throbber
Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 1 of 11
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS 
`

`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, 
`Plaintiff, 


`v. 
`FITBIT, INC. 
`Defendant. 
`

`

`

`

`
`     Civil Action No. 1:19‐cv‐11586‐IT 
`

`
`NOTICE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 
`September 17, 2019 
`
`In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Local Rules 16.11 (as modified by this 
`
`order) and 16.6 (for patent cases),2 an initial scheduling conference will be held in 
`
`Courtroom 9 on the 3rd floor of the John Joseph Moakley United States Courthouse 
`
`in Boston, Massachusetts on November 4, 2019, at 2:30 p.m.  
`
`The court considers attendance of lawyers ultimately responsible for the case to 
`
`be of the utmost importance.  Counsel for the plaintiff(s) is responsible for ensuring that 
`
`all parties and/or their attorneys who have not filed an answer or appearance with the 
`
`court are notified of the date of the scheduling conference. 
`
`The court expects compliance with sections (b), (c), and (d) of L.R. 16.1 and L.R. 
`
`16.6 (for patent cases) as modified below: 
`
`1.
`
`Scheduling Order: In most cases, the court will issue a scheduling order at the 
`conference in the form attached hereto. The court may depart from the form in 
`cases of relative complexity or simplicity or otherwise if justice so requires. The 
`parties should attempt to agree on the relevant dates for discovery and motion 
`practice.  In a case of ordinary complexity, the parties should propose a schedule 
`that calls for the completion of fact discovery, expert discovery, and motion 
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 2 of 11
`
`practice less than one calendar year from the date of the scheduling conference. 
`The dates of the status conference and pretrial conference will be set by the court. 
`

`Settlement Proposals: Each defendant shall present to the plaintiff(s) a written 
`response to the plaintiff(s)= settlement proposal(s) no later than seven days prior 
`to the scheduling conference. 

`Initial Disclosures: In addition to the information required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 
`26(a)(1) and L.R. 26.2, initial disclosures shall include:  
`
`a.
`
`Sworn statements disclosing the information set forth in L.R. 26.1(B)(1)(b)‐
`(d) and (2)(a)‐(c); 
`
`b.
`
`A copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents, 
`data compilations, and tangible things in the possession, custody, or 
`control of the party with substantial relevance to disputed facts alleged 
`with particularity in the pleadings. 

`Pending Motions: The parties= joint statement shall identify all pending motions. 
`Counsel shall be prepared to argue pending motions at the scheduling 
`conference. 

`Reassignment to a Magistrate Judge: The parties’ joint statement shall indicate 
`whether all parties consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for 
`all purposes.  If all parties consent, the parties should also jointly file a completed 
`“Consent/Refusal of Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction” form available at 
`http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/resources/forms‐local.htm. 
`
`-2-
`
`2.
`
`3.
`

`

`
`4.
`
`5.
`






`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 3 of 11
`
`Client Signatures:  Clients should hand sign the certificate of consultation filed 
`pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(d)(3).  Counsel may sign with a typed signature so 
`long as counsel is registered to use the court’s CM/ECF system. 

`


`


`Indira Talwani 
`United States District Judge 
`

`
`     By: /s/Gail A. MacDonald Marchione   

`Courtroom Deputy Clerk 
`
`6.
`

`
`Date:  September 17, 2019  
`

`
`
` These sections of Local Rule 16.1 provide: 
`
`  1
`

`(b) Obligation of Counsel to Confer. Unless otherwise ordered by the judge, counsel for 
`the parties must, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), confer at least 21 days before the date 
`for the scheduling conference for the purpose of: 

`
`(1) preparing an agenda of matters to be discussed at the scheduling conference, 

`(2) preparing a proposed pretrial schedule for the case that includes a plan for 
`discovery, and 
`

`(3) considering whether they will consent to trial by magistrate judge. 
`

`(c) Settlement Proposals. Unless otherwise ordered by the judge, the plaintiff shall 
`present written settlement proposals to all defendants no later than 14 days before the 
`date for the scheduling conference. Defense counsel shall have conferred with their 
`clients on the subject of settlement before the scheduling conference and be prepared to 
`respond to the proposals at the scheduling conference. 

`(d) Joint Statement. Unless otherwise ordered by the judge, the parties are required to 
`file, no later than seven (7) days before the scheduling conference and after 
`consideration of the topics contemplated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) & (c) and 26(f), a joint 
`statement containing a proposed pretrial schedule, which shall include: 

`
`(1) a joint discovery plan scheduling the time and length for all discovery events, 
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 4 of 11
`
`that shall 
`
`
`
`(a) conform to the obligation to limit discovery set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 
`26(b), and 

`(b) take into account the desirability of conducting phased discovery in 
`which the first phase is limited to developing information needed for a 
`realistic assessment of the case and, if the case does not terminate, the 
`second phase is directed at information needed to prepare for trial; and 
`
`(2) a proposed schedule for the filing of motions; and 

`(3) certifications signed by counsel and by an authorized representative of each 
`party affirming that each party and that partyʹs counsel have conferred: 
`
`(a) with a view to establishing a budget for the costs of conducting the full 
`course—and various alternative courses—of the litigation; and 

`(b) to consider the resolution of the litigation through the use of 
`alternative dispute resolution programs such as those outlined in LR 16.4. 
`
` These sections of Local Rule 16.6 provide: 
`

`

`

`
` 2
`

`In addition to the partiesʹ obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (f) and LR 16.1, the parties 
`in cases raising issues of patent infringement shall consider and address in their joint 
`statement under L.R. 16.1 the following issues:  

`
`(1) The timing for disclosing initial infringement and invalidity positions;  

`(2) The process for identifying disputed claim terms, exchanging proposed claim 
`constructions, and claim construction briefing;  

`(3) The timing of and procedure for the claim construction hearing, including:  
`(a) whether the Court will decide claim construction through live testimony at a 
`hearing or based on the papers and attorney argument; and  
`(b) the timing of claim construction relative to summary judgment, expert 
`discovery, and the close of fact discovery.  

`(4) The need for tutorials on the relevant technology, including:  
`(a) the form and scope of any such tutorials; and  
`-4-
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 5 of 11
`
`
`
`(b) the timing for such tutorials.  

`(5) The identification of dispositive issues that may lead to an early resolution of the 
`litigation.  

`(6) Whether the court should authorize the filing under seal of any documents that 
`contain confidential information.  

`(7) Procedures for, and limits (if any) to be placed on, the preservation and 
`discovery of electronically stored information, including:  
`(a) whether preservation and discovery of electronically stored information 
`should be limited to that located on the parties’ active computer systems or 
`extended to backup systems;  
`(b) the identification of key persons, if any, who should have their electronically 
`stored information produced; 
`(c) whether production of electronically stored information should be limited to 
`discrete time periods; 
`(d) whether costs of producing electronically stored information should be 
`shifted, particularly costs of preserving and producing information stored on 
`backup systems.
`
`
`
`-5-
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 6 of 11
`Case 1:19-cv-11586—IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 6 of 11
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 7 of 11
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`
`Civil Action No. ____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`____________________
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`____________________
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`TALWANI, D.J.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I. Timetable for Discovery and Motion Practice
`
`
`This Scheduling Order is intended to provide a reasonable timetable for discovery and
`motion practice in order to help ensure a fair and just resolution of this matter without undue
`expense or delay.
`
`Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules 16.1(f)
`and 16.6, it is hereby ORDERED that:
`
`1. Preliminary Disclosures.
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`Initial Disclosures. Initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) and
`by this court’s Notice of Scheduling Conference must be completed by
`__________.
`
`Preliminary Infringement Disclosure. No later than __________, the
`patentee shall serve and file preliminary disclosure of the claims infringed.
`The patentee shall specify which claims are allegedly infringed and identify
`the accused product(s) or method(s) that allegedly infringe those claims. The
`patentee shall also specify whether the alleged infringement is literal or falls
`under the doctrine of equivalents. If the patentee has not already done so, the
`patentee shall produce all documents supporting its contentions and/or identify
`any such supporting documents produced by the accused infringer. Such
`disclosures may be amended and supplemented up to 30 days before the date
`of the Markman Hearing. After that time, such disclosures may be amended
`or supplemented only by leave of court, for good cause shown.
`
`
`Preliminary Invalidity and Non-Infringement Disclosures. No later than
`
`__________, the accused infringer shall serve and file Preliminary Invalidity
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 8 of 11
`
`and Non-Infringement Contentions. The accused infringer shall identify prior
`art that anticipates or renders obvious the identified patent claims in question
`and, for each such prior art reference, shall specify whether it anticipates or is
`relevant to the obviousness inquiry. If applicable, the accused infringer shall
`also specify any other grounds for invalidity, such as indefiniteness, best mode,
`enablement, or written description. If the accused infringer has not already
`done so, the accused infringer shall produce documents relevant to the
`invalidity defenses and/or identify any such supporting documents produced
`by the patentee. Further, if the accused infringer has not already done so, the
`accused infringer shall produce documents sufficient to show operation of the
`accused product(s) or method(s) that the patentee identified in its preliminary
`infringement disclosures. Such disclosures may be amended and supplemented
`up to 30 days before the date of the Markman Hearing. After that time, such
`disclosures may be amended or supplemented only by leave of court, for good
`cause shown, except that, if the patentee amends or supplements its
`preliminary infringement disclosures, the accused infringer may likewise
`amend or supplement its disclosures within 30 days of service of the amended
`or supplemented infringement disclosures.
`
`2. Amendments to Pleadings. Except for good cause shown, no motions seeking leave
`to add new parties or to amend the pleadings to assert new claims or defenses may be
`filed after __________.
`
`3. Claim Construction Proceedings.
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`No later than __________, the parties shall simultaneously exchange a proposed
`list of claim terms to be construed.
`
`No later than __________, the parties shall simultaneously exchange and file
`preliminary claim construction briefs. Each brief shall contain a list of terms
`construed, the party’s proposed construction of each term, and evidence and
`argument supporting each construction. Absent leave of court, preliminary
`claim construction briefs shall be limited to 25 pages.
`
`No later than __________, parties shall simultaneously exchange reply briefs.
`Absent leave of court, reply briefs shall be limited to 15 pages.
`
`No later than __________, the parties shall finalize the list of disputed terms for
`the court to construe. The parties shall prepare and file a joint claim construction
`and prehearing statement (hereafter the “joint statement”) that identifies both
`agreed and disputed terms.
`
`i. The joint statement shall note the anticipated length of time necessary for
`the claim construction hearing and whether any party proposes to call
`witnesses, including a statement that such extrinsic evidence does not
`conflict with intrinsic evidence.
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 9 of 11
`
`
`ii. The joint statement shall also indicate whether the parties will present
`tutorials on the relevant technology, the form of such tutorials, and the
`timing for such tutorials in relation to the claim construction hearing. If
`the parties plan to provide tutorials in the form of briefs, declarations,
`computer animations, slide presentations, or other media, the parties shall
`exchange such materials seven days before the claim construction
`hearing. In the alternative, the parties may present tutorials through
`presentations by the attorneys or experts at the claim construction
`hearing.
`
`iii. The joint statement shall include a proposed order in which parties will
`present their arguments at the claim construction hearing, which may be
`term-by-term or party-by-party, depending on the issues in the case.
`
`iv. The joint statement shall limit the number of claim terms to be construed
`and shall prioritize the disputed terms in order of importance. The Court
`suggests that, ordinarily, no more than 10 terms per patent be identified
`as requiring construction.
`
`v. The joint statement shall include a joint claim construction chart, noting
`each party’s proposed construction of each term, and supporting
`evidence.
`
`4. The Claim Construction Hearing (a.k.a. “Markman” Hearing). The claim
`construction hearing will be held on __________ at __________.
`
`5. Fact Discovery.
`
`Written Discovery. Written discovery (requests for production of documents,
`interrogatories, and requests for admission) shall be served by __________.
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`Fact Discovery. Fact discovery must be completed by __________.
`
`6. Status Conference. A status conference will be held on __________ at __________.
`
`7. Expert Discovery.
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`Plaintiff(s)’ trial experts must be designated, and the information contemplated by
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) must be disclosed, by __________.
`
`Plaintiff(s)’ trial experts must be deposed by __________.
`
`Defendant(s)’ trial experts must be designated, and the information contemplated
`by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) must be disclosed, by __________.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 10 of 11
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`Defendant(s)’ trial experts must be deposed by __________.
`
`Expert discovery must be completed by __________.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8. Dispositive Motions. Dispositive motions, such as motions for summary judgment or
`partial summary judgment and motions for judgment on the pleadings, must be filed by
`__________.
`
`
`9. Initial Pretrial Conference. An initial pretrial conference will be held on __________ at
`__________. The parties shall prepare and submit a pretrial memorandum in accordance
`with Local Rule 16.5(d) five business days prior to the date of the conference.
`
`Procedural Provisions
`
`1. Extension of Deadlines. Motions to extend or modify deadlines will be granted only
`for good cause shown. All motions to extend shall contain a brief statement of the
`reasons for the request; a summary of the discovery, if any, that remains to be taken;
`and a specific date when the requesting party expects to complete the additional
`discovery, join other parties, amend the pleadings, or file a motion.
`
`2. Motions to Compel or Prevent Discovery. Except for good cause shown, motions to
`compel discovery, motions for protective orders, motions to quash, motions to strike
`discovery responses, and similar motions must be filed no later than seven days after
`the close of fact discovery or the close of expert discovery, whichever deadline is
`relevant. If additional discovery is compelled by the court after the relevant deadline
`has passed, the court may enter such additional orders relating to discovery as may be
`appropriate.
`
`3. Status Conferences. The court has scheduled a status conference after (or close to) the
`close of fact discovery for case management purposes. Any party who reasonably
`believes that a status conference will assist in the management or resolution of the case
`may request one from the court upon reasonable notice to opposing counsel.
`
`4. Additional Conferences. Upon request of counsel, or at the court’s own initiative,
`additional case-management or status conferences may be scheduled.
`
`5. Early Resolution of Issues. The court recognizes that, in some cases, resolution of one
`or more preliminary issues may remove a significant impediment to settlement or
`otherwise expedite resolution of the case. Counsel are encouraged to confer and jointly
`advise the court of any such issues.
`
`6. Pretrial Conference. Lead trial counsel are required to attend any pretrial conference.
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 8 Filed 09/17/19 Page 11 of 11
`
`
`7. Discovery Disputes. In the event the parties encounter a discovery dispute, they are
`encouraged to request a hearing or telephone conference with the court before filing a
`discovery motion.
`
`8. Proposed Orders: Any proposed orders, such as Proposed Protective Orders, shall be
`docketed separately as an exhibit to a Motion for Proposed Order.
`
`
`Date:
`
` EXAMPLE
`United States District Judge
`
`By: EXAMPLE
`Courtroom Deputy Clerk
`
`
`
`
`

`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket