`
`Exhibit S
`
`
`
`6/18/2021
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-19 Filed 06/18/21 Page 2 of 4
`Case 1:19-CV-11586-FB&.nIDmumat QQQPAthts Efleebflfiiwmdonlibage 2 of 4
`
`10verheid nl
`
`law court
`
`State Patent Act 1995
`
`Valid from 01-04-2020 to today
`Article 23b
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Only persons who are registered as patent attorneys in the register referred to in Article 23a , persons who are registered
`as lawyers at a court pursuant to Article 1 of the Advocatenwet and persons who, pursuant to Article 1 of the Lawyers
`National Ordinance or Article 1 of the BES Lawyers Act are registered as lawyers with the Joint Court of Justice of Aruba,
`Curacao and Sint Maarten and of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba.
`The director of the bureau may require a lawyer to inspect the endorsed deed of his swearing in as a lawyer before
`admitting him to the bureau as an authorized representative.
`In special cases, the director of the bureau may also authorize persons other than the persons referred to in paragraph 1 to
`act as authorized representatives for the bureau, if they do not make such action their profession or if they work in a
`Member State of the European Union or in another State party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area are
`authorized to act as agent in patent matters and they act as agent for the Office only in incidental cases.
`Unless provided otherwise by or pursuant to law, a patent attorney or a person who works under his responsibility is obliged
`to observe secrecy with regard to all information of which he becomes aware by virtue of his activities as such. This
`obligation continues after termination of the relevant work.
`
`httpszllwetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0007118/2020-04-01/0/Hoofdstuk2/Paragraaf1alArtikel23b/afdrukken
`
`1/1
`
`
`
`6/18/2021
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-19 Filed 06/18/21 Page 3 of 4
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FB&.nIDmumatQQQPAthtsEfleebflfia’wsvéfidmfleage 3 of 4
`
`10verheid nl
`
`law court
`
`State Patent Act 1995
`
`Valid from 01-04-2020 to today
`Article 80
`
`1
`
`In the first instance, the District Court of The Hague is exclusively competent for:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`c.
`d.
`
`a.
`b.
`
`2
`
`claims for lack of legal effect, nullification, determination of loss of legal effect or claim of patents, referred to in Articles 10
`, E , fl and 78 respectively ;
`claims for European patent applications;
`claims for the granting of a license as referred to in Article 58,flpajg@m ;
`claims for compensation as referred to in Articles 58 , fl and Q .
`The District Court of The Hague and the preliminary reliefjudge of that district court have exclusive jurisdiction in the
`Netherlands in the first instance for:
`
`claims, as referred to in Articles 70 , fl , Q and 7_3 ;
`claims brought by a person other than the patent holder in order to establish that certain acts performed by him are not in
`conflict with a patent.
`
`httpszllwetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0007118/2020-04-01/0/Hoofdstuk6/Artikel80/afdru kken
`
`1/ 1
`
`
`
`6/18/2021
`
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-19 Filed 06/18/21 Page 4 of 4
`Case 1:19-CV-11586-FB&.nIDmumstt QQQPAthts Efleebflfiiwsvéfidonlibage 4 of 4
`
`Qverheid nl
`
`law court
`
`State Patent Act 1995
`
`Valid from 01-04-2020 to today
`Article 82
`
`Patent attorneys may speak during the hearing of disputes referred to in Article 80 , without prejudice to the lawyer's responsibility.
`
`httpszllwetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0007118/2020-04-01/0/Hoofdstuk6/Artikel82/afdru kken
`
`1/ 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
