Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 399 Filed 08/29/22 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`FITBIT LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11586-FDS
`
`
`
`FITBIT LLC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR REDACTION OF
`ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT OF JUNE 24, 2022 HEARING
`
`Pursuant to Local Rules 7.1 and 7.2, Defendant Fitbit LLC (“Defendant” or “Fitbit”), by
`
`and through its undersigned counsel, respectfully moves for redaction of the electronic transcript
`
`of the summary judgment motion hearing held on June 24, 2022 (see D.I. #396).
`
`In particular, Fitbit requests that the following portions of the transcript be redacted and
`
`sealed because they reference Fitbit’s confidential business information that has been designated
`
`as Highly Confidential under the Order Adopting Discovery Stipulation and Modified Protective
`
`Order in this case (“Protective Order”) (D.I. #59).
`
`Portions Subject to Request for Redaction
`(by Page and Line Number)
`Page 10, ln. 15 (portion thereof)
`Page 15, lns. 4-7 (portions thereof)
`Page 15, lns. 23-25 (portions thereof)
`Page 16, ln. 1 (portion thereof)
`Page 16, ln. 3 (portion thereof)
`Page 18, lns. 7-10 (portions thereof)
`Page 18, lns. 14-15 (in their entirety)
`Page 18, lns. 17-18 (portions thereof)
`Page 18, ln. 19 (portion thereof)
`Page 18, lns. 22-24 (portions thereof)
`Page 21, lns. 18-20 (portions thereof)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`FITBIT LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11586-FDS
`
`
`
`FITBIT LLC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR REDACTION OF
`ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT OF JUNE 24, 2022 HEARING
`
`Pursuant to Local Rules 7.1 and 7.2, Defendant Fitbit LLC (“Defendant” or “Fitbit”), by
`
`and through its undersigned counsel, respectfully moves for redaction of the electronic transcript
`
`of the summary judgment motion hearing held on June 24, 2022 (see D.I. #396).
`
`In particular, Fitbit requests that the following portions of the transcript be redacted and
`
`sealed because they reference Fitbit’s confidential business information that has been designated
`
`as Highly Confidential under the Order Adopting Discovery Stipulation and Modified Protective
`
`Order in this case (“Protective Order”) (D.I. #59).
`
`Portions Subject to Request for Redaction
`(by Page and Line Number)
`Page 10, ln. 15 (portion thereof)
`Page 15, lns. 4-7 (portions thereof)
`Page 15, lns. 23-25 (portions thereof)
`Page 16, ln. 1 (portion thereof)
`Page 16, ln. 3 (portion thereof)
`Page 18, lns. 7-10 (portions thereof)
`Page 18, lns. 14-15 (in their entirety)
`Page 18, lns. 17-18 (portions thereof)
`Page 18, ln. 19 (portion thereof)
`Page 18, lns. 22-24 (portions thereof)
`Page 21, lns. 18-20 (portions thereof)
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 399 Filed 08/29/22 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`Page 23, ln. 11 (portions thereof)
`Page 23, lns. 13-14 (portions thereof)
`Page 23, lns. 16-19 (portions thereof)
`Page 23, lns. 21-22 (portions thereof)
`Page 24, ln. 4 (portions thereof)
`Page 24, lns. 8-16 (portions thereof)
`Page 24, ln. 25 (portion thereof)
`Page 25, ln. 3 (portions thereof)
`Page 31, lns. 22-24 (portion thereof)
`Page 32, ln. 4 (portion thereof)
`Page 32, lns. 10-12 (portions thereof)
`Page 32, lns. 20-24 (in their entirety)
`Page 33, ln. 5 (portion thereof)
`Page 33, lns. 9-10 (portions thereof)
`Page 33, ln. 13 (portion thereof)
`Page 33, lns. 20-25 (portions thereof)
`Page 34, ln. 1 (portion thereof)
`Page 34, lns. 3-24 (portions thereof)
`Page 35, lns. 1-14 (portions thereof)
`Page 35, lns. 16-25 (portions thereof)
`Page 36, lns. 1-25 (portions thereof)
`Page 37, lns. 1-22 (portions thereof)
`Page 39, ln. 14 (portion thereof)
`Page 40, lns. 4-5 (portions thereof)
`Page 40, lns. 11-13 (portions thereof)
`Page 40, lns. 16-17 (portions thereof)
`Page 40, lns. 21-22 (portions thereof)
`Page 41, lns. 4-5 (portions thereof)
`Page 41, lns. 7-8 (portions thereof)
`Page 41, lns. 19-24 (portions thereof)
`Page 42, lns. 4-5 (portions thereof)
`Page 46, lns. 12-14 (portions thereof)
`Page 48, lns. 1-2 (portions thereof)
`Page 51, lns. 2-13 (portions thereof)
`Page 51, lns. 15-16 (portions thereof)
`Page 51, lns. 24-25 (portions thereof)
`Page 52, lns. 1-2 (portions thereof)
`Page 54, ln. 5 (portion thereof)
`Page 54, ln. 18 (portion thereof)
`Page 55, ln. 23 (portion thereof)
`
`
`
`As grounds for this Motion, Fitbit states that the above-referenced portions of the transcript
`
`contain confidential information regarding the structure, function, and operation of the accused
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 399 Filed 08/29/22 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`Fitbit wearable devices, applications, and servers, and that has been designated Confidential under
`
`the Protective Order. Additionally, the above-referenced portions of the transcript include
`
`confidential information regarding the number of Fitbit users in the United States, as well as
`
`confidential information regarding internal Fitbit customer/market surveys, both of which are
`
`confidential Fitbit competitive and market intelligence, and accordingly, have been designated
`
`Confidential pursuant to the Protective Order.
`
`WHEREFORE, Fitbit respectfully requests that the foregoing portions of the electronic
`
`transcript of the June 24, 2022 summary judgment motion hearing be redacted and sealed. The
`
`above-referenced portions of the transcript should not be made available for inspection by the
`
`public.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: August 29, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
` By:
`
`
`
`/s/ Alexandra K. Kim
`David J. Shaw (pro hac vice)
`dshaw@desmaraisllp.com
`DESMARAIS LLP
`1701 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 200
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`Telephone: (202) 451-4900
`Facsimile: (202) 451-4901
`
`Leslie M. Spencer (pro hac vice)
`lspencer@desmaraisllp.com
`Karim Z. Oussayef (pro hac vice)
`koussayef@desmaraisllp.com
`Brian D. Matty (pro hac vice)
`bmatty@desmaraisllp.com
`DESMARAIS LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Telephone: (212) 351-3400
`Facsimile: (212) 351-3401
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 399 Filed 08/29/22 Page 4 of 6
`
`Ameet A. Modi (pro hac vice)
`amodi@desmaraisllp.com
`DESMARAIS LLP
`101 California Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 573-1900
`Facsimile: (415) 573-1901
`
`Gregory F. Corbett (BBO #646394)
`gcorbett@wolfgreenfield.com
`Alexandra K. Kim (BBO #707361)
`akim@wolfgreenfield.com
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02110
`Telephone: (617) 646-8000
`Facsimile: (617) 646-8646
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Fitbit LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 399 Filed 08/29/22 Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.2
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel for Fitbit conferred with counsel for Philips
`Philips’s counsel indicated that Philips does not oppose the relief requested by this Motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Alexandra K. Kim
`Alexandra K. Kim
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 399 Filed 08/29/22 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that this document is being filed through the Court’s electronic filing system,
`
`which serves counsel for other parties who are registered participants as identified on the Notice
`of Electronic Filing (NEF). Any counsel for other parties who are not registered participants are
`being served by first class mail on the date of the electronic filing.
`
`
`
`/s/ Alexandra K. Kim
`Alexandra K. Kim
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
