throbber
Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-4 Filed 02/23/22 Page 1 of 7
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-4 Filed 02/23/22 Page 1 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`
`
`

`

`Philips North America LLC vs
`
`FitBit
`
`FITBIT, INC.
`
`In the Matter Of:
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-4 Filed 02/23/22 Page 2 of 7
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-4 Filed 02/23/22 Page 2 of 7
`
`January 20, 2021
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-4 Filed 02/23/22 Page 3 of 7
`
`71
`
`· · · ·R. KREMS - CONFIDENTIAL
`
`· · · · · Do you see that topic?
`
`· · A.· · Are there page numbers on this
`
`document?· I see it in your screen, but I
`
`was just -- it does not appear that this
`
`was generated with page numbers.· So I am
`
`on page 7 of the PDF.
`
`· · · · · Okay, I'm here, yes.
`
`· · Q.· · But unfortunately, it does not
`
`appear to have page numbers.· So I did want
`
`you to read along with me as I read that.
`
`· · A.· · Yeah, maybe we can go through it
`
`again.· I'm looking also on the document
`
`here next to the screen.
`
`· · Q.· · Sure.· So I wanted to focus in on
`
`Topic No. 5.· I'm going to scroll up so you
`
`can see the heading here is "Deposition
`
`Topics."
`
`· · · · · Do you see that?
`
`· · A.· · I do.
`
`· · Q.· · So going down to Topic No. 5, it
`
`reads, "The facts and circumstances
`
`surrounding any investigations, analyses,
`
`or efforts relating to any attempts to,
`
`plans to, and/or analyses of ways to design
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-4 Filed 02/23/22 Page 4 of 7
`
`72
`
`· · · ·R. KREMS - CONFIDENTIAL
`
`around any claim of any of the asserted
`
`patents, and the results of such
`
`investigations, analyses, or efforts,
`
`including whether and why any design-around
`
`alternative was incorporated into any
`
`accused product."
`
`· · · · · Do you see that topic?
`
`· · A.· · I do.
`
`· · Q.· · Okay.
`
`· · · · · Do you understand that you've
`
`been designated as a witness on this topic?
`
`· · · · · MR. BECKWITH:· So I'm going to
`
`· · interpose an objection.· Fitbit has
`
`· · objected to your Topic 5 as drafted.
`
`· · Mr. Krems is being produced to testify
`
`· · only as to, on that topic as to
`
`· · non-infringing alternatives only, and
`
`· · he's also being identified subject to
`
`· · all of the objections that Fitbit
`
`· · raised concerning how you drafted
`
`· · Topic 5.
`
`BY MR. RODRIGUES:
`
`· · Q.· · With the objections of counsel,
`
`do you understand that you're designated,
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-4 Filed 02/23/22 Page 5 of 7
`
`73
`
`· · · ·R. KREMS - CONFIDENTIAL
`
`at least in part, for Topic No. 5?
`
`· · · · · MR. BECKWITH:· As to
`
`· · non-infringing alternatives.
`
`BY MR. RODRIGUES:
`
`· · Q.· · As to non-infringing
`
`alternatives.
`
`· · · · · MR. BECKWITH:· Yeah, the witness
`
`· · can answer.
`
`· · A.· · I do.
`
`· · Q.· · Okay.
`
`· · · · · What can you tell me about
`
`non-infringing alternatives to the asserted
`
`patents, to the extent you've been prepared
`
`on that topic?
`
`· · · · · MR. BECKWITH:· Object to the form
`
`· · of the question as calling for a
`
`· · narrative.· It's compound.
`
`· · A.· · Maybe you can narrow the patent
`
`that you would like to get a response on
`
`specifically.
`
`· · Q.· · Sure.· Let me go back, actually,
`
`and ask you:· With respect to
`
`non-infringing alternatives, which is what
`
`your counsel has represented you've been
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-4 Filed 02/23/22 Page 6 of 7
`
`74
`
`· · · ·R. KREMS - CONFIDENTIAL
`
`prepared for with respect to this topic,
`
`what did you do to prepare to provide
`
`testimony with respect to non-infringing
`
`alternatives as covered by Topic 5?
`
`· · A.· · So for this, I mean, of course
`
`review of this document with legal counsel,
`
`in general.· And then discussions of the,
`
`you know, reviewing the alternatives or the
`
`non-infringing options and discussions --
`
`I'm sorry -- discussions against each of
`
`the patents.
`
`· · Q.· · So is it fair to say that the
`
`information you have with respect to
`
`non-infringing alternatives would be
`
`gleaned from your counsel?
`
`· · · · · MR. BECKWITH:· Object to the form
`
`· · of the question.· I'll instruct the
`
`· · witness not to answer concerning any
`
`· · communications you've had with
`
`· · counsel.· You can answer vis-a-vis
`
`· · your knowledge of how the products
`
`· · work.
`
`· · A.· · So while reviewing each of these
`
`patents and the use cases therein, the
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 319-4 Filed 02/23/22 Page 7 of 7
`
`75
`
`· · · ·R. KREMS - CONFIDENTIAL
`
`reviews are my interpretations of how we
`
`would change the development model or use
`
`case against those or, you know, reviewed
`
`and discussed.
`
`· · Q.· · Besides discussing with counsel,
`
`did you do anything else to prepare to give
`
`testimony with respect to non-infringing
`
`alternatives?
`
`· · A.· · No.
`
`· · Q.· · I'd like to move on to Topic 10.
`
`· · · · · Do you see Topic 10 on your
`
`screen?
`
`· · A.· · Yes.
`
`· · Q.· · And Topic 10 reads, "The facts
`
`and circumstances surrounding any claim for
`
`indemnification or potential
`
`indemnification Fitbit has made or will
`
`make relating to this action, including the
`
`entity from which indemnification was, is,
`
`or will be sought or to which
`
`indemnification was, is, or will be given."
`
`· · · · · Do you see that?
`
`· · A.· · I do.
`
`· · Q.· · Do you understand that you're
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket