtl
`
`,Oregon
`
`By
`
`Deputy
`
`Crime Classification
`
`(Def - CHENEY) B/F + B/F + B/F + C/F + A/M + A/M + '
`
`AFFmMATIVE DECLARATION
`The District Attorney hereby affirmatively declares for the record, as required by ORS 161.566, upon the date scheduled for the first appearance of the defendant, and before the
`court asks under ORS 135.020 how the defendant pleads to the charge(s), the State's intention that any misdemeanor charged herein proceed as a misdemeanor. CODY W.
`LINDERHOLM OSB 194042 //jbm
`
`Pursuant to 2005 Or Laws ch. 463 sections l to 7, 20(1) and 21 to 23, the State hereby provides written notice of the State's intention to rely at sentencing on
`enhancement facts for any statutory ground for the imposition of consecutive sentences codified under ORS 137.123 on these counts or to any other sentence
`which has been previously imposed or is simultaneously imposed upon this defendant.
`
`INDICTMENT
`
`Dist: Original: Court — Copies: Defendant, Def. Attorney, DA, Data Entry
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket