`
`Office
`
`of
`
`ROBERTJ.MILETSKY
`AnomEY
`Ar LAW
`
`53 LEGEND
`WHITE
`PLAINS,
`Tw 914-946-7000
`
`2
`SUITE
`CIRCLE,
`NEW YORK 10603
`FAx
`
`914-948-5000
`
`Affiliated:
`
`Miletsky
`Merrick
`
`& Miller,P.C.
`
`(Long
`
`Island),
`
`New York
`
`June
`
`25,
`
`2019
`
`By
`Hon
`
`Electronic
`
`Erin
`
`filing
`P. Gall
`
`Justice,
`Supreme
`
`Supreme
`
`Court,
`
`Court
`
`Oneida
`
`200
`
`Utica,
`
`Elizabeth
`Street
`New York
`
`County
`
`Re:
`
`EFCA
`Plaintiffs'
`
`2017-000904
`
`[Palumbo
`
`proposed
`
`Order
`
`v. Migliaccio]
`to Show
`Cause
`
`(Docket
`
`69)
`
`Dear
`
`Justice
`
`Gall:
`
`We represent
`Order
`
`proposed
`
`Defendants
`to Show
`
`Cause
`5how
`
`elects
`
`to
`
`sign
`
`the
`
`Order
`
`to
`
`in
`
`the
`
`above
`
`(Docket
`
`Cause,
`
`69)
`then
`
`matter.
`submlhl
`
`I
`
`respectfelly
`
`I
`
`respectfully
`June
`
`25,
`
`write
`
`concerning
`
`2019,
`
`for
`
`signature.
`
`request
`
`that
`
`the
`
`specific
`
`weekday
`
`Court
`
`dates
`
`Second
`
`deposition.
`
`Ordering
`The
`
`Paragraph
`therein,
`of my request
`
`basis
`
`apparently
`
`directing
`
`is
`
`the
`
`following:
`
`The
`
`core
`
`on
`
`the monon
`
`the
`
`deposition
`
`of Dr.
`
`Migliaccio
`
`issue
`
`is whether
`
`day,
`
`to minimize
`Plaintiffs'
`
`the
`
`disruption
`
`counsel
`
`does
`
`to Dr.
`not make
`
`my numerous
`seeks
`
`to
`
`but
`
`confirmations
`
`that
`
`Dr.
`
`Migliaccio
`
`is
`
`ready,
`
`willing
`
`sit
`
`for
`
`the
`
`deposition
`
`on
`
`a weekend
`
`day.
`
`Migliaccio's
`
`ongoing,
`
`active
`
`that
`
`clear
`
`in
`
`his moving
`
`papers,
`and
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`In Sct,
`ai
`a weekend.
`
`a weekend
`
`Unfortüüately,
`make
`
`clear
`
`deposed,
`give
`more
`
`any
`
`legitimate
`
`fully
`
`addressed
`
`basis
`
`in
`
`why
`opposition
`
`the
`
`deposition
`
`cannot
`
`go
`
`forward
`
`papers,
`
`as
`
`necessary.
`
`Insofar
`
`as
`
`the
`
`Second
`
`Ordering
`
`Paragraph
`
`the
`
`prophsed
`
`Order
`
`to Show
`
`concerned,
`
`deposition.
`
`regarding
`
`that
`
`paragraph
`
`The
`
`date
`
`of
`
`the
`
`certainly
`deposition
`
`appears
`
`is
`
`whether
`
`the
`
`deposition
`
`can
`
`be
`
`scheduled
`
`specific
`
`contested
`issue
`a weekend
`
`for
`
`weekday
`on the
`
`dates
`
`motion,
`
`date,
`
`instead
`
`within
`to mañdate
`the main
`
`
`
`Law
`
`Office
`
`ofROBERTJ.MILETSKY
`
`Hon
`
`Erin
`
`Justice,
`
`June
`
`Page
`
`25,
`2
`
`P. Gall
`Supreme
`
`2019
`
`Court
`
`McKinneys
`
`by Professor
`
`- PRACTICE
`M.
`
`Patrick
`
`COMMENTARIES
`
`Connors
`
`C2214:27
`
`Papers
`
`on Order
`
`Cause.
`
`to Show
`on
`submitted
`an
`a memorandum
`on
`
`The
`
`order,
`
`applicant
`
`contain,
`
`key
`
`papers
`
`affidavits
`
`and
`
`as
`
`in
`
`"to
`
`a way
`show-cause
`
`show
`
`order
`
`to
`
`bring
`
`a contested
`
`to
`
`show
`
`cause
`
`are
`
`the
`
`proposed
`
`of
`
`law.
`
`The
`
`order
`
`is
`
`sought
`
`motion,
`
`and
`
`it will
`
`therefore
`
`a notice
`
`to
`
`the
`
`other
`
`side
`
`that
`
`relief"
`
`terminology,
`why
`relief
`
`business
`
`has
`
`to
`
`thus-and-so
`
`should
`
`not
`
`be
`
`granted
`
`required
`
`against
`
`motion
`
`it.
`
`and
`
`cause
`
`The
`
`thus-and-so
`
`the
`
`court
`
`does
`
`not
`
`determine
`
`whether
`
`to
`
`sign
`
`an
`
`order
`
`to
`
`show
`
`cause.
`
`do with
`the
`when
`
`merits
`
`merits
`
`deciding
`
`those
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`The
`
`usual
`
`case
`
`finds
`
`the
`
`court,
`
`on the
`
`show-cause
`
`áoolication.
`
`looking
`
`into
`show
`
`the
`
`merits
`
`but
`
`into
`
`the
`
`factors
`
`that
`
`reflect
`
`on whether
`
`to
`
`allow
`
`The
`
`should
`
`cause
`
`procedure.
`
`i.e.,
`
`time,
`
`method,
`
`etc.
`
`applicant
`
`see
`
`to
`
`it
`
`that
`
`the
`
`affidavit
`
`contains
`
`facts
`
`discretion
`
`as
`
`to
`
`those
`
`memorandum
`
`of
`
`law.
`
`answer
`
`the
`
`question:
`
`[Emphasis
`
`added]
`
`items,
`The
`
`why
`
`preferably
`
`supporting
`an
`
`isn't
`
`justifying
`with
`
`support
`
`the
`
`court's
`from
`
`the
`
`exercise
`
`papers
`
`should
`
`contemplate
`
`ordinary
`
`notice
`
`of motion
`
`adequate
`
`I will
`
`refrain
`
`Show
`
`Cause,
`
`although
`
`from
`
`it
`
`the
`addressing
`seem that
`does
`
`merits
`Plaintiffs'
`
`of
`
`the
`
`motion
`
`being
`
`brought
`
`counsel
`
`is
`
`on by Order
`reargue
`
`to
`
`by
`
`the
`
`Court.
`
`It
`
`also
`
`does
`
`attempting
`seem
`not
`
`Cause,
`
`since
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`could
`
`have
`
`set
`
`clear
`
`why
`a return
`
`any
`event,
`to Show
`
`at
`
`this
`
`Cause,
`
`point,
`then
`
`DefeÈdants
`
`the
`
`Court
`
`respectfully
`out
`
`the
`
`it
`
`can
`
`cross
`
`before
`
`discovery
`be
`
`to
`
`brought
`
`days
`
`after
`
`motions
`already
`on by Order
`of
`the
`
`service
`
`decided
`to Show
`
`motion.
`
`In
`
`if
`
`the
`
`Court
`
`elects
`
`to
`
`sign
`
`the
`
`Order
`
`paragraph
`
`that
`
`essentially
`
`determines
`
`(as
`
`interim
`
`relief)
`
`the
`
`motion
`
`Thank
`
`you.
`
`Re
`
`ec
`
`lly
`
`r
`
`