throbber
Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 41 Filed 09/02/22 Page 1 of 2
`
`quinn emanuel trial lawyers | new york
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10010-1601 | TEL (212) 849-7000 FAX (212) 849-7100
`
`WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NO.
`(212) 849-7412
`
`WRITER'S EMAIL ADDRESS
`raynimrod@quinnemanuel.com
`
`9/2/2022
`
`September 2, 2022
`
`VIA ECF
`
`Hon. Mary Kay Vyskocil
`United States District Court
`Southern District of New York
`500 Pearl Street, Room 2230
`New York, NY 10007
`
`Re:
`
`Acuitas Therapeutics Inc. v. Genevant Sciences GmbH and Arbutus Biopharma Corp.,
`Case No. 1:22-cv-02229-MKV
`
`Your Honor:
`
`I represent Defendant Genevant Sciences GmbH and am submitting this letter motion on behalf of
`all the parties in the above-captioned matter to jointly request a modest adjustment to the August
`16, 2022, scheduling order (ECF No. 37), which governs the filing deadlines applicable to
`Plaintiff’s forthcoming amended complaint and Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
`
`Under the existing order, Plaintiff’s amended complaint is due on or before September 6, 2022,
`Defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint is due within 14 days thereafter, and
`opposition and reply briefs are due on the schedule set forth in Local Rule 6.1(b). The parties have
`conferred regarding those dates, including in light of counsel’s preexisting professional
`commitments, and hereby jointly and respectfully request that those filing dates be adjusted as
`follows: Plaintiff’s amended complaint shall be filed on September 6, 2022; Defendants’ motion
`to dismiss shall be filed on October 4, 2022; Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion shall be
`filed on November 1, 2022; and Defendants’ reply in support of their motion shall be filed on
`November 16, 2022. There have been no previous requests for adjournments or extensions of
`these deadlines.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
` /s/ Raymond N. Nimrod
`Raymond N. Nimrod
`Counsel for Defendant Genevant Sciences GmbH
`
`quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp
`ATLANTA | AUSTIN | BOSTON | BRUSSELS | CHICAGO | DOHA | HAMBURG | HONG KONG | HOUSTON | LONDON | LOS ANGELES | MANNHEIM |
`MIAMI | MUNICH | NEUILLY-LA DEFENSE | NEW YORK | PARIS | PERTH | RIYADH | SALT LAKE CITY | SAN FRANCISCO | SEATTLE | SHANGHAI |
`SILICON VALLEY | STUTTGART | SYDNEY | TOKYO | WASHINGTON, DC | ZURICH
`
`USDC SDNY
`DOCUMENT
`ELECTRONICALLY FILED
`DOC #:
`
`
`
`DATE FILED:
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 41 Filed 09/02/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`cc:
`
`Daralyn J. Durie
`Eric C. Wiener
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`217 Leidesdorff Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 362-6666
`
`Kira A. Davis
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`953 E. 3rd Street
`Los Angeles, CA 90013
`(213) 992-4499
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Arbutus
`Biopharma Corp.
`
`Nicholas Groombridge
`Eric Alan Stone
`Josephine Young
`Allison C. Penfield
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
`GARRISON LLP
`1285 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10019
`(212) 373-2000
`
`Saurabh Gupta
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
`GARRISON LLP
`2001 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`(202) 223-7300
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Acuitas
`Therapeutics Inc.
`
`9/2/2022
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket