Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 1 of 6
`Case 1:19-cv-11586—FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 1 of 6
`
`EXHIBIT N
`
`EXHIBIT N
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 2 of 6
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 2 of 6
`
`Dutch Law Reports 1989, 563
`
`District Court of Zutphen, OSIOIIIQSB
`
`District Court onutphen, 05/01f1988, ECLi:NL:RBZUT:1988:A88996
`
`Court
`
`District Court of Zutphen
`Date
`
`5 January 1988
`Justices
`
`Van Rookhuijsen
`Case number
`
`{1983-01-05/Ni_64152]
`National Case-Law Number {UNI
`A38996
`
`Juriconnect Doctrine Identifier {JCDIJ
`JCDI:ADSl44769:1
`
`Fieldis) of law
`Unknown iv}
`intellectual property law/ General
`Law of civil procedure (V)
`Source documents
`
`ECLi:NL:RBZUT:1988:A88996, Judgement, District Court of Zutphen, 05/01/1988
`Applicable legal provision
`
`Section 191 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure {old}
`
`Essence
`
`Can a patent attorney request to be excused from giving evidence as a witness? In this case, no.
`
`Summary
`
`The patent attorney/witness cannot derive a la layer-client privilege from Article 8 of the Patent Attorney Regulations
`{Octraolgemachtigen-Reglement)1936, Bulletin ofActs and Decrees 642, as the case at issue iwhich deals with the question
`whether a licence agreement was concluded between the parties} does not relate to knowledge obtained in their Specific
`capacity as patent attorney.
`Nor can the patent attorney/witness derive a iawyenclient privilege from the Rules of Conduct for patent attorneys. if the
`patent attorney operates outside the scope of their specific duties — rendering assistance in patent applications ~— it can
`definitely not be upheld that the performance of their duties with regard to ancillary activities, such as the ones at issue here,
`involves a public interest to the efiect that they are entitled to confidentiality - also uis-a—vis the court , which outweighs the
`compelling interest offact—finding in court.
`
`Pa rtv or Parties:
`
`DJ. Bruil, in Doetinchem, the Netherlands, applicant, local counsel F.HJ.G. Jurrius LLM, lawyerJ.R. Dam LLM in Doetinchem,
`versus
`
`Tital international BV, in Haaksbergen, the Netherlands, defendant, failed to appear.
`
`Judgement
`
`DJ. Broil, in Doetinchem, the Netherlands, applicant, local counsel F.H.J.G. Jurrius LLM, lawyerJ.R. Dam LLM in Doetinchem,
`versus:
`
`Tital International 8V, in Haaksbergen, the Netheriands, defendant, failed to appear.
`
`
`__
`__%m
`Lin k: http:f{deeplinl<ing.kluwer. nl/?param=00190960&cpid=WKNL—LTR-Navz
`Page 1/2
`All rights and copyrights on this document are vested in Wolters Kluwer Nederiand 8M or its licensors and are explicitly reserved. This
`document was generated on 04/06! 2021. For more information about the services of Wolters Kluwer, go to www.woltersi<iuwer.n|
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 3 of 6
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 3 of 6
`
`Link: http://deep|inking.kluwer.nI/?param=00IBDSSUBicprdzme-LTR-Navz
`AH rights and copyrights on this document are vested in Walters Kiuwer Nederland BM. or its “censors and are expliciiiy reserved. This
`document was generated on 04/06f2021. For more information about the services of Waiters Kluwer, go to wwwwolterskluwernl
`
`Page 2/2
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 4 of 6
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 4 of 6
`
`8 June 2021
`
`l‘ D. Malestein, sworn translator forthe Engiish and Dutch languages, sworn in at the
`
`District Court of Utrecht, the Netherlands, do solemnly and sincerely declare that the
`
`Dutch document attached is the original document submitted to me for translation
`
`and that the English document attached is a full, true and faithful translation ofthis
`
`Dutch document made by me,
`
`
`
`D. Huigen-Malestein
`
`Wbtxir1 number: 2427
`
`Willemarsiaan 12
`
`3772 NN Barneveld
`
`The Netherlands
`
`
`
`! Abbreviation for Sworn interpreters and Translators Act
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 5 of 6
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 5 of 6
`
`NJ 1989. 563
`
`Rb. Zutphen, 05-01-1933
`
`Rb. Zuiphen 05-014 988, ECleNLzRBZUT:1988:A83996
`
`
`
`Essentie
`
`Kan octrooigemadatigde zioh ais getuige verschonen? l.c. nean.
`
`Samenvatting
`
`Aan art. 8 Octroofgemachh‘gsn-Reglement 1936, srb. 642, Ran de octroolgemachuyde/getuige geen recht van verschoning
`onn‘enen, aangezien her he. (waag ofer a! den niet russen partijen een licenfleovereenkomsl for stand is gekomsn) niet gear
`om werenschap verkregen in szn spect'fieke hoedanfgheid van ocrromyemachrigde‘
`De octrooxyemachtryde/getuige kan evenmfn een ream (or verschonfng antlenan aan de GedragsregeJFS voor de
`octroor’gemachtigden. Dear wear de ocmofgemachtigde (reed! buffer: de krr'ng van zijn specifieke werkzaamheden __ he!
`verlenen van bflsfand bij de octrooiaanwage ..... kan zeker niet warden gezegd dai met de uftoefening van 2:]?! (ask ten
`aanzr‘en van nevenwerkzaamheden ais de onderhavfge sen zodanig maatschappefik befang def gehefmhoudfng ——— oak
`tegenover de rechter —- meebrengt, is gemoefd, dat daawoor moei wér'ken he! zwaamegend belang dat in rechfe de
`waarheid aan be! rich: komt.
`
`Partij(en)
`
`D.J. Bruil. 1e Doetincham, velzoeker. proc. Mr. F.H.J.G. Jurrius. adv. Mr. JR. Dam te Doetinchem,
`legen
`
`Tilal International BV. te Haaksbergan. vemeerster. niet vemchenen.
`
`
`
`Uitspraak
`
`DAJ. Bruil. te Doetinchem, verzoeker, pron. Mr. F.H.J.G. Jurn’us. adv. Mr. JR. Dam te Doetinchem,
`tegen:
`Tital lntemalionai BV, te Haaksbergen. verweerster, niel verschenen.
`
`Link: htthMeepilnmng.kluwer'.nff7param=00‘l9D§60&cpid=WKF\|L7LTR7NaVZ
`Aile (auteurerecntel‘: op dit document bewsteu bi} \I'VOHCI‘J Kluwer Nerferlafld BM. 05 fiaar liceniiegevers en warden Ultdlukkelijk
`vootbehouden. Di1 document is gegenereerd op 04-06-2021 Kijk v00! mee: Erfiormatie Duel c‘e diensien van Walters Khmer op mwmw
`olterskluweml
`
`Page 1r”?
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 6 of 6
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-14 Filed 06/18/21 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`Link: ht1p.x'r’cfeeplénking,kluwer.nif?pararn=00‘:ED960<§cpi<i=WKNLALTRiNav2
`Aile [auteur's-ll’echlen op cm comment berusien bii Welteas Kim-ver Nederiand BM. of hear Ficemjegevers en wulden uitdrukkelifk
`voorbehmden. DA document Is gegenereer-fl on 0406-2021. Kijk vow mee.r informatie over [IE-l (fiensten van Wolzers Kiuwer op wwww
`olierskiuwer_:-1I
`
`Page 2J2
`
`