throbber
FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 07/22/2021 02:57 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 66
`
`INDEX NO. 801838/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2021
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK
`SUPREME COURT : COUNTY OF ERIE
`__________________________________________
`SAMUEL, SON & CO. (USA) INC. d/b/a ROLL
`FORM GROUP,
`
`
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`SIMPSON & BROWN GROUP, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`__________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Index No.: 801838/2020
`
`AFFIRMATION OF ROBERT C. CARBONE
`
`
`
`
`ROBERT C. CARBONE, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the State of New
`
`York, pursuant to CPLR Rule 2106, affirms under penalty of perjury:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney associated with the law firm Duke Holzman Photiadis &
`
`Gresens, LLP, attorneys for Plaintiff, Samuel, Son & Co. (USA) Inc. d/b/a Roll Form Group
`
`(“Samuel”), in the within action and, as such, I am fully familiar with the facts and
`
`circumstances set forth herein and I am competent to testify as to these matters.
`
`2.
`
`I submit this Affirmation in Opposition to Defendant’s Order to Show Cause
`
`Seeking (I) Vacatur of Default Judgment and (II) Dismissal of Complaint.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant, Simpson & Brown Group, Inc., is a
`
`foreign business corporation organized and existing under the laws of New Jersey that is
`
`authorized to do business in New York State. A true and correct report of from the New York
`
`Department of State’s web site concerning Defendant’s entity status is attached herewith and
`
`made a part hereof as Exhibit A.
`
`
`
`1
`
`1 of 2
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 07/22/2021 02:57 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 66
`
`INDEX NO. 801838/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2021
`
`4.
`
`A true and correct excerpt from a LinkedIn web site associated with a person
`
`named Whitney Fox identified as an employee of Defendant is attached herewith and made a
`
`part hereof as Exhibit B. Exhibit B was accessed and captured on July 19, 2021.
`
`5.
`
`A true and correct copy of Executive Order 107 signed on March 21, 2020 by
`
`Governor Philip D. Murphy of the State of New Jersey is attached herewith and made a part
`
`hereof as Exhibit C. Paragraphs 2 and 26 of the Exhibit C implement the stay-at-home order in
`
`New Jersey effective as of 9:00pm on March 21, 2020 that led to business closures.
`
`6.
`
`WHEREFORE, Samuel respectfully requests that: (1) Defendant’s application for
`
`vacatur of the default judgment be DENIED in its entirety or, in the alternative, that the default
`
`judgment be upheld in part as to the principal amount due and owing to Plaintiff; (2) in the event
`
`the Court determines that a question of fact exists concerning the validity of service upon
`
`Defendant that an evidentiary hearing be scheduled by the Court; (3) the temporary restraining
`
`order granted pursuant to the Court’s Order to Show Cause dated July 15, 2021 [Doc. No. 57] be
`
`dissolved in its entirety; (4) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to CPLR § 3211(a)(8) be
`
`denied; and (5) the Court grant such further and other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`
`
`
`Dated: Buffalo, New York
`
`July 22, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Robert C. Carbone .
`Robert C. Carbone
`
`
`
`2
`
`2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket