Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 1 of 82
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`FITBIT LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11586-FDS
`
`REDACTED
`
`
`
`
`
`FITBIT LLC’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING PRESENTATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 2 of 82
`
`She% fitbit
`
`Fitbit’s Summary Judgment Hearing Presentation
`Concerning U.S. Patent No. 8,277,377
`
`June 24, 2022
`
`Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11586-FDS
`
`Philips North America LLC v. Fitbit LLC
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 3 of 82
`
`Dkt. 335 Philip’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment
`
`#fitbit
`
`2
`
`

`

`Evidencing The Products Ability To Infringe !s Insufficient Te Overcome Summary
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 4 of 82
`
`Judgment When No Direct Evidence Of Actual Infringment Has Been Provided
`
`“[W]e have held that it is not enough to simply show that a productis capable
`of infringement; the patent owner must show evidenceof specific instances
`of direct infringement.”
`
`Fujitsu Ltd. V. Netgear Inc., 620 F.3d 1321, 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
`
`“In order to prove direct infringement, a patentee must either point to
`specific instances of direct infringement or show that the accused device
`necessarily infringes the patent in suit.”
`ACCO Brands, Inc. v. ABA Locks Mfr. Co., 501 F.3d 1307, 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2007).
`
`# FitOIL
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 5 of 82
`
`The Accused Fitbit Products and System Are Not Capable
`
`of Infringement
`
`#fitbit
`
`4
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Net Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 6 of 82
`
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.g and 1.h
`(also presented in Dkt. 329: Fitbit’s MSJ of Non-Infringement)
`server”
`in elements 1.g and 1.h
`
`Fitbit Argument 1
`
`* Fitoil
`
`5
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Net Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 7 of 82
`
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.g and 1.h
`
`the
`
`1. A method for interactive exercise monitoring,
`method comprising the steps of:
`downloading an application to a web-enabled wireless
`a.
`phonedirectly from a remote server over the internet;
`coupling the a web-enabled wireless phone to a device
`which provides exercise-related information;
`>. rendering a user interface on the web-enabled wireless
`phone;
`. using the application, receiving data indicating a physi-
`ologic status ofa subject;
`. using the application, receiving data indicating an
`amount ofexercise performed by the subject;
`. whereinat least one ofthe data indicating a physiologic
`status of a subject or the data indicating an amount of
`exercise performed by the subject is received from the
`device which providesexercise-related information, and
`wherein the data indicating a physiologic status ofa
`subject is receivedat least partially while the subjectis
`
`exercising;
`
`b.
`
`2.
`
`* fitbit
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Net Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 8 of 82
`
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.g and 1.h
`
`(CurrentlyAmended) A method for interactive exercise monitoring, the method
`I.
`comprising the stepsof:
`
`a.
`
`coupling a web-enabled wireless phone to a device which provides heathexercise-related
`
`information;
`
`b
`
`c.
`
`rendering a userinterface on the web-enabled wireless phone;
`
`receiving Keatthexercise-related information in the web-enabled wireless phone, wherein
`
`the healthexercise-related information includes physiological data and data indicating an amount
`ofexercise performed deta, and wherein at least one of the physiological data and the data
`indicating an amount of exercise performeddateis received fromthe device which provides
`
`healthexercise-related information;
`
`d.
`
`sending the healthexercise-related information to an internet server via 4 wireless
`
`May 4, 2009 Amendmentand
`Response to Office Action
`
`“e. receiving a calculated response from
`a the server, the response associated
`with a calculation performed by the
`server based on the Reathexercise-
`related information; and”
`
`related information and displaying the response.
`
`network;
`
`
`
`@, receiving a calculated response from@theserver, the response associated witha
`
`calculation performed bythe server based on the heatthexercise-related information; and
`
`f.
`
`running an application in the web-enabled wireless
`
`phonefor receiving
`
`the exercise-
`
`Dkt. 338-8 at PNA-FB0001598.
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Net Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 9 of 82
`
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.g and 1.h
`
`Dkt. 338-9 at 4] 286.
`
`# fitbil
`
`3
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 10 of 82
`
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.g and 1.h
`
`B be
`
`sire
`
`Q. Right.
`
`plorioSOCeSYOVGe1
`
`os
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`Q=And then I think youjust
`referenced: Under claim element1h. the
`referenced calculation has to be performed by
`the server of element 1h. Right?
`A.
`So Lh states. "recemving a
`calculated response from the server.
`
`Andthat’sall I’m asking, is you haven't offered an infringement
`opinion based onthe interpretation that elements 1.g. and 1.h.
`can use different arrays of servers. Right?
`
`the
`
`-
`
`20
`21s
`»
`33s
`4
`
`Sete
`
`And soif the calculation of
`element 1h as performed bya device that's
`not a server. then that wouldn't be able to
`practice claum element 1h. Right?
`MR. CUSTER: Objection. Calls
`
`A. No, | have not offered an opinion of it that way.
`
`Dkt. 338-1 at 145:2-9.
`
`#fitbit
`
`9
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 11 of 82
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.g and 1.h
`
`US 6,272,333 Bl
`
`12. Asubscriber unit in a wireless communication system
`for controlling a delivery of data fromafixed portion ofthe
`wireless communication system,
`the subscriber unit com-
`prising:
`a receiver for receiving the data;
`a processing system coupled to the receiver for processing
`the data; and
`a transmitter coupled to the processing system for com-
`municaling with the fixed portion of the wireless com-
`munication system,
`wherein the processing system is programmedto;
`maintain an application registry comprising a list ofall
`software applications that are currently accessible to
`the subscriber wnil; and
`
`in response Os accessibility of an application,
`update the application registry; and
`control the transmilter 10 communicate the change to
`the fixed portion of the wircless communication
`system.
`
`
`
`the
`
`US 8,277,377 B2
`1. A method for interactive exercise monitoring,
`method comprising the steps cl:
`a. downloading an application to a web-enabled wireless
`phone directly from a remote server over the internet:
`. coupling the a web-enabled wireless phone to a device
`which provides exercise-related information;
`. rendering a user interface on the web-enabled wireless
`phone;
`using the appheation, recerving data indicating a physi-
`ologic status ofa subject:
`e. using the application,
`receiving data indicating an
`amount of exercise performed by the subject;
`f. wherein at least one of the data indicating a physiologic
`status of a subject or the data indicating an amountof
`exercise performed by the subject is received trom the
`device which provides exercise-relatedinformation, and.
`wherein the data indicating a physiclegic status ofa
`subject is receivedat least partially while the subjectis
`exercising:
`g. sending the exercise-related information to ¢
`Via a wireless network;
`server
`h. receiving a calculated response trom the
`response associated with a calculation performed by the
`serverbasedon the exercise-related information; and
`1. using the application, displaying the response.
`
`Mo torola 4 Oo b i} it V ;
`
`# FITOIL
`
`© a Wo WW 0 Ww
`
`10
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 12 of 82
`
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.g and 1.h
`
`“{T]he claim requires that ‘the change’ be communicated to the fixed portion
`of the wireless network. Since the only antecedentbasis for this change
`derives from the phrase ‘a changein accessibility, the change that causes an
`update to the application registry must be the same changethatis
`communicated to thefixed portion of the wireless network.
`Motorola Mobility LLC v. ITC, 553 Fed. Appx. 971, 975 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`#fitbil
`
`re
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 13 of 82
`
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.g and 1.h #fitbil
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 14 of 82
`
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.g and 1.h
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 15 of 82
`
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.g and 1.h fitoil
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain A Server That Performs Elements 1.g and 1.h
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 16 of 82
`
`° Claim 1 requires one server to perform all actions in elements 1.g and 1.h.
`
`° Philips’ expert did not opine that elements 1.g and 1.h could be performed by
`multiple different, non-overlapping server arrays.
`
`° The undisputed evidence showsthat the accused Fitbit products and system do not
`infringe because they cannotpractice elements 1.g and 1.h.
`
`
`
`#fitbil
`
`15
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 17 of 82
`
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.a, 1.g, and 1.h
`
`Fitbit Argument2
`
`(also presented in Dkt. 275).
`server”
`in elements1.a, 1.g, and 1.h
`
`#fitbil
`
`16
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 18 of 82
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.a, 1.g, and 1.h
`
`i. using the application, displaying the response.
`
`the
`
`1. A method for interactive exercise monitoring,
`method comprising the steps of:
`a. downloading an application to a web-enabled wireless
`
`
`phonedirectly fromaremoteserverover the internet;
`b, coupling the a web-enabled wireless phone to a device
`which provides exercise-related information;
`>. rendering a user interface on the web-enabled wireless
`phone;
`. using the application, receiving data indicating a physi-
`ologic status ofa subject;
`. using the application, receiving data indicating an
`amount ofexercise performed by the subject;
`. whereinat least one ofthe data indicating a physiologic
`status of a subject or the data indicating an amount of
`exercise performed by the subject is received from the
`device which providesexercise-related information, and
`wherein the data indicating a physiologic status ofa
`subject is receivedat least partially while the subjectis
`exercising;
`g. sending the exercise-related information toaninternet
`via a wireless network;
`h. receiving a calculated response from th
`response associated with a calculation performedbythe
`‘server based on the exercise-related information; and
`
`& FItoIL
`
`&
`
`Dkt. 338-3
`
`=
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 19 of 82
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.a, 1.g, and 1.h
`
`Method and Apparatus for Health and Disease Management Combining Patient Data Monitoring with Wireless Internet Connectivity
`
`TITLEOF THE INVENTION (280 characters max)
`
`—
`
`Witt Less
`INTERNET
`SYSTEM
`
`We R-ENRS LED
`WIRELESS
`DEWCE
`
`@ Fitbit Dkt. 338-14 at 5.
`
`INTEREACE
`oN
`| —~foapreR
`TE NeeXedD
`
`HERLIH- RELATED
`
`MONITORING
`DEVICE
`
`\
`
`18
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 20 of 82
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.a, 1.g, and 1.h
`
`roy
`
`.
`,
`LAST NAME
`QUY
`
`MIDDLE
`[INITIAL _
`
`RESIDENCE(CITY AND EITHERSTATE OR
`;
`FOREIGN COUNTRY) __
`Mill Valley, California USA
`
`INVENTOR(s)/APPLICANT(s)
`
`ay“Oeyete
`& FitbiL
`
`InternetconnectiontotheWorldWideWeb,The adventoftelevision sets with built-in
`
`
`connectionsto the Internet (e.g. WebTV) provided yet another embodiment. Various
`medical devices, such as a blood glucose monitor, blood pressure recorder, respiratory
`flow meter or ambulatory ECGrecorder, could be connected to the system. The data from
`the medical devices could control the display of information presented to the patient and
`be stored for reviewbya health care provider,
`
`TITLE OF THE INVENTION (280 characters max)
`
`Method and Apparatus for Health and Disease Management Combining Paticnt
`
`Data Monitoring with Wireless Internet Connectivity
`
`The initial embodimentof the previous inventions utilized a compact dise to provide
`
`interactive information for disease management.Insubsequenttheembodiments,
`
`
`19
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit System Does Not Contain
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 21 of 82
`A Server That Performs Elements 1.a, 1.g, and 1.h
`
`INV ENTOR({(s)/APPLICANT(s)
`|
`nadine MIDDLE|RESIDENCE(CITY AND EITHER STATE OR
`
`LASTNAME
`FIRST NAME
`INITIAL _
`;
`FOREIGN COUNTRY) __
`QUY
`Roger
`:
`Mill Valley, California USA
`
`|
`
`TITLE OF THE INVENTION (280 characters max)
`
`Method and Apparatus for Health and Disease Management Combining Paticnt
`
`Data Monitoring with Wireless Internet Connectivity
`
`
`
`The information supplied by
`health care web sites must be specially designed to suit the constraints of the small
`display sereens of WWDs,. However, the early adoption of such devices in Europe has
`demonstrated that their usc to display information derived from the web is acceptable to
`consumers,
`
`@ Fitoil
`
`Dkt. 338-14 at 3.
`
`20
`
`

`

`The AccusedFitbit System Does Not Perform
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 22 of 82
`
`A Calculation Based On Exercise-Related Information as Required by Element 1.h
`
`“calculation...based on the exercise-related information” in element 1.h Fitbit Argument 3
`
`(also presented in Dkt. 329: Fitbit’s MSJ of Non-Infringement)
`
`#fitbil
`
`21
`
`

`

`The AccusedFitbit System Does Not Perform
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 23 of 82
`A Calculation Based On Exercise-Related Information as Required by Element 1.h
`
`i. using the application, displaying the response.
`
`the
`
`1. A method for interactive exercise monitoring,
`method comprising the steps of:
`a. downloading an application to a web-enabled wireless
`phone directly from a remote server over the internet;
`. coupling the a web-enabled wireless phone to a device
`which provides exercise-related information;
`>. rendering a user interface on the web-enabled wireless
`phone;
`. using the application, receiving data indicating a physi-
`ologic status ofa subject;
`. using the application, receiving data indicating an
`amount ofexercise performed by the subject;
`. Whereinat least one ofthe data indicating a physiologic
`status of a subject or the data indicating an amount of
`exercise performed by the subject is received from the
`device which providesexercise-related information, and
`wherein the data indicating a physiologic status ofa
`subject is receivedat least partially while the subjectis
`exercising;
`. sending the exercise-related information to an internet
`server Via a wireless network:
`the
`. receiving a calculated response from the server,
`responseassociated with acalculationperformedby the
`
`
`serverbasedontheexercise-relatedinformation:and
`
`ide Fitboit
`
`Dkt. 338-3.
`
`3
`
`

`

`The AccusedFitbit System Does Not Perform
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 24 of 82
`
`A Calculation Based On Exercise-Related Information as Required by Element 1.h #fitoit
`
`

`

`Philips Has Not Shown That Any. Fitbit User Has Synced Data Via a Wireless Network as Required by Element1.g
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 25 of 82
`
`Fitbit Argument 4
`
`“wireless network”in element 1.g.
`
`#*fitbit
`
`24
`
`

`

`Philips Has Not Shown That AnyFitbit User Has
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 26 of 82
`Synced Data Via a Wireless Network as Required by Element 1.g
`
`i. using the application, displaying the response.
`
`the
`
`1. A method for interactive exercise monitoring,
`method comprising the steps of:
`a. downloading an application to a web-enabled wireless
`phone directly from a remote server over the internet;
`b, coupling the a web-enabled wireless phone to a device
`which provides exercise-related information;
`>. rendering a user interface on the web-enabled wireless
`phone;
`. using the application, receiving data indicating a physi-
`ologic status ofa subject;
`. using the application, receiving data indicating an
`amount ofexercise performed by the subject;
`. whereinat least one ofthe data indicating a physiologic
`status of a subject or the data indicating an amount of
`exercise performed by the subject is received from the
`device which providesexercise-related information, and
`wherein the data indicating a physiologic status ofa
`subject is receivedat least partially while the subjectis
`exercising;
`. sending the exercise-related information to an internet
`
`serverviaawirelessnetwork:
`. receiving a calculated response from the server,
`the
`response associated with a calculation performed by the
`server based on the exercise-related information; and
`
`& FItoIL
`
`&
`
`Dkt. 338-3
`
`zs
`
`

`

`The Applicant’s Attempts To Overcome Root And Brown During Prosecution Based
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 27 of 82
`On Location-Based Constraints Highlights How Wi-Fi Ils Not A Wireless Network
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[0015]-[0022],includingspecificadvantagesrespecttoexercise-relatedinformation.with As a
`
`ridetomonitor
`to aremote computerfor data storage and analysis (4:54-64).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`simple illustration, a person could not do with Brown’s device that which is intended by the
`
`
`
`claimed invention:forexample,acyclistcouldnottakeBrown’sdeviceonabike
`
`Regarding web-enablement, the only such aspect evenpotentially inferable is
`
`using an external computer via the serial or infrared port or using a remote computer via
`
`modem. Butthis inference would defeat the purpose of having a mobile device.
`
`Accordingly, Applicant submits that to cquate these with a web-cnabled wircless phonc is
`
`
`simply not supportable, especially astheclearpurposeoftheclaimeddeviceistobe
`
`
`
`carriedandusedwhileexercisingwithoutbeinglimitedtothelocationofaPCor
`
`telephonejack[0017]!In fact, Figs. 2-3 of Root showthe user exercising with no
`
`
`
`
`
`connections indicated, and Figs. 7-9 showthe monitor alone being connected to a PCor
`
`= fitoil
`
`26
`
`

`

`Cardio Fitness Score and Cardio Fitness Leve! are not a. “Response” as Required by
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 28 of 82
`
`Element 1.h
`
`Fitbit Argument 5
`
`“response”in element 1.h.
`
`#fitbil
`
`27
`
`

`

`Philips Has Not Shown That AnyFitbit User Has Rendered a User Interface as
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 29 of 82
`
`Required by Element1.c
`
`Fitbit Argument 6
`
`“rendering a user interface” in element 1.c
`
`#fitbil
`
`28
`
`

`

`Philips Has Not Shown That Any. Fitbit User Has Rendered a User Interface as
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 30 of 82
`
`Required by Element1.c
`
`“(W]e have held that it is not enough to simply show that a productis capable
`of infringement; the patent owner must show evidenceof specific instances
`of direct infringement.”
`
`Fujitsu Ltd. V. Netgear Inc., 620 F.3d 1321, 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
`
`“In order to prove direct infringement, a patentee must either point to
`specific instances of direct infringement or show that the accused device
`necessarily infringes the patent in suit.”
`ACCO Brands,Inc. v. ABA Locks Mfr. Co., 501 F.3d 1307, 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2007).
`
`

`

`Philips Has No Evidence That Any Fitbit User Has Ever Performed the Accused Method
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 31 of 82
`
`Fitbit Argument 7
`
`Philips Has No Evidence That AnyFitbit User Has Ever Performed the Accused Method
`
`(also presented in Dkt. 331: Fitbit’s MSJ of Non-Infringementfor Failure of Proof)
`
`#fitbil
`
`30
`
`

`

`The Accused Fitbit Products Do Not Necessarily infringe
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 32 of 82
`
` Fitbit Argument7(a)
`
`The AccusedFitbit Products Do Not Necessarily Infringe
`
`#fitbil
`
`31
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 33 of 82
`The Accused Fitbit Products Bo Not Necessarily infringe
`
`Ve
`
`Steps Required for Direct Infringement
`
`188.
`
`_-—-—
`Based onthe above. I conclude that claims 1, 6. 9, and 12 of the "377
`
`Patent are
`
`infringed whenthe following steps are performed:
`
`1-Cand 1-I)
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`The FitbitApp is downloaded onto a smartphone (meeting limitation I-A).
`
`The *377 Device is paired to a smartphone using the Fitbit App (meeting limitation
`
`1-B).
`
`The °377 Device synes with the Fitbit App while being worn bythe user while
`
`exercising (meeting limitations 1-D through 1-H as well as limitations 4. 5. 6. 9.
`
`and 12)
`
`The Cardio Fitness Score page is displayed on the Fitbit App (meeting limitations
`
` fitbil
`
`Dkt 338-2 at 4] 188.
`
`32
`
`

`

`Philips Has No Evidence of Any Fitbit User Performing Aili Elements of the Claims
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 34 of 82
`
`DEFENDANTFITBIT LLC’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR
`SUMMARYJUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENTOFU.S. PATENTNO.8,277,377
`BASED ON PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE OF PROOF
`
`
`
`
`1 at 238:20-241:24. 249:18-250:3,)
`
`17.
`
`Fitbit’s users can viewtheir Cardio Fitness Score and Cardio Fitness Level in the
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC’S OPPOSITION TO FITBIT,
`LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT OF
`Fitbit application on an iPad or Android tablet using all eight Fitbit wearables.
`NONINFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.8,277,377 BASED ON
`ma
`PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE OF PROOF
`ee ey
`
`18._—_Fitbit’s users can viewtheir Cardio Fitness Score and Cardio Fitness Levelin the
`
`(Ex. 4. 9 21: see
`
`Reply to Fitbit’s Statementof Allegedly Undisputed Material Facts
`
`Fact 17-21. These Facts are undisputed.
`
`Fitbit application on a Windows 10 PC using sevenofthe eight Fitbit wearables—the Alta HR.
`Blaze. Charge 3. Inspire HR. Ionic. Versa. and Versa Lite.
`(Ex. 4, 9 22: see a/so Ex. 10. 99 162.
`163.)
`
`Fitbit’s users can viewtheir Cardio Fitness Score and Cardio Fitness Level on the
`19.
`face of the Ionic. Versa. Versa Lite, and Versa 2.
`(Ex.
`1 at 240:11-18: Ex. 10. § 164.)
`
`20,
`
`Fitbit instructs its users that they mayuse the eight Fitbit wearables with the Fitbit
`
`applicationoneither a smartphone. tablet. and/or Windows 10 PC. (See, e.g., Ex. 20 at 299 (stating
`
`that Alta HR users mayuse Fitbit application on a smartphone. tablet, or Windows 10 PC): Ex. 21
`
`at 463 (same Re: Blaze): Ex. 36 at SS1-3 (same Re: Charge 3): Ex, 22 at 783-4 (same Re: Inspire
`
`HR); Ex. 23 at 157 (same Re: Ionic): Ex. 24 at 1110-2 (same Re: Versa): Ex. 26 at 1045-7 (same
`
`Re: Versa Lite): Ex. 25 at 966-7 (stating that Versa 2 users mayuse Fitbit application on a
`
`smartphoneor tablet).)
`
`21.
`
`Viewing a Cardio Fitness Score or Cardio Fitness Level ona tablet. PC, or the face
`
`of a Fitbit wearable does not infringe the "377 patent.
`
`(Ex.
`
`sit Fitbit
`
`Dkt. 332 at 4-5.
`
`33
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 35 of 82
`The Accused Fitbit Products Bo Not Necessarily infringe
`
`Replyto Fitbit’s Statement of Allegedly Undisputed Material Facts
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC’S OPPOSITION TO FITBIT,
`DEFENDANTFITBIT LLC’S MEMORANDUMIN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR
`;
`LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT OF
`SUMMARYJUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENTOFU.S. PATENT NO.8,277,377
`NONINFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,277,377 BASED ON
`BASED ON PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE OF PROOF
`eeeeeeeePLAINTIFF’S FAILURE OF PROOF
`
`Il.
`
`Dkt. 332 at 4.
`
`# Fitoit
`
`Dkt. 363 at 2.
`
`34
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 36 of 82
`Y= lael ecnliat-a-Vie (Jinn emOT
`Mali Matem em ae (-ac eymAMalde)lia
`
`ts
`
`Steps Required for Direct Infringement
`
`188.
`
`Based onthe above. I conclude that claims 1. 6, 9, and 12 of the °377 Patent are
`
`infringed whenthe following steps are performed:
`
`The Fitbit App is downloaded onto a smartphone (meeting limitation 1-A).
`
`The 377 Device is paired to a smartphone using the FitbitApp (meeting limitation
`
`1-B).
`
`1-Cand 1-I)
`
`The °377 Device syncs with the Fitbit App while being worn bythe user while
`
`exercising (meeting limitations 1-D through 1-H as well as limitations 4. 5. 6. 9.
`
`and 12)
`
`The Cardio Fitness Score page is displayed on the Fitbit App (meeting limitations
`
`#fitbil
`
`Dkt 338-2 at J 188.
`
`35
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 37 of 82
`The Accused Fitbit Products Bo Not Necessarily infringe
`
`DEFENDANTFITBIT LLC’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENTOFU.S. PATENT NO.8,277,377
`BASED ON PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE OF PROOF
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC'S OPPOSITION TO FITBIT,
`LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT OF
`;
`NONINFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,277,377 BASED ON
`PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE OF PROOF
`
`Replyto Fitbit’s Statement of Allegedly Undisputed Material Facts
`
`Il.
`
` fitbil
`
`J)
`U o)
`Dkt. 363
`
`~]
`r
`at 2.
`
`36
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 38 of 82
`
`Philips Has No Evidence of Any Fitbit User Performing Aili Elements of the Claims # fFitoit
`
`

`

`Philips Has No Evidence of Any Fitbit User Performing Aii Elements of the Claims
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 39 of 82
`
`Fitbit Argument 7(b)
`#fitbil
`
`
`Philips Has No Evidence of AnyFitbit User Performing All Elements of Claim 1
`
`38
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 40 of 82
`
`|
`
`MICSwetted
`Products
`Step 1? Step2? Step3? Step 4?
`x
`x
`
`Fitbit’s user manuals and advertisements (Dkt. 341, 14] 8, 9)
`
`x
`
`x
`
`Dr. Paradiso testimony regarding cell phones (Dkt. 341, 94] 6, 7)
`
`All
`
`Fitbit Help page Re: Connected GPS(Dkt. 341, 4] 79)
`
`Alta HR,lonic
`
`| Fitbit community forum postings (Dkt. 341, 14] 69)
`
`Music Control, Live Dash, Notifications, Quick Replies
`(Dkt. 363 at 5-9)
`
`All but Charge 2,
`Versa, lonic
`
`All but Charge 2
`
`Academic studies (Dkt. 341, 9 73-76)
`
`All but Charge 2
`
`x
`
`x
`
`Alleged Evid
`ertyade
`Data regarding Fitbit device pairings with Fitbit app (Dkt. 341, 4 14)
`
`Philips Has No Evidence of Any Fitbit User Performing Aii Elements of the Claims |
` Fitbit surveys (Dkt. 341, 9] 66-68)
`
`
`test
`
`R
`
`K
`
`yan Kremstestimony(
`# fitbil
`
`Dkt. 341
`
`,1"0
`
`70-72
`
`)
`
`Alta HR, Charge
`as VereaiLite
`;
`
`nnn a
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 41 of 82
`Philips Has No Evidence of Any Fitbit User Performing Aii Elements of the Claims
`
`
`
`Fitbit’s Corresponding Argumentsre
`
`“Fitbit community pages are inadmissible hearsay. Fed. R.
`Evid. 801(c), 802.” (Dkt. 332 at 15.)
`
`Evidence of Noninfringement
`
`
`Garmin Court’s NoninfrinsementFindings
`(No,.19-C\ 06301, Dkt. 164, June 8, 2022)
`
`“Further, Plaintiff’s cited forum postis
`inadmissible hearsay and only showsthat a user
`could split the exercise up into separate
`activities, not that the user actually did.” (Dkt.
`164 at 16.)
`
`“The problem is that Dr. Martin presents no evidencethat any|
`one user of any of the eight Fitbit wearables has ever
`
`“Dr. Martin’s testimony cited by Plaintiff shows—performed thosefour steps in the required order, or that
`that the accused watchesare only capable of
`users of those eight Fitbit wearables necessarily perform
`infringing, which is insufficient to create a
`those four steps in the required order. (See Ex. 1 at 249:18-
`genuine dispute of material fact.” /d.
`250:3 (admitting that Fitbit users are not required to practice
`claim 1); Ex. 2, 1] 238-258 (no evidence of any user
`performing Dr. Martin’s steps 1-4 in order).)” (Dkt. 332 at 11.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`#fitbil
`
`40
`
`

`

`Philips Has No Evidence of Any Fitbit User Performing Aii Elements of the Claims
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 42 of 82
`
`Fitbit’s Cited Cases (E-Pass., ACCO Brands)
`
`Philips’s cited cases (Moleculon, Lucent, Toshiba)
`
`Non-infringement at SJ stage requiredif:
`
`Showinginfringement at SJ stage requires evidence of:
`
`1) Evidence only shows performanceof certain claim
`stepsin isolation, but not all claim steps in required
`order (E-Pass) or
`
`2) Evidence showsinstructions for infringing and
`non-infringing methods with no preference for
`infringing method (ACCO Brands).
`
`1)
`
`Extensive sales and either:
`
`2.a) Instructions to practice all claim steps and no
`instructions teaching non-infringing uses
`(Moleculon, Lucent) or
`
`2.b) Instructions teaching infringing and non-infringing
`uses plus instructions not to use the non-
`infringing method (Toshiba).
`
`#fitbil
`
`41
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 43 of 82
`Philips Has No Evidence of Any Fitbit User Performing Aii Elements of the Claims
`
`NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.8,277,377 BY FITBIT IONIC, SURGE, VERSA, VERSA 2, VERSA LITE EDITION, CHARGE,
`CHARGE HR, CHARGE 2, CHARGE3, INSPIRE, INSPIRE HR, ALTA, ALTA HR, FLEX, FLEX 2, ACE, ACE 2, ZIP, BLAZE, FORCE, ONE
`(“FITBIT ACCUSED PRODUCTS”)
`
`EXHIBIT E4
`
`Fitbit Accused Products do not performthe step of “sending the exercise-related
`[1g] “g. sending the exercise-related
`informationto an internet server via a_|informationto an internet servervia a wireless network.”
`wireless network:”
`
`Philips’ Infringement Charts do not demonstrate that this limitation is met by each of the
`Fitbit Accused Products. Fitbit does not performorcontrol anyof the steps taken.if atall.
`by a mobile phoneuser, andis not in a legal agencyorjoint enterprise relationship with the
`actors alleged to perform, if at all,
`the method step of “sending the exercise-related
`informationto an internet server via a wireless network.”
`
`exercise-related information.
`
`Fitbit Accused Products do not performthe step of “receiving a calculated response from
`[1h] “h. receiving a calculated
`response fromthe server. the response|the server. the response associated with a calculation performed bythe server based onthe
`associated with a calculation
`exercise-related information.”
`performed bythe server based on the
`exercise-related information: and”
`
`Philips* Infringement Charts do not demonstrate that this limitation is met by each ofthe
`Fitbit Accused Products, Fitbit does not performorcontrol anyof the steps taken. if at all.
`by a mobile phoneuser. and is not in a legal agencyorjoint enterprise relationship with the
`actors alleged to perform,ifat all. the method step of receiving a calculated response from
`the server. the response associated with a calculation performed bythe server based onthe
`
`sii fitoit
`
`42
`
`

`

`1.h
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 392 Filed 07/12/22 Page 44 of 82
`Fitbit Timely Disclosed That its Servers Do Not Practice Elements 1
`
`
`G. Boccon-Gibod - Confidental
`MR. BECKWITH: Sure
`THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Off the record
`at 10:05 a.m.
`(Recess takenfrom 10:05 a.m.
`10:14 a.m.)
`THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Baek on the
`record at 10:14 am
`BY MR. RODRIGUES
`qa”
`Q. Welcome back, Mr, Boccon-Gibod.
`11 Let me make sure this documentthat we had
`
`to
`
`Page 48
`Ponnwradp—
`12 marked as Exhibit 1 is back on the screen.
`
`Page 49
`
`G: Boccon-Gibod « Confidential
`1
`2 designated today for -- sorry, | — let me
`2 start that again.
`Dcyou understan¢ that you're
`.
`
`designatedtoday on Topic. 23 subsection
`
`I’d like to turn to Topic 23, subsection (b), which reads, “The transfer of
`data between the Fitbit app or fitbit.com dashboard and Fibit’s servers
`including the identity of the data transferred, the frequency of said data
`transfers, the form in whichsaid data is transferred, the mediums used
`in the transfer of said data and the authentication of said data.”
`
`Do you see that?
`
`Yes.
`
`... DO you understand that you’re designated today on Topic 23
`subsection (b)?
`
`| do.
`
`And whatdid you do to prepareto give testimony on Topic 23
`subsection (b) today?
`
`To how our products work.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 i
`
`lolscussedwith FRRIE legal
`&.
`it
`cdunsel ane refreshed my memory:
`12
`@, Andiwhen you say you refreshed
`18
`14 your memery, you refreshed your memory with
`| discussed with Fitbit legal counsel and refreshed my memory.
`iS respect to what?
`16
`A,
`Te how our products work,
`
`17=@,,_ I'm going to go downto Section
`18 23, subsection (¢), which reads, “The
`And when you say you refreshed your memory, you refreshed your
`18 calculations of any outputs that are
`20 displayedion the accused devices,the
`21 Fitbit app, or the fitbit.com dashboard
`memory with respect to what?
`22 i