`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`
`ACUITAS THERAPEUTICS INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Case No. 1:22-cv-02229-MKV
`
`vs.
`
`GENEVANT SCIENCES GMBH, and
`ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORP.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF DEFENDANT ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORP.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
`THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
`PROCEDURE 12(b)(1)
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the Notice of Motion of Defendant Genevant Sciences
`
`GmbH to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`12(b)(1), dated October 4, 2022; the Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Motion to
`
`Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), dated October 4, 2022; the
`
`Declaration of Matthew D. Robson, dated October 4, 2022, and exhibits thereto; and upon all the
`
`papers and proceedings had herein, Defendant Arbutus Biopharma Corp. (“Arbutus”) will move
`
`this Court, before the Honorable Mary Kay Vyskocil, United States District Judge, at the Daniel
`
`Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007, on a
`
`date and at a time designated by the Court, for an Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`12(b)(1) dismissing the First Amended Complaint in its entirety with prejudice and granting such
`
`other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 46 Filed 10/04/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`Dated: October 4, 2022
`
` Los Angeles, California
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Kira A. Davis
`Daralyn J. Durie (pro hac vice)
`Eric C. Wiener (pro hac vice)
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`217 Leidesdorff Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`T: 415-362-6666
`
`Kira A. Davis
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`953 East 3rd Street
`Los Angeles, CA 90013
`T: 213-992-4499
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Arbutus
`Biopharma Corp.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
