throbber
FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2018 04:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12
`
`INDEX NO. 23611/2017E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2018
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`OF BRONX
`---------------------------------------------------------------------X
`the
`In the Matter
`of
`the Application
`of
`GOVERNMENT
`EMPLOYEES
`INSURANCE
`COMPANY,
`
`-against-
`
`SHARNETT
`
`WILLIAMS,
`
`—
`----------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`C O U N S E L O R S :
`
`Petitioner,
`
`Respondent.
`
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`23611/2017E
`
`ORDER WITH
`OF ENTRY
`
`NOTICE
`
`PLEASE
`
`TAKE
`
`NOTICE
`
`that
`
`the within
`
`is a true
`
`copy
`
`of an Order
`
`duly
`
`entered
`
`in the
`
`office
`
`of
`
`the
`
`clerk
`
`of
`
`the Supreme
`
`Court,
`
`Bronx
`
`County
`
`on March
`
`23,
`
`2018.
`
`Dated:
`
`Staten
`April
`
`Island,
`3, 2018
`
`New York
`
`Yours,
`
`etc.,
`
`CONNORS
`
`& CONNORS,
`
`P.C.
`
`By:
`
`J. MCKENNA
`ERIK
`for Petitioner
`Attorneys
`766 Castleton
`Avenue
`NY
`Staten
`
`10310
`
`Island,
`442-1700
`No.: DGE 26341
`File
`
`(718)
`Our
`
`TO:
`
`OF RYAN S. GOLDSTEIN,
`LAW OFFICE
`Attorneys
`for Respondent
`43 Westchester
`Square,
`NY 10461
`239-0239
`
`Suite
`
`2A
`
`Bronx,
`
`(718)
`
`PLLC
`
`AMERICAN
`120 Broadway,
`New York,
`
`ARBITRATION
`15"'
`Floor
`10271
`
`NY
`
`ASSOCIATION
`
`1 of 6
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2018 04:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12
`
`INDEX NO. 23611/2017E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2018
`
`[FILED
`NYSCEF
`
`BRONX
`:
`NO.
`DOC.
`
`9
`
`I
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03
`
`/23
`
`2018
`
`01:
`
`33
`
`PM
`
`INDEX
`
`NO.
`
`23611/2017E
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/23/2018
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`PART
`
`8
`
`COORT OF THE STATE
`OF BRONX
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`Index
`Motion
`Motion
`
`23611/2017E
`No.:
`No.:
`Calendar
`Date:
`Return
`
`7
`08/14/17
`
`.
`
`In the Matter
`GOVERNMENT
`COMPANY
`
`of
`
`the Application
`EMPLOYEES
`
`of
`the
`INSURANCE
`
`Petitioner,
`
`SHARNETT
`
`WILLIAMS,
`
`Respondent,
`
`ORDER
`
`DECISION/
`Present:
`Hon.
`Justice
`
`A. Miles
`Donald
`Court
`Supreme
`
`Recitation,
`notice
`this
`
`as required
`of petition
`
`by Rule
`2219(a)
`arbitration:
`to stay
`
`of
`
`the C.P,L.R.,
`
`of
`
`the papers
`
`considered
`
`in the review
`
`of
`
`Papers
`..........,,..................
`Annexed
`Exhibits
`of Petition
`Notice
`and
`.....................................................
`in Opposition
`Affirmation
`Affirmation...................................................................
`
`Reply
`
`Numbered
`1
`2
`3
`
`Petitioner
`
`moves
`
`for
`
`an order,
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR §7503(c),
`
`permanently
`
`staying
`
`the
`
`arbitration
`
`initiated
`
`by
`
`respondent,
`
`or
`
`in the alternative,
`
`a temporary
`
`stay
`
`of arbitration
`
`until
`
`such
`
`time
`
`as petitioner
`
`has had
`
`an opportunity
`
`to conduct
`
`discovery
`
`permitted
`
`pursuant
`
`to the
`
`insurance
`
`contract.
`
`For
`
`the
`
`reasons
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`below,
`
`the petition
`
`is granted
`
`to the following
`
`extent.'
`extent:
`
`The
`
`the petitioner's
`
`was
`
`injured
`
`on June
`
`respondent
`
`Sharnett
`
`Williams,
`
`insured,
`
`allegedly
`
`12, 2014,
`
`as a result
`
`of an accident
`
`which
`
`occurred
`
`on the Sprain
`
`Brook
`
`Parkway
`
`North,
`
`near
`
`Jackson
`
`Avenue,
`
`Town
`
`of Greenburg
`
`in Westchester
`
`County,
`
`New York.
`
`In reporting
`
`the
`
`accident
`
`to petitioner,
`
`the respondent
`
`stated
`
`that
`
`she swerved
`
`to avoid
`
`another
`
`vehicle
`
`and struck
`
`the guardrail.
`
`The
`
`respondent
`
`demanded
`
`arbitration
`
`against
`
`petitioner
`
`Government
`
`Employees
`
`Insurance
`
`Company
`
`(hereinafter
`
`referred
`
`to as "GEICO")
`
`for
`
`benefits
`
`under
`
`the uninsured
`
`motorists
`
`coverage
`
`afforded
`
`by the GEICO
`
`policy.
`
`GEICO
`
`now seeks
`
`a permanent
`
`stay
`
`of
`
`arbitration,
`
`asserting
`
`that
`
`the respondent
`
`did
`
`not make
`
`contact
`
`with
`
`the offending
`
`vehicle,
`
`a
`
`condition
`
`precedent
`
`to arbitration.
`
`Petitioner
`
`further
`
`contends
`
`that
`
`respondent
`
`did
`
`not provide
`
`any
`
`details
`
`regarding
`
`the accident
`
`or
`
`the respondent's
`
`alleged
`
`injuries,
`
`and as such
`
`has not
`
`complied
`
`Page
`
`1 of
`
`3
`
`2 of 6
`2 of
`4
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2018 04:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12
`
`INDEX NO. 23611/2017E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2018
`
`FILED
`NYSCEF
`
`BRONX
`:
`DOC.
`NO.
`
`9
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`0 3 /23
`
`/2
`
`018
`
`01:
`
`33
`
`PM
`
`INDEX
`
`NO.
`
`23 611/2017E
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/23/2018
`
`with
`
`the requirements
`
`for
`
`a valid
`
`demand
`
`for
`
`arbitration.
`
`Alternatively,
`
`GEICO
`
`seeks
`
`a temporary
`
`stay,
`
`pending
`
`completion
`
`of discovery.
`
`It
`
`is well
`
`settled
`
`that
`
`in a proceeding
`
`in which
`
`an insurer
`
`is seeking
`
`a stay
`
`of uninsured
`
`motorist
`
`arbitration,
`
`the
`
`petitioning
`
`insurer
`
`"bears
`
`the initial
`
`burden
`
`of proving
`
`that
`
`the offending
`
`vehicle
`
`was
`
`in fact
`
`insured
`
`at
`
`Tichman,
`
`185 A.D.2d
`
`884,
`
`885
`
`the time
`of
`(2nd Dept.
`
`accident."
`
`the
`
`Matter
`
`of Eagle
`
`Insurance
`
`Company
`
`v.
`
`1992).
`
`In other words
`
`the petitioning
`
`insurer
`
`must
`
`establish
`
`a prima
`
`facie
`
`case of coverage
`
`for
`
`the adverse
`
`or offending
`
`vehicle.
`
`In support
`
`of
`
`its application,
`
`the petitioner
`
`submits
`
`a copy
`
`of
`
`the respondent's
`
`request
`
`for
`
`uninsured
`
`motorist
`
`arbitration,
`
`dated
`
`April
`
`10, 2017
`
`and which
`
`appears
`
`to be prepared
`
`and
`
`is
`
`signed
`
`by respondent's
`
`counsel.
`
`Petitioner
`
`maintains
`
`that
`
`the respondent
`
`in reporting
`
`the accident
`
`to petitioner,
`
`stated
`
`that
`
`she swerved
`
`to avoid
`
`another
`
`vehicle
`
`and
`
`struck
`
`the
`
`guardrail
`
`and that
`
`she did
`
`not make
`
`contact
`
`with
`
`the
`
`allegedly
`
`uninsured
`
`vehicle.
`
`The
`
`respondent
`
`has opposed
`
`the
`
`application
`
`for
`
`a permanent
`
`stay
`
`of arbitration
`
`and submits
`
`a copy
`
`of
`
`the police
`
`accident
`
`report,
`
`that
`
`should
`
`be stayed
`
`for
`
`of discovery.
`
`contending
`
`the matter
`
`temporarily
`
`to allow
`
`completion
`
`In its reply
`
`papers,
`
`Petitioner
`
`points
`
`to the respondent
`
`counsel's
`
`affirmation
`
`in opposition
`
`in maintaining
`
`that Respondent
`
`has admitted
`
`that
`
`her
`
`vehicle
`
`had no contact
`
`whatsoever
`
`with
`
`the
`
`alleged
`
`uninsured
`
`vehicle.
`
`Petitioner
`
`also
`
`argues
`
`that
`
`respondent
`
`has not
`
`refuted
`
`or even
`
`addressed
`
`her
`
`failure
`
`to provide
`
`information
`
`as to any
`
`alleged
`
`injuries
`
`or
`
`the precise
`
`circumstances
`
`surrounding
`
`the underlying
`
`accident.
`
`Physical
`
`contact
`
`between
`
`the insured
`
`vehicle
`
`and an unidentified,
`
`uninsured
`
`or under
`
`insured
`
`vehicle
`
`is a condition
`
`precedent
`
`to arbitration
`
`under
`
`an insurance
`
`policy's
`
`uninsured
`
`motorist
`
`endorsement
`
`( See,
`
`Insurance
`
`Law
`
`§ 5217).
`
`The
`
`burden
`
`is on the respondent
`
`to show,
`
`at
`
`least prima
`
`physical
`
`facie,
`
`that
`
`actual
`
`contact
`
`occurred.
`
`The
`
`insured
`
`has
`
`the burden
`
`of
`
`establishing
`
`that
`
`the loss
`
`sustained
`
`was
`
`caused
`
`by an uninsured
`
`vehicle,
`
`namely
`
`that
`
`physical
`
`contact
`
`occurred,
`
`that
`
`the identity
`
`of
`
`the owner
`
`and operator
`
`of
`
`the offending
`
`vehicle
`
`could
`
`not
`
`be
`
`ascertained,
`
`and that
`
`the
`
`insured's
`
`efforts
`
`to ascertain
`
`such
`
`identity
`
`were
`
`reasonable.
`
`(Nova
`
`Cas.
`
`Co.
`
`v. Musco,
`
`48 A.D.
`
`3d 572
`
`[2nd
`
`Dept.
`
`2008]).
`
`Petitioner
`
`has
`
`failed
`
`to establish
`
`by admissible
`
`evidence
`
`a prima
`
`facie
`
`case
`
`for
`
`a
`
`permanent
`
`stay
`
`of arbitration.
`
`While
`
`Petitioner
`
`points
`
`out
`
`the deficiencies
`
`of
`
`respondent's
`
`Page
`
`2 of
`
`3
`
`3 of 6
`of
`3
`4
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2018 04:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12
`
`INDEX NO. 23611/2017E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2018
`
`BRONX
`LED :
`FI
`NO.
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`
`9
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03
`
`/ 23
`
`2018
`
`01:
`
`33
`
`PM)
`
`INDEX
`
`NO.
`
`23611/2017E
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/23/2018
`
`demand
`
`for
`
`arbitration,
`
`particularly,
`
`the lack
`
`of any
`
`sworn
`
`affidavit
`
`or statement
`
`by respondent
`
`herself,
`
`surrounding
`
`the
`
`circumstances
`
`of
`
`the accident,
`
`petitioner
`
`somehow
`
`maintains
`
`that
`
`respondent
`
`admits
`
`that
`
`there was
`
`absolutely
`
`no physical
`
`contact
`
`with
`
`the alleged
`
`offending
`
`vehicle.
`
`a framed
`
`should
`
`be conducted
`
`on this
`
`issue.
`
`At
`
`the very
`
`least,
`
`issue
`
`hearing
`
`Accordingly,
`
`it
`
`is hereby
`
`ORDERED
`
`that
`
`petitioner's
`
`application
`
`to the extent
`
`it seeks
`
`to permanently
`
`stay
`
`respondent's
`
`uninsured
`
`motorist
`
`proceeding,
`
`is denied;
`
`and it
`
`is further
`
`ORDERED
`
`that
`
`the subject
`
`arbitration
`
`is temporarily
`
`stayed
`
`for ninety
`
`(90)
`
`days,
`
`pending
`
`a framed
`
`issue
`
`hearing
`
`as to whether
`
`there was
`
`any physical
`
`contact
`
`between
`
`respondent's
`
`vehicle
`
`and the offending
`
`vehicle;
`
`and
`
`it
`
`is further
`
`that
`
`the parties
`
`are directed
`
`to appear
`
`for
`
`a framed
`
`issue
`
`ORDERED,
`
`hearing
`
`on Monday,
`
`May
`
`14, 2018
`
`at 11:00
`
`a.m.
