`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 419-3 Filed 09/20/23 Page 1of3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 419-3 Filed 09/20/23 Page 2 of 3
`Case: 22-1223 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 04/06/2023
`
`NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA, LLC,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`FITBIT LLC, GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`GARMIN LTD., GARMIN USA, INC.,
`Cross-Appellants
`______________________
`
`2022-1223, 2022-1224, 2022-1279
`______________________
`
`Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-
`00783, IPR2020-00910.
`______________________
`
`JUDGMENT
`______________________
`
`ELEY THOMPSON, Foley & Lardner LLP, Chicago, IL,
`argued for appellant. Also represented by RICHARD
`SPENCER MONTEI; GEORGE CHRISTOPHER BECK, Washing-
`ton, DC, MATTHEW WAYNE PETERS, Milwaukee, WI, RUBEN
`JOSE RODRIGUES, Boston, MA.
`
` DANIEL ZEILBERGER, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington,
`DC, argued for all cross-appellants. Cross-appellant Fitbit
`LLC also represented by NAVEEN MODI, STEPHEN BLAKE
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 419-3 Filed 09/20/23 Page 3 of 3
`Case: 22-1223 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 04/06/2023
`
`
`
`KINNAIRD, ALEXA LOWMAN, JOSEPH PALYS.
`
` ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park,
`KS, for cross-appellants Garmin International, Inc., Gar-
`min Ltd., Garmin USA, Inc. Also represented by JENNIFER
`C. BAILEY.
` ______________________
`
`THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
`
` PER CURIAM (DYK, SCHALL, and CHEN, Circuit
`Judges).
`
`AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
`
`
` ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
`
`
`
`April 6, 2023
`Date
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`