throbber
Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-9 Filed 02/23/22 Page 1 of 7
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-9 Filed 02/23/22 Page 1 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`EXHIBIT 9
`
`
`
`

`

`FITBIT
`
`JOSEPH PARADISO
`
`In the Matter Of:
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLCvs
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-9 Filed 02/23/22 Page 2 of 7
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-9 Filed 02/23/22 Page 2 of 7
`
`February 02, 2022
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-9 Filed 02/23/22 Page 3 of 7
`
`218
`
`·1· · · · ·J. PARADISO - CONFIDENTIAL
`
`·2· ·these are the elements that I use to rebut
`
`·3· ·Philips.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· · And in paragraph 3, you list
`
`·5· ·three different non-infringing alternatives
`
`·6· ·to the asserted claims, is that right?
`
`·7· · · ·A.· · Yes, I do.
`
`·8· · · ·Q.· · Did you answer the question,
`
`·9· ·Dr. Paradiso?· I didn't hear you.· I'm
`
`10· ·sorry.
`
`11· · · ·A.· · Yes, I do.
`
`12· · · ·Q.· · Okay.· Apologies.
`
`13· · · · · · ·And your report does not offer an
`
`14· ·opinion as to any author non-infringing
`
`15· ·alternatives besides the three listed here,
`
`16· ·is that right?
`
`17· · · ·A.· · That's correct.· These are the
`
`18· ·ones.
`
`19· · · ·Q.· · Okay.
`
`20· · · · · · ·And paragraph 4 of your report
`
`21· ·talks about your opinion as to whether
`
`22· ·Philips licenses to SimCare and LifeScan
`
`23· ·are technically comparable to the
`
`24· ·hypothetical license regarding the '377
`
`25· ·Patent between Philips and Fitbit, is that
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-9 Filed 02/23/22 Page 4 of 7
`
`282
`
`·1· · · · ·J. PARADISO - CONFIDENTIAL
`
`·2· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· We are now
`
`·3· · · ·going off the record.· The time is
`
`·4· · · ·5:11.
`
`·5· · · · · · ·(Recess taken from 5:11 p.m. to
`
`·6· · · ·5:17 p.m. EST)
`
`·7· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· We are now
`
`·8· · · ·back on the record.· The time is 5:17.
`
`·9· ·BY MR. CUSTER:
`
`10· · · ·Q.· · I should probably share my screen
`
`11· ·again, I suppose.
`
`12· · · · · · ·All right.· Is my screen sharing?
`
`13· · · ·A.· · Yes.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· · Great.
`
`15· · · · · · ·Let's turn to paragraph 337.
`
`16· ·This is on page 142.
`
`17· · · ·A.· · Let me find it in my copy.· 142.
`
`18· · · ·Q.· · 142 is the page.· 337 is the
`
`19· ·paragraph.
`
`20· · · ·A.· · I see it.
`
`21· · · ·Q.· · Great.
`
`22· · · · · · ·And here you mention a
`
`23· ·conversation with Mr. Gilles Boccon-Gibod?
`
`24· · · ·A.· · Gilles, I believe so.
`
`25· · · ·Q.· · Oh, Gilles.
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-9 Filed 02/23/22 Page 5 of 7
`
`283
`
`·1· · · · ·J. PARADISO - CONFIDENTIAL
`
`·2· · · ·A.· · Gilles Boccon-Gibod.· I used to
`
`·3· ·speak a little more French than I do now.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· · No, I appreciate it.· I like
`
`·5· ·being able to say it correctly.
`
`·6· · · ·A.· · Gilles, yeah.
`
`·7· · · ·Q.· · Okay.
`
`·8· · · · · · ·So this conversation with
`
`·9· ·Mr. Boccon-Gibod -- and I apologize that I
`
`10· ·don't speak French -- but this conversation
`
`11· ·with Mr. Boccon-Gibod, when did that take
`
`12· ·place?
`
`13· · · ·A.· · That took place around the same
`
`14· ·time as my other conversation and -- yeah.
`
`15· ·It was a few months ago more or less.· It
`
`16· ·was before the report, preparation of the
`
`17· ·report.
`
`18· · · ·Q.· · Sure.
`
`19· · · · · · ·And did you just have one
`
`20· ·conversation with Mr. Boccon-Gibod?
`
`21· · · ·A.· · Yes, I did.
`
`22· · · ·Q.· · And how long was that
`
`23· ·conversation approximately?
`
`24· · · ·A.· · Oh, I don't know, maybe a half
`
`25· ·hour, something like that.· I don't
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-9 Filed 02/23/22 Page 6 of 7
`
`284
`
`·1· · · · ·J. PARADISO - CONFIDENTIAL
`
`·2· ·remember exactly.
`
`·3· · · ·Q.· · And did you discuss anything with
`
`·4· ·him that is not disclosed in this report?
`
`·5· · · ·A.· · No.· It's all here.
`
`·6· · · ·Q.· · Okay, great.
`
`·7· · · · · · ·Did you identify Mr. Boccon-Gibod
`
`·8· ·as someone you wanted to have a
`
`·9· ·conversation with?
`
`10· · · ·A.· · Can you repeat your question?
`
`11· · · ·Q.· · Sure.
`
`12· · · · · · ·Did you identify Mr. Boccon-Gibod
`
`13· ·as someone you wanted to have a
`
`14· ·conversation with?
`
`15· · · ·A.· · Yes.· He gave testimony that's
`
`16· ·relevant to the case and I wanted to speak
`
`17· ·to him myself.
`
`18· · · ·Q.· · Okay.
`
`19· · · · · · ·And then let's turn two pages
`
`20· ·above paragraph 331 on page 140.
`
`21· · · · · · ·Do you see that?
`
`22· · · ·A.· · One second.· Yes, I see it.
`
`23· · · ·Q.· · All right.
`
`24· · · · · · ·And here you discuss a
`
`25· ·conversation you had with a Robert Buddy
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-9 Filed 02/23/22 Page 7 of 7
`
`285
`
`·1· · · · ·J. PARADISO - CONFIDENTIAL
`
`·2· ·Herkenham, is that right?
`
`·3· · · ·A.· · That's true.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· · Okay.
`
`·5· · · · · · ·And when was the conversation
`
`·6· ·with Mr. Herkenham?
`
`·7· · · ·A.· · Same time period as the others,
`
`·8· ·order of a few months ago.· Don't remember
`
`·9· ·exactly.
`
`10· · · ·Q.· · And again, was it just the one
`
`11· ·conversation?
`
`12· · · ·A.· · Yes, I only had one conversation
`
`13· ·with him.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· · Did you discuss anything with
`
`15· ·Mr. Herkenham that's not disclosed in your
`
`16· ·report?
`
`17· · · ·A.· · It's all here.
`
`18· · · ·Q.· · Okay, great.
`
`19· · · · · · ·And did you identify
`
`20· ·Mr. Herkenham as another person you wanted
`
`21· ·to have a conversation with?
`
`22· · · ·A.· · Yes.· He was a person of interest
`
`23· ·for me.
`
`24· · · ·Q.· · And I didn't ask it about
`
`25· ·Mr. Smith, but was he also a person of
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket