throbber
Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 1 of 18
`
`Exhibit L
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 2 of 18
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`FITBIT, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`C.A. No.: 1:19-cv-11585-IT
`
`PLAINTIFF PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC’S
`
`SUPPLEMENT OF MAY 28th, 2021 TO CONFIDENTIAL PRIVILEGE LOG
`
`Plaintiff Philips North America LLC (“Philips”), by and through its attorneys, hereby
`
`provide the attached supplemental to the confidential privilege log for the emails of Arie Tol,
`
`attached as Exhibit A, and further prepared in accordance with the Stipulation on Discovery of
`
`April 2, 2020 (Dkt. No. 59-01). This supplement is provided in response to requests by defendant
`
`Fitbit, Inc. as related to entries Nos. 5, 13-17, 42-47, 70, 80, 144, 148-149, 155-156, 176, 179-
`
`180, 216-217, 255, 299-301, 408-431, 433, 437-438, 440-444, 446, and 450-464. Philips
`
`designates the contents of this supplemental privilege log as CONFIDENTIAL pursuant to the
`
`protective order.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 3 of 18
`
`Dated: May 28, 2021
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ruben Rodrigues
`
`Lucas I. Silva (BBO 673,935)
`Ruben J. Rodrigues (BBO 676,573)
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`111 Huntington Avenue
`Suite 2500
`Boston, MA 02199-7610
`Phone: (617) 342-4000
`Fax: (671) 342-4001
`lsilva@foley.com
`
`Eley O. Thompson (pro hac vice to be filed)
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`321 N. Clark Street
`Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60654-5313
`Phone: (312) 832-4359
`Fax: (312) 832-4700
`ethompson@foley.com
`
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`Philips North America LLC
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 4 of 18
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above document was
`
`served on May 28, 2021 on counsel for Defendant via electronic mail.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ruben J. Rodrigues
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 5 of 18
`Case 1:19-cv-11586—FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 5 of 18
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 6 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) - May 28, 2021 Supplement to Privilege Log re A. T01 E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`No. Date
`
`FROM
`TO
`CC
`
`Privilege
`Previous Privilege Description
`Additional Description
`
`
`
`42
`
`' 5/18/2016
`
`Erik Pastink
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AC
`
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice concerning potential
`
`amendments to patent purchase
`
`
`
`
`Reflects legal advice of Dutch
`Patent Attorney Erik Pastink
`with regards to Quy patents and
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 7 of 18
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 7 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) — May 28, 202] Supplement to Privilege Log re A. To] E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`No. Date
`
`FROM
`
`43
`
`5/20/2016
`
`Arie Tol
`
`
`
`David
`Schreiber
`
`
`
`_
`I -
`
`Privilege
`
`Previous Privilege Description
`agreement relating to Quy
`patents.
`
`Additional Description
`amendment to patent puchase
`agreement.
`
`
`
`
`Reflects legal advice of Dutch
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`Patent Attorney Erik Pastink
`advice concerning potential
`
`amendments to patent purchase with regards to Quy patents and
`
`agreement relating to Quy
`amendment to patent puchase
`
`patents.
`agreement.
`
`-
`
`I
`
`46
`
`47
`
`l
`.w-IAC'adviceconcerningpotential
`
`
`6/8/2016
`
`Arie Tol
`
`6/10/2016
`
`Erik Pastink
`
`Arie Tol
`
`AC
`
`
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`Reflects legal advice of Dutch
`
`amendments to patent purchase
`
`agreement relating to Quy
`
`patents.
`Reflects legal advice of Dutch
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`Patent Attorney Erik Pastink
`advice concerning potential
`amendments to patent purchase with regards to Quy patent and
`agreement relating to Quy
`amendment to patent puchase
`. atents.
`a ; reement.
`
`PatentAttorneyErikPastink
`
`with regards to Quy patent and
`amendment to patent puchase
`agreement.
`
`
`
`
`
`70
`
`9/30/2016
`
`Jako Eleveld
`
`Arie Tol
`
`Reflects work product relating to
`Correspondence reflecting work
`pre-suit investigation for present
`product relating to pre-suit
`litigation as well as other
`investigation for present
`unrelated ongoing and potential
`litigation as well as other
`litigation matters
`ongoing and potential litigation
`matters.
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 8 of 18
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 8 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) - May 28, 202] Supplcmcnt to Privilege Log re A. To] E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`No. Date
`
`FROM
`
`Privilege
`
`Previous Privilege Description
`
`Additional Description
`
`11/17/2017
`
`Navin
`Natoewal
`
`
`
`AC / WP Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`present litigation with Fitbit and
`potential litigation with others.
`
`Reflect legal advice of Dutch
`Patent Attorney Erik Pastink
`with regards to patent unrelated
`to those asserted in this matter,
`
`
`as well as material protected by
`work product concerning pre-
`
`suit investigation.
`
`
`
`
`iiili§|
` 144
`
`
`
`
`
`Pierre Hendriks Arie Tol
`
`Gabrielle
`Wellens
`
`AC
`
`12/13/2017
`
`Erik Pastink
`
`156
`
`12/13/2017
`
`Pierre Hendriks
`
`'
`Reflects legal advice of Dutch
`
`'
`'
`Patent Attorney Erik Pastink
`with regards to Quy patents and
`
`amendment to patent puchase
`
`
`agreement.
`
`Reflects legal advice of Dutch
`
`Patent Attorney Erik Pastink
`
`with regards to Quy patents and
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 9 of 18
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 9 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) - May 28, 202] Supplement to Privilege Log re A. To] E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`No.
`
`FROM
`
`TO
`
`CC
`
`Privilege
`
`Previous Privilege Description
`
`r esent l-m-gaflenwmd-'
`
`Additional Description
`amendment to patent puchase
`
`_
`
`agreement.
`
`-
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 10 of 18
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 10 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) - May 28, 202] Supplcmcnt to Privilege Log re A. To] E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`No. Date
`
`FROM
`
`TO
`
`CC
`
`Privilege
`
`Previous Privilege Description
`
`Additional Description
`
`299
`
`2/12/2019
`
`Arie Tol;
`Edward Blocker
`
`
`
`
`
`AC/ WP
`
`Reflects the legal advice of U.S.
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating Attorney Ed Blocker with regards
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`to dispute with- and
`potential litigation with
`related work product.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`300
`
`301
`
`2/13/2019
`
`Erik Pastink
`
`Arie Tol;
`Edward Blocker
`
`2/13/2019
`
`Erik Pastink
`
`Brint Yorks
`
`Arie Tol
`
`Reflects work product relating to
`pre-suit investigation for the
`potential litigation with-.
`
`Reflects work product relating to
`Correspondence reflecting work
`pre-suit investigation for the
`product relating to pre-suit
`potential litigation with-.
`investigation for the potential
`
`litigation with-.
`Correspondence reflecting work
`product relating to pre-suit
`investigation for the potential
`liti ation with
`.
`
`408
`
`7/23/2019
`
`Tol, Arie
`
`Jako Eleveld
`
`_-
`
`I
`
`
`Reflects legal advice of U.S.
`Edward Blocker AC / WP Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating Attorney Ed Blocker concerning
`
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`dispute with- and work
`
`potential litigation with-.
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`
`
`
`litigation with
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 11 of 18
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 11 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) — May 28, 2021 Supplcmcnt to Privilege Log re A. To] E—mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
` No.
`Privilege
`Previous Privilege Description
`Additional Description
`investigation for potential
`litigation with Lifescan.
`
`Edward Blocker Arie Tol
`
`
`7/24/2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`advice relating to pre—suit
`
`
`dispute with-
`investigation for the potential
`
`litigation with
`.
`
`
`
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`
`advice and work product relating Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`
`
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`dispute with- and work
`
`potential litigation with- product concerning pre-suit
`
`investigation for potential
`
`litigation with-.
`
` 414
`Reflects legal advice of U5.
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`7/24/2019
`Edward Blocker
`Jako Eleveld
`Arie Tol
`advice and work product relating
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`
`
`dispute with- and work
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`
`
`potential litigation with-
`product concerning pre-suit
`
`
`
`investigation for potential
`litigation with
`.
`
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`AC / WP
`Edward Blocker Arie Tol
`Jako Eleveld
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`advice and work product relating Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`dispute with- and work
`
`potential litigation with-.
`product concerning pre—suit
`
`investigation for potential
`
`
`litigation with
`.
`
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`AC / WP Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`dispute with- and work
`
`potential litigation with- product concerning pre-suit
`
`investigation for potential
`
`litigation with
`
`
`
`
`7/24/2019
`
`Jako Eleveld
`
`Edward Blocker AC / WP
`
`
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`Jako Eleveld
`
`Arie Tol
`
`7/25/2019
`
`7/25/2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 12 of 18
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 12 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) — May 28, 2021 Supplement to Privilege Log re A. To] E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`Date
`
`7/26/2019
`
`TO
`
`Edward Blocker Arie Tol
`
`Privilege
`
`7/26/2019
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`7/26/2019
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`7/28/2019
`
`Edward Blocker Arie Tol
`
`7/29/2019
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`
`
`potential litigation witl-. Reflects legal advice of U.S.
`
`
`Previous Privilege Description
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`potential litigation with-.
`
`Correspondence reflecting work
`product relating to pre-suit
`investigation for the potential
`litigation with-.
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`potential litigation witl-.
`
`Correspondence reflecting work
`product relating to pre-suit
`investigation for the potential
`litigation with-.
`
`Correspondence reflecting work
`product relating to pre—suit
`investigation for the potential
`litigation with
`
`Additional Description
`Reflects legal advice of U.S.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- and work
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`litigation with
`.
`Reflects request for legal advice
`from U.S. Attorney Ed. Blocker
`concerning dispute with-
`and work product concerning
`pre-suit investigation for
`potential litigation with
`Reflects legal advice of U.S.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- and work
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`litigation with-.
`
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- and work
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`litigation with
`Reflects legal advice of U.S.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- and work
`product concerning pre—suit
`investigation for potential
`liti ; ation with
`.
`
`Reflects legal advice of U.S.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- and work
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`litigation with
`
`7/29/2019
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating
`to pre—suit investigation for the
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 13 of 18
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 13 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) — May 28, 2021 Supplement to Privilege Log re A. To] E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`Previous Privilege Description
`Privilege
`& / WP Correspondence reflecting work
`product relating to pre—suit
`investigation for the potential
`litigation with
`
`AC/WP Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`potential litigation with-
`
`Additional Description
`Reflects request for legal advice
`from us. Attorney Ed. Blocker
`concerning dispute with-
`and work product concerning
`pre—suit investigation for
`potential litigation with
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- and work
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`litigation with
`.
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- and work
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`
`litigation with-.
`
`No. Date
`7/29/2019
`
`FROM
`Tol, Arie
`
`CC
`
`TO
`Edward Blocker
`
`
`
`7/29/2019
`
`Edward Blocker Arie Tol
`
`7/30/2019
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`7/31/2019
`
`Edward Blocker Arie Tol
`
`
`
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- and work
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`
`litigation with —
`Reflects request for legal advice
`from us. Attorney Ed. Blocker
`concerning dispute with-
`
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute witl-.
`
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with-.
`
` Reflects legal advice of US.
`
`potential litigation with-
`
`AC / WP Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`potential litigation witi-.
`
`AC / WP Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`
`427
`
`7/31/2019
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`
`
`7/31/2019
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`7/31/2019
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`
`
`AC
`
`AC
`
`AC
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice relating to pre—suit
`investigation for the potential
`litigation with
`.
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice relating to pre-suit
`investigation for the potential
`liti. tion with
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice relating to pre-suit
`investigation for the potential
`litigation with
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 14 of 18
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 14 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) — May 28, 2021 Supplement to Privilege Log re A. To] E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`Date
`
`FROM
`
`TO
`
`CC
`
`No.
`430
`
`8/1/2019
`
`Tol, Arie
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`
`
`Arie Tol
`
`431
`
`8/1/2019
`
`433
`
`8/19/2019
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`10/10/2019
`
`Tol, Arie
`
`Kevin Ecker
`10/10/2019i
`
`438
`
`Arie Tol
`
`440
`
`10/11/2019 -w
`
`AC/WP
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product
`concerning potential litigation
`with
`
`with-.
` 437
`
`Privilege
`AC
`
`Previous Privilege Description
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice relating to pre-suit
`investigation for the potential
`litigation with
`
`AC
`
`AC/WP
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice relating to pre-suit
`investigation for the potential
`litiation with
`.
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`potential litigation with- .
`
`AC/WP
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product
`concerning potential litigation
`with-
`
`AC/WP
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product
`concerning potential litigation
`
`Additional Description
`Reflects request for legal advice
`from US. Attorney Ed. Blocker
`concerning dispute with
`, as well as legal advice
`of US. Attorney Ed Blocker wiht
`regards to same.
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with-
`
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- and work
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`litigation with
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- and work
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`litigation with-; further
`request legal advice from us.
`Attorney Kevin Ecker
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- Reflects
`legal advice of us. Attorney
`Kevin Ecker with regards to
`same; additionally reflects work
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`litigation with
`.
`Reflects legal advice of us.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with-; Reflects
`legal advice of US. Attorney
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 15 of 18
`Case 1:19—cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 15 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) — May 28, 202] Supplement to Privilege Log re A. To] E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`No. Date
`
`
`FROM
`
`TO
`
`CC
`
`Privilege
`
`Previous Privilege Description
`
`
`
`Additional Description
`Kevin Ecker with regards to
`
`same; additionally reflects work
`
`product concerning pre—suit
`
`investigation for potential
`|iti_ation with
`
`441
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`advice and work product
`
`
`concerning potential litigation
`dispute with- Reflects
`Wm.-
`legal advice of U5. Attorney
`
`Kevin Ecker with regards to
`same; additionally reflects work
`
`product concerning pre-suit
`
`
`investigation for potential
`
`
`
`JakoEleveld E!AC/WPCorrespondencereflectinglegal
`
`
`443
`
`
`10/14/2019
`
`10/11/2019
`
`Tol, Arie
`
`Jako Eleveld
`
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- Reflects
`legal advice of US. Attorney
`Kevin Ecker with regards to
`same; additionally reflects work
`
`product concerning pre-suit
`
`investigation for potential
`
`litigation wit
`
`AC / WP Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product
`concerning potential litigation
`with--
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 16 of 18
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 16 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) - May 28, 202] Supplcmcnt to Privilege Log re A. To] E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`No. Date
`
`FROM
`
`TO
`
`CC
`
`Privilege
`
`Previous Privilege Description
`
`Additional Description
`
`
`iil: il
`_
`
`
`Correspondence reflecting work
`product relating to pre-suit
`investigation for the potential
`litigation with-
`
`
`
`450
`
`12/9/2019
`
`Tol, Arie
`
`451
`
`12/9/2019
`
`Kevin Ecker
`
`I
`I
`I _ _
`I
`
`
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`
`Reflects legal advice of U5.
`
`Attorney Ed. Blocker concerning
`dispute with- Reflects
`
`legal advice of US. Attorney
`
`Kevin Ecker with regards to
`same; additionally reflects work
`product concerning pre-suit
`investigation for potential
`litigation with
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Kevin Ecker with
`regards to same; additionally
`reflects work product
`concerning pre-suit investigation
`for potential litigation with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Correspondence reflecting work
`product relating to pre-suit
`investigation for the potential
`litigation with-
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 17 of 18
`Case 1:19—cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 17 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) - May 28, 202] Supplcmcnt to Privilege Log re A. To] E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`No. Date
`
`FROM
`
`TO
`
`CC
`
`Privilege
`
`Previous Privilege Description
`
`Additional Description
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`458
`
`12/12/2019
`
` Reflects legal advice of U.S.
`
`AC—I—WP Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating
`Attorney Kevin Ecker with
`regards to dispute with-
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`
`potential litigation with
`
`
`
`
`
`12/13/2019 Kevin Ecker
`
`460
`
`
`
`AC—l—WP
`
`
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating
`
`to pre-suit investigation for the
`potential litigation with
`
`Reflects legal advice of U.S.
`Attorney Kevin Ecker with
`regards to dispute with-
`
`
`
`459
`
`12/13/2019
`
`Tol, Arie
`
`Kevin Ecker
`
`A_C WP
`
`
`Reflects request for legal advice
`of U.S. Attorney Kevin Ecker with
`regards to dispute with-
`
`
`
`EKeVinEeker
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 18 of 18
`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-12 Filed 06/18/21 Page 18 of 18
`
`Philips v. Fitbit (D. Mass) — May 28, 2021 Supplement to Privilcgc Log re A. To] E-mails.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`No.
`
`Date
`
`FROM
`
`TO
`
`CC
`
`Privilege
`
`12/17/2019 -w
`12/17/2019w-
`
`AC/WP
`
`regards to dispute with-
`
`Previous Privilege Description
`Correspondence reflecting work
`product relating to pre-suit
`investigation for the potential
`litigation with
`Correspondence reflecting legal
`advice and work product relating
`to pre—suit investigation for the
`totential liti _ation with
`
`Additional Description
`Reflects request for legal advice
`of US. Attorney Kevin Ecker with
`regards to dispute with l.-
`
`Reflects legal advice of US.
`Attorney Kevin Ecker with
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket