throbber
Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-11 Filed 06/18/21 Page 1 of 6
`Case 1:19-cv-11586—FDS Document 200-11 Filed 06/18/21 Page 1 of 6
`
`EXHIBIT K
`
`EXHIBIT K
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-11 Filed 06/18/21 Page 2 of 6
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Rodrigues, Ruben J.
`Eric Speckhard
`BOST - F - Philips - Fitbit; Philips - Fitbit; Fitbit Philips DC Service; Karim Oussayef; Okano, David; Peterman, Chad
`[Ext] RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Philips v. Fitbit - Scope of Review and Dr. Buy"s contact information.
`Tuesday, May 11, 2021 10:53:37 AM
`
`**EXTERNAL EMAIL** This email originated from outside the company. Do not click on any link unless you recognize the
`sender and have confidence the content is safe.
`
`Hi Eric,
`
`Per my prior discussion with Karim, we proposed not focusing on the individuals listed for correspondence
`having nothing to do with the present dispute with Fitbit and which would not be relevant regardless of
`privilege. That said, below please find more details for these individuals.
`
`We are looking into your request with regards to “professional statutes” in the Netherlands, but will not have
`a response by tomorrow, May 12th. That said, we note that this is a district court decision that does not
`appear to have been endorsed by an appellate court, appears to specifically relate to privilege issues with
`respect to a criminal statute (and note patent related issues), and further understand the decision as dealing
`with exclusively foreign counsel (including foreign counsel working in the Netherlands) rather than domestic
`counsel working domestically in the Netherlands. Regardless, we don’t see this decision as controlling
`whether or not the logged communications should be protected as privileged in the United States.
`
`We are also evaluating your concerns with regards to what you’ve referred to as individuals merely being
`registered as patent agents, and in particular disagree with any attempt to equate the scope of a Dutch Patent
`Attorney as limited to patent prosecution activities.
`
`Here is the additional information for the individuals you identified:
`
`
`Employer Title/Position
`Philips
`IP&S Manager Healthcare
`
`Attorney Reg.
`Indian Patent Attorney
`
`Senior IP Counsel
`Principal IP Counsel
`Legal Counsel
`Senior Director, IP Licensing
`& Acquisition
`Senior IP Counsel
`IP&S Licensing Program Lead
`China
`IP Counsel
`Global Marketing, Sales &
`Account Mngr, Integrated
`Technology Solutions
`Licensing Program
`IP Counsel
`
`European Patent Attorney
`
`Registered Dutch Attorney
`
`U.S. Attorney
`Chinese Patent Attorney
`
`Chinese Patent Attorney
`
`European & French Patent
`Attorney
`European Patent Attorney
`European and Canadian Patent
`Attorney
`
`Name
`Viswanathan
`Seshan
`Andrei Filip
`Rudy Roth
`Laura Bonnes
`Rob Voorkamp
`
`Tawfik Goma
`Peter Zhang
`
`Dan Shang
`Rob Groen
`
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Olivier Claveau
`
`Philips
`
`Pavan Kapoor
`Francois Drapeau-
`Paquin
`
`Philips
`Philips
`
`IP Counsel
`Senior IP Counsel
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-11 Filed 06/18/21 Page 3 of 6
`
`Brint Yorks
`Karen van Dalen
`Kevin Ecker
`Kate Asher
`Alison Jimerson
`Frank Mueller
`Michael Haas
`Hannie van Iersel
`
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Senior IP Counsel
`Lead IP Analyst
`Senior IP Counsel
`Senior IP Counsel
`Senior IP Counsel
`Senior IP Counsel
`Senior IP Counsel
`IP Business Partner, Senior
`Director
`
`U.S. Attorney
`
`U.S. Attorney
`U.S. Attorney
`U.S. Attorney
`European Patent Attorney
`U.S. Attorney
`European and Dutch Patent
`Attorney
`
`
`
`From: Eric Speckhard <ESpeckhard@desmaraisllp.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 6:49 PM
`To: Rodrigues, Ruben J. <RRodrigues@foley.com>
`Cc: BOST - F - Philips - Fitbit <BOSTFPhilipsFitbit@foley.com>; Philips - Fitbit <Philips-
`Fitbit@paulhastings.com>; Fitbit Philips DC Service <FitbitPhilipsDCService@desmaraisllp.com>; Karim
`Oussayef <KOussayef@desmaraisllp.com>; Okano, David <davidokano@paulhastings.com>; Peterman, Chad
`<chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>
`Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Philips v. Fitbit - Scope of Review and Dr. Buy's contact information.
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL MESSAGE **
`
`Hi Ruben,
`
`Thank you for providing supplemental information regarding the individuals identified in Philips’s privilege log.
`
`To assess Philips’s privilege claims, we still need some further information. First, can you provide
`corresponding supplemental information for the following individuals who appear to have been omitted from
`the table you provided on 5/3.
`
`
`Name
`
`Viswanathan Seshan
`Andrei Filip
`Rudy Roth
`Laura Bonnes
`Rob Voorkamp
`Tawfik Goma
`Peter Zhang
`Dan Shang
`Rob Groen
`Olivier Claveau
`Pavan Kapoor
`Fancois Drapeau-Paquin
`Brint Yorks
`Karen van Dalen
`Kevin Ecker
`Kate Asher
`Alison Jimerson
`Frank Mueller
`Michael Haas
`
`Entries
`
`1
`5
`5, 368, 370, 373
`5
`13-17
`80
`81, 83, 87-88
`81, 83, 87-88
`148
`148-49
`149
`182, 255
`301, 304-06, 308, 310-313
`343-348, 371-72, 374-75, 377-78, 384, 398
`437-38, 440-41, 443, 451-64
`444
`444
`444
`444
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-11 Filed 06/18/21 Page 4 of 6
`
`Hannie van Iersel
`
`444
`
`
`Second, a recent decision from the Court of Rotterdam held that in-house counsel (foreign or domestic)
`working in the Netherlands must sign a “professional statute” (i.e. a signed, written agreement) guaranteeing
`their independence in order for their advice to be privileged. That decision can be read here:
`https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBROT:2021:527. Accordingly, Fitbit needs to
`know whether Philips’s in-house counsel (attorneys and patent agents) have entered into such professional
`statutes.
`
`Finally, it also appears that a number of communications on Philips’s privilege log pertain to patent agents
`(who are not licensed attorneys) providing advice on issues other than patent prosecution. (See, e.g., Entry
`Nos. 2-4; 6-12; 16-28; etc.). If that is the case, can you please explain Philips’s contention that those
`communications are privileged? Our understanding is that the scope of potential privilege over a patent
`agent’s communications does not extend beyond the subject of patent prosecution. If that is not the case,
`can you please amend the privilege log to clarify that the entries relate to patent prosecution.
`
`Could you please provide this information by May 12th so that Fitbit can fully review the log and respond, if
`necessary, by the agreed-upon May 21 deadline?
`
`Best,
`Eric
`
`
`From: Rodrigues, Ruben J. <RRodrigues@foley.com>
`Sent: Monday, May 3, 2021 4:52 PM
`To: Karim Oussayef <KOussayef@desmaraisllp.com>; Okano, David <davidokano@paulhastings.com>;
`Peterman, Chad <chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>
`Cc: BOST - F - Philips - Fitbit <BOSTFPhilipsFitbit@foley.com>; Philips - Fitbit <Philips-
`Fitbit@paulhastings.com>; Fitbit Philips DC Service <FitbitPhilipsDCService@desmaraisllp.com>
`Subject: [Ext] RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Philips v. Fitbit - Scope of Review and Dr. Buy's contact information.
`
`**EXTERNAL EMAIL** This email originated from outside the company. Do not click on any link unless you recognize the
`sender and have confidence the content is safe.
`
`Hi Karim,
`
`Please see the below information concerning individuals identified in the privilege log in accordance with our
`prior discussion.
`
`
`Name
`Erik Pastink
`
`Employer
`Philips
`
`Title/Position
`Senior IP Counsel
`
`Arie Tol
`
`Philips
`
`Principal Licensing Counsel
`
`Jako Eleveld
`
`Philips
`
`Head of IP Licensing
`
`Attorney Reg.
`Registered Dutch and
`European Patent
`Attorney
`Registered Dutch and
`European Patent
`Attorney
`Registered Dutch and
`European Patent
`Attorney
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-11 Filed 06/18/21 Page 5 of 6
`
`Joost Bekkers
`
`Philips
`
`Senior Director, IP Licensing
`
`Sam Knight
`
`Philips
`
`Senior IP Counsel
`
`Navin Natoewal
`
`Elias Schilowitz
`Stephanie van
`Wermeskerken
`
`Philips
`
`Philips
`Philips
`
`General Manager Integrated
`Technology Solutions
`Senior IP Counsel
`Head of IP Counseling, Vice
`President
`
`Edward Blocker
`
`Philips
`
`David Schreiber
`Pierre Hendriks
`Maaike van Velzen
`
`Brian Hinman
`Michael Marion
`Paul Im
`Sherry Austin
`Mark Beloborodov
`
`John Chudziak
`Arnold Niessen
`
`Hugo Sakkers
`Marnix van Ginneken
`
`Gregory Hatfield
`
`Jap Jongedijk
`
`Bjorn Teuwsen
`Ewoud Caspers
`Gabrielle Wellens
`Peter Coops
`
`Hans Hofstraat
`Joerg Habetha
`
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Philips
`
`Philips
`
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Philips
`Philips
`
`IP Counseling Manager;
`Principal IP Counsel;
`IP&S Licensing Manager
`Head of IP&S Americas
`Controller IP Licensing
`Head of IP Portfolio Management
`
`Chief IP Officer
`Principal IP Licensing Counsel
`Patent Attorney
`Senior IP Counsel
`IP Portfolio & Counseling
`Manager
`Legal Counsel
`Senior IP Counsel
`
`Head of Legal, IP&S
`Chief Legal Officer and Executive
`Vice President
`Head of Legal for M&A and
`Alliances
`Head of Corporate & Financial
`Law
`Communications Business Partner
`Senior Legal Counsel
`Finance Business Partner
`IP Portfolio Management
`
`VP, Research
`Business Leader Health Suite
`Clinical Platforms and HealthSuite
`Insights at Philips
`
`John Kroeze
`
`Philips
`
`Opportunity Identification Officer
`
`Ronald Aarts
`Chris Kuyper
`Alwin Marsman
`
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Research Fellow (Professor)
`Senior IP Counsel
`Senior IP Counsel
`
`Registered Dutch and
`European Patent
`Attorney
`Believed to be EU
`Patent Attorney
`
`U.S. Attorney
`Registered Dutch and
`European Patent
`Attorney
`U.S. Attorney
`
`U.S. Attorney
`
`Registered Dutch and
`European Patent
`Attorney
`
`U.S. Attorney
`U.S. Attorney
`U.S. Attorney
`U.S. Attorney
`
`German Attorney
`Registered Dutch and
`European Patent
`Attorney
`Dutch Attorney
`Dutch Attorney
`
`Australian Attorney
`
`Dutch Attorney
`
`Dutch Attorney
`
`Registered Dutch and
`European Patent
`Attorney
`
`Registered Dutch and
`European Patent
`Attorney
`
`U.S. Attorney
`Registered Dutch and
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-11586-FDS Document 200-11 Filed 06/18/21 Page 6 of 6
`
`Kees Roos
`Sergio Levi
`John Frank
`Bill Gaussa
`
`Frank Heldens
`Steffanie Bristol
`
`Umashankar
`Shivanand
`Katie Biegler
`
`Annick Bron
`
`Frank Decosta
`Daniel Chung
`Kevin Scott
`
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Philips
`
`Philips
`
`Philips
`
`Finnegan
`Finnegan
`Philips
`
`Clement Revetti
`
`Philips
`
`Michael van
`Leeuwen
`Ceren Pala Okat
`
`Brian Wieghaus
`Marleen Bollen
`
`Philips
`
`Philips
`
`Philips
`Philips
`
`Research Engineer
`VP, Head of Strategic Alliances
`VP and General Manager
`Head of Advanced
`Innovation/Venture Leader
`Head of Finance
`Strategic Alliances and
`Partnerships
`Director of Product Management &
`New Business Development
`Program Manager, Strategic
`Alliances and Partnerships
`Executive Assistant Strategy,
`M&A and Partnerships
`IP Attorney and Partner
`IP Attorney and Partner
`Licensing Program Leader
`
`Head of Legal, Philips North Am.;
`Head of Legal, Global Business
`Groups
`Head of Philips IP&S, Senior Vice
`President
`Head of Legal Operations &
`Outside Counsel Management
`Senior IP Counsel
`
`Principal Licensing Counsel
`Assistant
`
`European Patent
`Attorney
`
`U.S. Attorney
`U.S. Attorney
`UK and European
`Patent Attorney
`U.S. Attorney
`
`Dutch Attorney
`
`Turkish and European
`Patent Attorney
`U.S. Attorney
`
`
`
`From: Rodrigues, Ruben J.
`Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 9:38 PM
`To: Karim Oussayef <KOussayef@desmaraisllp.com>; Okano, David <davidokano@paulhastings.com>;
`Peterman, Chad <chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>
`Cc: BOST - F - Philips - Fitbit <BOSTFPhilipsFitbit@foley.com>; Philips - Fitbit <Philips-
`Fitbit@paulhastings.com>; Fitbit Philips DC Service <FitbitPhilipsDCService@desmaraisllp.com>
`Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Philips v. Fitbit - Scope of Review and Dr. Buy's contact information.
`
`Hi Karim,
`
`As explained on our call, we are looking into your request and can agree to provide this information at least
`for the logged communications that relate to Fitbit and/or this litigation. I can’t really estimate when we will
`have that at this time, but we can agree to toll any deadlines for discovery motions relating to the privilege
`log.
`
`From: Karim Oussayef <KOussayef@desmaraisllp.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 7:58 PM
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket