`Case 1:19-cv-11586—FDS Document 210-29 Filed 07/16/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`EXHIBIT 2.Y
`
`EXHIBIT 2.Y
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 210-29 Filed 07/16/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`T&C lP, commentary on Section 82 of the Dutch Patents Act 1995
`Position of patent attorney at a hearing
`
`Dack, current through June 8,2021
`
`Current through
`June 8, 202í
`Period
`March 1,2017 through: -
`Author
`Dack
`Source
`T&C lP, commentary on Section 82 of the Dutch Patents Act 1995
`Area(s)of law
`Unknown (V)
`lntellectual property law / Patent law
`Search term(s)
`attorney
`Statutory reference
`Dutch Patents Act 1995, Section 82
`
`Significance
`
`The patent attorney has historically played an important part in infringement and invalidation proceedings. He
`provides the court with a written explanation of the technical aspects of the dispute, on behalf of either the patentee
`or the infringing party. To formalize the fact that a patent attorney may also appear at a hearing, Section 82 specifies
`that a court of law may examine him in disputes referred to in Section 80. This does not mean that the patent
`attorney is given any authority to represent a party on a procedural basis. The attorney retains his responsibility as
`dominus litis.
`
`ian Bruà
`
`';.
`
`-/,\'{Ë<<\;Yl-
`
`c
`
`tslator
`
`Link: htto://deeolinkino kluwer
`A I I ri sïïfindqdiFE-eOFyï$fi t-t n
`lrc-ensees and are.expressly re
`information about thd servióes
`
`TR-N
`
`Nederland B.V. or its
`),12021. For further
`
`Page 111
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 210-29 Filed 07/16/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`l, Tamara Theresia Natasja van Bruggen, residing in Amsterdam, duly sworn as a translator for the
`English language by the District Court of Amsterdam and listed under number 4946in the Dutch
`Register of Sworn lnterpreters and Translators (Regrste r beëdigde tolken en vertolers) of the Dutch
`Legal Aid Board (Road voor Rechtsbijstandl, the official register of sworn interpreters and translators
`recognised and approved by the Dutch Ministry of Justice, certify that the foregoing document is a
`true and faithful translation of the Dutch source text, a copy of which is hereby attached.
`
`Amsterdam ,1.6 July 2O21.
`
`Brueeer-
`
`f,an
`
`Gn statoj
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 210-29 Filed 07/16/21 Page 4 of 4
`T&C IE, commentaar op art. 82 ROW 1995
`Positie octrooigemachtigde ter zitting
`
`Dack, actueel t/m 08-06-2021
`
`Actueel t/m
`08-06-2021
`Tijdvak
`01-03-2017 tot: -
`Auteur
`Dack
`Vindplaats
`T&C IE, commentaar op art. 82 ROW 1995
`Vakgebied(en)
`Onbekend (V)
`Intellectuele-eigendomsrecht / Octrooirecht
`Trefwoord(en)
`gemachtigde
`Wetingang
`Rijksoctrooiwet 1995 artikel 82
`
`Betekenis
`
`In inbreuk- en nietigheidsprocedures speelt de octrooigemachtigde van oudsher een belangrijke rol. Hij geeft vaak namens
`de octrooihouder of inbreukmaker aan de rechter een schriftelijke toelichting van de technische aspecten van het geschil.
`Om te formaliseren dat de octrooigemachtigde ook ter zitting kan optreden, is in art. 82 bepaald dat hij bij de behandeling
`van in art. 80 bedoelde geschillen het woord mag voeren. Dit betekent niet dat aan de octrooigemachtigde
`procesvertegenwoordigingsbevoegdheid is gegeven. De advocaat houdt zijn verantwoordelijkheid als dominus litis.
`
`Link: http://deeplinking.kluwer.nl/?param=00D5705B&cpid=WKNL-LTR-Nav2
`Alle (auteurs-)rechten op dit document berusten bij Wolters Kluwer Nederland B.V. of haar licentiegevers en worden uitdrukkelijk
`voorbehouden. Dit document is gegenereerd op 09-07-2021. Kijk voor meer informatie over de diensten van Wolters Kluwer op www.w
`olterskluwer.nl
`
`Pagina 1/1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