`
`in Room 706, Part
`
`8 of
`
`the New York
`
`State
`
`Supreme
`
`Court,
`
`Bronx
`
`County
`
`vehicle
`
`in order
`
`to resolve
`
`the
`
`issue whether
`
`there was
`
`any physical
`
`contact
`
`between
`
`respondent's
`
`and the offending
`
`vehicle;
`
`and
`
`it
`
`is further
`
`ORDERED
`
`that
`
`petitioner
`
`shall
`
`provide
`
`respondent
`
`Sharnett
`
`Williams
`
`with
`
`HIPAA
`
`compliant
`
`authorizations,
`
`within
`
`twenty
`
`(20)
`
`days
`
`of entry
`
`of
`
`this
`
`order,
`
`which
`
`respondent
`
`shall
`
`sign
`
`to physical
`
`and return
`
`to petitioner,
`
`and
`
`submit
`
`examination
`
`and
`
`an examination
`
`under
`
`oath
`
`within
`
`sixty
`
`(60)
`
`days
`
`thereafter;
`
`and
`
`it
`
`is further
`
`ORDERED
`
`that
`
`petitioner
`
`shall
`
`serve
`
`a copy
`
`of
`
`this
`
`order
`
`with
`
`notice
`
`of entry
`
`upon
`
`respondent
`
`within
`
`twenty
`
`(20)
`
`days
`
`of entry
`
`of
`
`the order.
`
`This
`
`constitutes
`
`the decision
`
`and order
`
`of
`
`the Court.
`
`NAR
`
`15
`
`2018
`
`DATE
`
`HON. DONA
`
`D A. MILES,
`
`JSC,
`
`Page
`
`3 of
`
`3
`
`4 of 6
`4
`4 of
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2018 04:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12
`
`INDEX NO. 23611/2017E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2018
`
`AFFIDAVIT
`
`OF SERVICE
`
`SS.:
`
`):
`
`)
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY
`
`OF RICHMOND
`
`says:
`Laura Meyer,
`sworn,
`duly
`being
`On April
`New York.
`and reside
`at Staten
`Island,
`OF ENTRY
`in Supreme
`by electronic
`Court
`filing
`in a post-paid
`in an official
`enclosed
`wrapper,
`U.S. Postal
`Service
`within
`New York
`set
`forth
`after
`each name:
`address
`
`State,
`
`of age
`18 years
`am over
`to the action,
`I am not a party
`NOTICE
`ORDER WITH
`I served
`the within
`3, 2018,
`a true
`thereof
`Bronx
`and by depositing
`copy
`of
`the
`the exclusive
`care and custody
`the last known
`the following
`persons
`at
`
`County
`under
`to each of
`
`depository
`addressed
`
`PLLC
`
`LA
`
`MEYER
`
`TO:
`
`Bronx,
`
`OF RYAN S. GOLDSTEIN,
`LAW OFFICE
`Attorneys
`for Respondent
`43 Westchester
`Square,
`NY 10461
`
`Suite
`
`2A
`
`AMERICAN
`120 Broadway,
`New York,
`
`ARBITRATION
`15th
`FlOOr
`10271
`
`NY
`
`ASSOCIATION
`
`Sworn
`d
`
`to before me this
`2018.
`day of April,
`
`Not
`
`ublic
`
`Notary
`
`PESCE
`ANGELA
`of NewYork
`State
`Public,
`No.01PE6234726
`in Richmond
`Qualified
`
`County
`
`5 of 6
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2018 04:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12
`
`INDEX NO. 23611/2017E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2018
`
`Index No.
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`RJI No.
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF BRONX
`
`Hon.
`OF NEW YORK
`
`the Application
`EMPLOYEES
`
`the
`of
`INSURANCE
`
`of
`
`In the Matter
`GOVERNMENT
`COMPANY,
`
`-against-
`
`SHARNETT
`
`WILLIAMS,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`Respondent.
`
`ORDER WITH
`
`NOTICE
`
`OF ENTRY
`
`P.C.
`
`& CONNORS,
`CONNORS
`for Petitioner
`Attorneys
`and Post Office Address,
`766 Castleton
`Avenue
`Staten Island, New York
`10310
`PHONE
`(718) 442-1700
`(718) 442-1717
`FAX
`
`Telephone
`
`Office
`
`Signature
`
`(Rule
`
`130-1.1-a)
`
`Service
`
`of a copy of
`
`the within
`
`Dutud,
`
`Attorney(s)
`==================================================================================
`Please take notice
`
`C
`
`ERIK
`
`J. MCKENNA
`
`is hereby
`
`admitted,
`
`..______________________________________
`for
`
`NOTICE OF ENTRY
`the within
`is a (certified)
`that
`true copy of a
`the clerk of
`the within
`duly entered
`of
`in the office
`O
`NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
`that an order
`settlement
`to the HON.
`of
`the within
`named court,
`on
`Dated,
`
`at
`
`of which
`
`at
`
`To
`
`named court on
`
`the within
`
`be presented
`is a true copy will
`one of
`the judges
`
`for
`
`M
`
`etc.
`Yours,
`& CONNORS,
`CONNORS
`Attorneys
`for
`Office
`and Post Office Address
`766 CASTLETON
`AVENUE
`NY 10310
`STATEN
`ISLAND,
`
`P.C.
`
`6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket