`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11586-FDS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`FITBIT LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION TO IMPOUND/SEAL DESIGNATED MATERIAL
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2 and the Order Adopting Discovery Stipulation and Modified
`
`Protective Order in this case (“Protective Order”), ECF No. 59, Defendant Fitbit LLC (“Fitbit”),
`
`respectfully requests the Court to impound (seal) Defendant Fitbit LLC’s Summary Judgment
`
`Hearing Presentation Concerning U.S. Patent No. 8,277,377 (“Defendant’s Presentation”).
`
`Plaintiff Philips North America LLC (“Philips”) does not oppose this Motion to Impound/Seal.
`
`The Protective Order allows parties to designate discovery material that contains or
`
`constitutes confidential business information as “CONFIDENTIAL.” As grounds for this Motion,
`
`Fitbit states that Defendant’s Presentation contains information regarding the operation of the
`
`accused Fitbit wearable devices, applications, and servers, and that has been designated
`
`Confidential under the Protective Order. Specifically, slides 12-15, 23, 36, 45, and 48-49 contain
`
`this Fitbit confidential information.
`
`Additionally, the redacted portions include block quotes of excerpts from the confidential
`
`Expert Report of Joseph A. Paradiso, Ph.D. Concerning Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 393 Filed 07/12/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`8,277,377. Specifically, slides 37 and 47 contain descriptions and analyses of Fitbit products,
`
`applications, and servers that have been designated as Confidential under the Protective Order.
`
`Additionally, Defendant’s Presentation includes block quotes of excerpts from the
`
`confidential Amended Expert Report of Tom Martin Concerning Infringement. Specifically, slide
`
`46 contains discussions regarding the same Fitbit confidential information and accordingly, has
`
`been designated Confidential.
`
`Additionally, Fitbit has filed a redacted version of Defendant’s Presentation with
`
`redactions of twelve slides (out of eighty-one total) that discuss Fitbit confidential business
`
`information.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Fitbit respectfully requests that the Court permit Fitbit to file
`
`under seal an unredacted version of Defendant’s Presentation. Fitbit further requests that the
`
`documents remain impounded until further Order by the Court, and that upon expiration of the
`
`impoundment, the documents be returned to Fitbit’s counsel.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 393 Filed 07/12/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 12, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`/s/ Alexandra K. Kim
`David J. Shaw (pro hac vice)
`dshaw@desmaraisllp.com
`DESMARAIS LLP
`1701 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 200
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`Telephone: (202) 451-4900
`Facsimile: (202) 451-4901
`
`Leslie M. Spencer (pro hac vice)
`lspencer@desmaraisllp.com
`Karim Z. Oussayef (pro hac vice)
`koussayef@desmaraisllp.com
`Brian D. Matty (pro hac vice)
`bmatty@desmaraisllp.com
`Henry Ard (pro hac vice)
`hard@desmaraisllp.com
`DESMARAIS LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Telephone: (212) 351-3400
`Facsimile: (212) 351-3401
`
`Ameet A. Modi (pro hac vice)
`amodi@desmaraisllp.com
`DESMARAIS LLP
`101 California Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 573-1900
`Facsimile: (415) 573-1901
`
`Gregory F. Corbett (BBO #646394)
`gcorbett@wolfgreenfield.com
`Alexandra K. Kim (BBO #707361)
`akim@wolfgreenfield.com
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02110
`Telephone: (617) 646-8000
`Facsimile: (617) 646-8646
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Fitbit LLC
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 393 Filed 07/12/22 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.2
`
`
`
`/s/ Henry Ard
`Henry Ard
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel for Fitbit conferred with counsel for Philips
`in a good-faith attempt to resolve or narrow the issue raised by this motion. Philips’s counsel
`indicated that Philips does not oppose the relief requested by this Motion
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 393 Filed 07/12/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that this document is being filed through the Court’s electronic filing system,
`
`which serves counsel for other parties who are registered participants as identified on the Notice
`of Electronic Filing (NEF). Any counsel for other parties who are not registered participants are
`being served by first class mail on the date of the electronic filing.
`
`
`
`/s/ Alexandra K. Kim
`Alexandra K. Kim
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`