throbber
Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 325 Filed 02/23/22 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`FITBIT LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11586-FDS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION TO IMPOUND/SEAL DESIGNATED MATERIAL
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2 and the Order Adopting Discovery Stipulation and Modified
`
`Protective Order in this case (“Protective Order”), ECF No. 59, Defendant Fitbit LLC (“Fitbit”),
`
`respectfully requests the Court to impound (seal) an un-redacted copy of Defendant Fitbit LLC’s
`
`Memorandum In Opposition To Philips’ Motion To Preclude The Testimony Of Dr. Joseph A.
`
`Paradiso Regarding The iFit Prior Art System (Dkt. 305) (“Memorandum”) along with Exhibits 1
`
`and 3 filed in support of the Memorandum. Plaintiff Philips North America LLC (“Philips) does
`
`not oppose this Motion to Impound/Seal.
`
`The Protective Order allows parties to designate discovery material that contains or
`
`constitutes confidential business information as “CONFIDENTIAL.” As grounds for this Motion,
`
`Fitbit states that Exhibits 1 and 3 contain third party confidential business information. In response
`
`to a subpoena, Icon Health & Fitness (“Icon”), a third party to this matter, produced documents
`
`related to the design and operation of several of their fitness products and services and marked
`
`these documents as confidential under the Protective Order. Icon likewise designated the transcript
`
`of the deposition of one of their employees, Ms. Colleen Logan, as confidential under the
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 325 Filed 02/23/22 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`Protective Order. Exhibit 1 is an excerpted version of the transcript of this deposition. Exhibit 3
`
`is a copy of Exhibit 16 from Ms. Logan’s deposition, which was produced by Icon in response to
`
`Exhibit 2, Fitbit’s subpoena and concerns the design and operation of their proprietary iFit.com
`
`system.
`
`Additionally, Fitbit has filed a redacted version of its Memorandum with redactions
`
`because the Memorandum contains discussions about Icon Health and Fitness’s confidential
`
`business information such as, for example, discussions about the contents of Exhibits 1 and 3.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Fitbit respectfully requests that the Court permit Fitbit to file a
`
`public redacted version of the Memorandum. Further, Fitbit respectfully requests that the Court
`
`permit Fitbit to file an un-redacted copy of the foregoing Memorandum along with Exhibits 1 and
`
`3 filed in support of its Memorandum under seal. Fitbit further requests that the documents remain
`
`impounded until further Order by the Court, and that upon expiration of the impoundment, the
`
`documents be returned to Fitbit’s counsel.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 325 Filed 02/23/22 Page 3 of 4
`
`Dated: February 23, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`/s/David J. Shaw
`David J. Shaw (pro hac vice)
`dshaw@desmaraisllp.com
`DESMARAIS LLP
`1701 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 200
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`Telephone: (202) 451-4900
`Facsimile: (202) 451-4901
`
`Leslie M. Spencer (pro hac vice)
`lspencer@desmaraisllp.com
`Karim Z. Oussayef (pro hac vice)
`koussayef@desmaraisllp.com
`Brian D. Matty (pro hac vice)
`bmatty@desmaraisllp.com
`Henry Ard (pro hac vice)
`hard@desmaraisllp.com
`Eric G. Speckhard
`especkhard@desmaraisllp.com
`DESMARAIS LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Telephone: (212) 351-3400
`Facsimile: (212) 351-3401
`
`Ameet A. Modi (pro hac vice)
`amodi@desmaraisllp.com
`DESMARAIS LLP
`101 California Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 573-1900
`Facsimile: (415) 573-1901
`
`Gregory F. Corbett (BBO #646394)
`gcorbett@wolfgreenfield.com
`Elizabeth A. DiMarco (BBO #681921)
`edimarco@wolfgreenfield.com
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02110
`Telephone: (617) 646-8000
`Facsimile: (617) 646-8646
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Fitbit LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 325 Filed 02/23/22 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1(A)(2)
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel for Fitbit conferred with counsel for Philips
`and attempted in good faith to resolve or narrow the issues in dispute on February 8, 2022, but was
`unable to do so.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ David J. Shaw
`David J. Shaw
`
`
`CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 37.1
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel for Fitbit has complied with the provisions
`of Local Rule 37.1.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ David J. Shaw
`David J. Shaw
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that this document is being filed through the Court’s electronic filing system,
`
`which serves counsel for other parties who are registered participants as identified on the Notice
`of Electronic Filing (NEF). Any counsel for other parties who are not registered participants are
`being served by first class mail on the date of the electronic filing.
`
`
`
`/s/ Elizabeth A. DiMarco
`Elizabeth A. DiMarco
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket