throbber

`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 37 Filed 01/14/20 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC,
`
`v.
`
`FITBIT, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11586-IT
`
`DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
`ITS RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`COMES NOW Defendant Fitbit, Inc. (“Fitbit” or “Defendant”) pursuant to Local Rule
`
`7.1(b)(3), and respectfully request that the Court grant Defendant leave to file the attached
`
`proposed page reply brief in support of its Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the Amended
`
`Complaint (attached hereto as Exhibit A).
`
`In support hereof, Fitbit states that Plaintiff’s responsive filings contained in ECF 36
`
`contain new issues, arguments, and factual assertions which require response by Fitbit herein. In
`
`particular, the proposed reply brief, attached, addresses, among other issues:
`
`(i) the opposition’s mischaracterization of the applicable legal standards relevant
`
`to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss;
`
`(ii) the opposition’s almost exclusive reliance on conclusory allegations in the
`
`amended complaint, to the exclusion of the text of the patent claims or specifications;
`
`(iii) the opposition’s almost exclusive reliance on allegations in the amended
`
`complaint that contradict the clear language of the patent claims and admission made in
`
`the specifications;
`
`(iv) why cases cited by Plaintiff are readily distinguishable; and
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 37 Filed 01/14/20 Page 2 of 4
`
`(v) misstatements in the opposition concerning facts alleged in the amended
`
`complaint.
`
`A reply is appropriate to address the factual and legal arguments raised in Plaintiff’s
`
`opposition brief, and will materially assist the Court in addressing the issues raised in the Motion
`
`to Dismiss. See Sunrise Techs., Inc. v. SELC Ir., Ltd., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83978 at *24 (D.
`
`Mass. Jun. 14, 2016); Napert v. Gov’t Employees Ins. Co., 2013 WL 3989645, at *2 n.4 (D.
`
`Mass. Aug. 1, 2013).
`
`The Court has not yet scheduled a date to hear the parties’ oral argument in Defendant’s
`
`Motion to Dismiss and any such date need not be impacted by the allowance of this motion. No
`
`party will be prejudiced by the relief requested.
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`In accordance with Local Rule 7.l (d), Defendant respectfully requests oral argument on
`
`this motion, as it believes that oral argument may assist the Court in its consideration of the
`
`merits hereof.
`
`LOCAL RULE 7.1(a)(2) CERTIFICATE
`
`The undersigned counsel certify that they have conferred with counsel for the Plaintiff
`
`who informed the undersigned that the Plaintiff Philips North America LLC did not consent to
`
`the relief requested in this motion.
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 37 Filed 01/14/20 Page 3 of 4
`
`Dated: January 14, 2020
`
`FITBIT, INC.
`
`By Its Attorneys,
`
`/s/ Yar R. Chaikovsky
`Yar R. Chaikovsky
`yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com
`Dave Beckwith
`davidbeckwith@paulhastings.com
`David Okano
`davidokano@paulhastings.com
`Radhesh Devendran
`radheshdevendran@paulhastings.com
`Berkeley Fife
`berkeleyfife@paulhastings.com
`
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`1117 S. California Avenue
`Palo Alto, California 94304-1106
`Telephone:
`(650) 320-1800
`Facsimile:
`(650) 320-1900
`
`Jennifer B. Furey (BBO # 634174)
`Andrew T. O’Connor (BBO # 664811)
`GOULSTON & STORRS PC
`400 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02110
`Telephone: (617) 482-1776
`Facsimile: (617) 574-4112
`E-mail jfurey@goulstonstorrs.com
`
`aoconnor@goulstonstorrs.com
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 37 Filed 01/14/20 Page 4 of 4
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that a true copy of the above document was served on the attorney of record for
`
`each party via the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send notification of this filing (NEF) to
`
`all registered participants, and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as nonregistered
`
`participants.
`
`
`Dated: January 14, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Yar R. Chaikovsky
`
`
`Yar R. Chaikovsky (Pro Hac Vice)
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket