throbber
Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 210-5 Filed 07/16/21 Page 1 of 3
`Case 1:19-cv-11586—FDS Document 210-5 Filed 07/16/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`EXHIBIT 2.A
`
`EXHIBIT 2.A
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 210-5 Filed 07/16/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`Prof. Dr. Willem Hoyng
`Counsel
`Office: Amsterdam
`T +31 (0)20 592 4415
`Willem.hoyng@hoyngrokh.com
`
`
`Willem’s practice primarily consists of litigating in the field of intellectual property law. Willem
`acts before all the national courts (the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the
`Supreme Court). He also regularly litigates before the Court of Justice of the European
`Union (CJEU) and the European Patent Office (EPO). Willem is also involved in advising on
`European patent strategies and coordinating and conducting European patent proceedings.
`He is the adviser of many innovative Dutch and foreign multinationals, including
`pharmaceutical and biotechnological companies.
`
`Willem is a professor of Intellectual Property Law at the University of Tilburg since 1988.
`
`Willem is one of the founding members of HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER, he was the
`managing partner of HOYNG MONEGIER from 2011 until 2015, when the firm merged with
`the German IP boutique ROKH IP and stepped down as managing partner of HOYNG
`ROKH MONEGIER in January 2018.
`
`Willem is a member of a select group of lawyers admitted to appear before the Dutch
`Supreme Court.
`
`He is a member of the drafting committee of the Rules of Proceedings of the future Unified
`Patent Court (UPC) and member of the Advisory Committee of the UPC Preparatory
`Committee. He advises also the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs on UPC matters.
`
`He was in 1985 the originator of pan-European injunctions and advocated the possibility of
`such injunctions successfully in the European Court of Justice.
`
`
`REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS
`
`
` Monsanto vs Cefetra. Represented Monsanto in the first patent case (interpretation
`of the Biotech Directive) in the European Court of Justice.
` Dijkstra v. Saier. Represented Dijkstra before the Dutch Supreme Court, which
`accepted the doctrine of file wrapper estoppel in Dutch patent law. Convinced the
`Supreme Court to revoke the decision of the Court of Appeal.
` Van Bentum v. Kool. Represented Van Bentum before the Dutch Supreme Court,
`convincing the court that foreseeable equivalents which the patentee did not claim
`can still be claimed under the doctrine of equivalents.
` Mega Brands v. Lego. Convinced the Court of Appeal of Den Bosch that, contrary to
`the earlier decisions of the Court of Appeal of Amsterdam the sale of copies of Lego
`bricks by Mega Brands should not be prevented under the doctrine of slavish
`imitation and thereafter convinced the Supreme Court to dismiss lego’s appeal.
` Solvay v Honeywell. Argued that Dutch courts can grant cross border injunctions in
`preliminary injunction proceedings. The ECJ agreed.
` ASML v Nikon. Coordinated worldwide litigation for ASML v Nikon. Case settled after
`ASML won all first four cases of the 12 cases filed by Nikon in the Netherlands.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 210-5 Filed 07/16/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
` European Patent Lawyers Association (EPLAW), Co-founder and Former President
`International Associations for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI), Former
`
`President of Dutch Group
`IP Advisory Committee of the Dutch Bar, former Chairman
`
` Former member of the Government Advisory Committee on patents
` Former member of the Supervisory Board of the Academy of the European Patent
`Organisation
` Co-founder and former Chairman of the VIEPA, the association of Dutch attorneys
`specialized in IP litigation
` Former member of the government appointed Examination Board for the Dutch
`patent attorney exam
` Former co-chairman of the patent law education program for Dutch patent attorneys
` Former member of the Drafting Committee of the Rules of Procedure of the Unified
`Patent Court
` Member of the committee advising the Preparatory Committee for the Unified Patent
`Court
`
`
`
`LANGUAGES
` Dutch
` English
` French
` German
`
`
`
`
`EDUCATION
` University of Tilburg Ph.D., 1988
` King's College, English Law, 1976
` Admitted to the Bar, 1973
` Leiden University, LLM 1973
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket