throbber

`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 422-1 Filed 09/28/23 Page 2 of 4Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 424 Filed 10/02/23 Page 1 of 3
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC,
`
`v.
`
`FITBIT LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11586-FDS
`
`
`
`
`PHILIPS’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS PERTAINING
`TO U.S. PAT. NO. 7,088,233 AND TO ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT ON
`U.S. PAT. NOS. 8,277,377 AND 6,013,007
`
`Fitbit’s Opposition to Philips’ Motion for Final Judgment does not dispute that all claims
`
`have been resolved and that this Court should “enter a final judgment that disposes of all claims
`
`and counterclaims.” Dkt. 420 at 1 (emphasis suppled). Fitbit’s Opposition is premised solely on a
`
`mistaken assertion that this Court no longer has jurisdiction. However, Philips only filed its Motion
`
`for Final Judgment after Fitbit claimed in its Docketing Statement that the Federal Circuit lacks
`
`jurisdiction. See Ex. 1 at 1 (Dkt. 419-1) (“[T]his appeal should be dismissed because the Federal
`
`Circuit lacks jurisdiction.”). Thus, under Fitbit own view of the case, this Court, not the Federal
`
`Circuit, has jurisdiction and can enter Final Judgment.
`
`Fitbit’s contention in the Federal Circuit is the reason this motion was filed to clarify the
`
`record and put an end to Fitbit’s erroneous argument. Indeed, while Fitbit’s Opposition cites to
`
`Griggs, the Supreme Court in that case confirmed that even if a notice of appeal is filed
`
`prematurely (as Fitbit has erroneously alleged has occurred here1) then the notice is considered a
`
`
`1 Philips maintains that its original Notice of Appeal was timely as all issues had been disposed of. See Dkt. 418 at
`2-3. However, in an effort to moot Fitbit’s unfounded jurisdictional concerns, Philips filed its Motion for Final
`Judgment and plans to file as necessary an additional Notice of Appeal following an entry of Final Judgment “in
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 422-1 Filed 09/28/23 Page 3 of 4Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 424 Filed 10/02/23 Page 2 of 3
`
`“nullity” and the lower court retains jurisdiction. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459
`
`U.S. 56, 61 (1982). Further, in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(2), the
`
`Federal Circuit has routinely maintained appeals where lower Courts entered final judgment after
`
`an allegedly premature Notice of Appeal was filed. See, e.g., PODS, Inc. v. Porta Stor, Inc., 484
`
`F.3d 1359, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2007); ABC Corp. I v. P’ship & Unincorporated Ass’ns Identified on
`
`Schedule “A”, 52 F.4th 934, 940 n.6 (Fed. Cir. 2022); Peralta v. Cal. Franchise Tax Bd., 673
`
`Fed.Appx. 975, 977 (Fed. Cir. 2016); J.G. Peta, Inc. v. Club Protector, Inc., 65 Fed.Appx. 724,
`
`725 (Fed. Cir. 2003); see also Pause Tech. LLC v. TiVo Inc., 401 F.3d 1290, 1295 (Fed. Cir. 2005)
`
`(granting Appellant leave to seek remedial action with the District Court to obtain final judgment).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Eley O. Thompson
`
`Eley O. Thompson (pro hac vice)
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`321 N. Clark Street
`Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60654-5313
`Phone: (312) 832-4359
`Fax: (312) 832-4700
`ethompson@foley.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Philips North America LLC
`
`
`
` Dated: September 28, 2023
`
`
`
`
`Ruben J. Rodrigues (BBO 676,573)
`Lucas I. Silva (BBO 673,935)
`John Custer (BBO 705,258)
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`111 Huntington Avenue
`Suite 2500
`Boston, MA 02199-7610
`Phone: (617) 342-4000
`Fax: (617) 342-4001
`lsilva@foley.com
`rrodrigues@foley.com
`jcuster@foley.com
`
`
`
`
`order to avoid any doubts over [appellate] jurisdiction.” Clausen v. Sea-3 Inc., 21 F.3d 1181, 1183-84 (1st Cir.
`1994).
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 422-1 Filed 09/28/23 Page 4 of 4Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 424 Filed 10/02/23 Page 3 of 3
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was filed with
`
`the Court through the ECF system and that a copy will be electronically served on registered
`
`participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ John W. Custer
` John W. Custer
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket