UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before The Honorable Theodore R. Essex
`
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN MOBILE DEVICES AND
`
`RELATED SOFTWARE
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-750
`
`RESPONDENT MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.’S RESPONSES TO APPLE’S
`OBJECTIONS TO THE WITNESS STATEMENT OF SAMUEL BRUNET
`
`Pursuant to Order No. 12, Complainant Apple, Inc’s (“Apple”) served its objections to
`
`the witness statement of Samuel Brunet on Friday, September 9, 2011. No specific date for
`
`Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) to respond to Apple’s objections to the Brunet witness
`
`statement was established. Accordingly, Motorola hereby submits its responses to Apple’s
`
`objections to the witness statement of Samuel Brunet, M4 862C, promptly after receipt of
`
`Apple’s objections. Motorola’s responses to Apple’s objections to the Brunet witness statement
`
`are listed below. These responses are based on the objections asserted by Apple. Motorola
`
`specifically reserves the right to amend these responses in the event that Apple clarifies its
`
`objections or raises new objections. Motorola also reserves the right to respond to any
`
`evidentiary objections raised in Apple’s motions in limine or otherwise.
`
`MOTOROLA’S RESPONSES TO APPLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS TO THE WITNESS
`
`STATEMENT [RXJSISZC] OF SAMUEL BRUNET
`
`Motorola’s Responses to Apple‘s Objections
`
`j Question and
`Answer
`Number in
`l
`Witness
`I
`Statement
`
`
`
`Notcsffixhib
`its
`
`Objections
`
`i"""o".17,2o,2'1,
`
`

`

`
`
`Question and
`
`Answer
`
`Notcsi’lfixllib
`
`its
`
`
`
`E’Motorola'3 Responses to Apple5 Objections
`
`Number in
`Witness
`
`Statement
`
`—,27 33 41 42,
`43, 62649 99~
`MMngQQgiQLMV/flwm
`
`l
`
`Q 22, 23
`
`Q. 24, 253 109,
`no
`
`W
`
`w 2.
`
`Q. 58
`
`,
`I
`
`Objections
`
`FRE 702
`
`WW
`
`FRE 701
`FREE 702
`FRE 602
`
`FRE 701
`FRE 702
`FRE 9 1
`’
`
`FRE 701
`FRE 702
`FRE 611
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WMMMWMW
`
`
`
`This question does not suggest an answer and is
`therefore not leading.
`Not opinion testimony by a lay witness and not
`expert opinion testimony. The questions call for
`i
`E
`Q 1 14417
`i and the testnnony offers facts based on Mr.
`E
`3X-644c
`E
`'
`i Brunet’s personal knowledge.
`1
`E
`E
`E E
`The testimony is relevant to nonintingeflmflent
`
`EQ 12 E
`E
`EEThe testimony provides background information
`EWW
`__W_ ‘ ”WW
`' concerningthe witness.
`q
`E RX 1248
`EFoundation for the identified exhibits and for
`E 4657 6780 82* 1 RA1247er Brunet5; personal knowledge are provided
`1Q3l 32 .1437 E RX1246
`94
`E RX 125]
`in his testimony. Further foundation, if needed
`E
`RX717
`E
`_ may be provided on redirect.
`
`.wMVMM»2W_W_WW__MMMWWWMMWwho”.W).
`
` E E E
`
`
`
`WE
`
`
`
`FRE 701
`FRE 702
`1?ng 40?
`‘
`t
`FREE 402
`
`
`
`
`
`expert opinion testimony. The questions call for
`and the testimony offers facts based on Mr
`
`Brunet s 'EeLanalknowled e. WE
`Not opinion testimony by a lay witness and not
`expert opinion testimony. The questions call for
`and the testimony offers facts based on Mr.
`Brunet’s personal knowledge.
`
`Foundation for Mr. Brunet’s personal knowledge
`is provided in his earlier testimony. Further
`foundation, if needed, may be provided on re—
`” direct.
`Not opinion testimony by a lay witness and not
`expert opinion testimony. The questions call for
`and the testimony offers facts based on Mr.
`Brunet’s personal knowledge.
`
`The testimony is factual testimony based on Mr.
`Brunet’s personal knowledge.
`It is neither
`-J
`.1 expert opinion nor legal argument.
`Not opinion testimony by a lay witness and not
`expert opinion testimony. The questions call for
`and the testimony offers facts based on Mr.
`Brunet’s personal knowledge.
`
`
`
`

`

`Question and
`Answer
`
`NotesiExhib
`its
`
`.
`
`Number in
`Witness
`
`Motorola’s Responses to Apple’s Objections
`
`Objections
`
`
`
`Statement
`
`
`RX-7 1 0
`
`WWMWMEW WWW“ WWW“-
`
`WWMMMWm“
`
`September 12, 201 1
`
`/’?
`
`
`3:,
`,7 2,”
`
`t
`
`x
`
`.
`
`, j
`
`
`
`Roflmllfifsyjm 9E1!
`
`
`Kim/C
` ' teptoe & Johnson LLP
`
`if» 1330 Connecticut Avenue? NW.
`Washington, DC 20036
`Home No. (202) 429~8162
`
`Charles K. Vorhoovon
`
`David Eiseman
`
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`50 Cali‘f‘omia Street, 22nd Floor
`
`San Francisco, CA 9411 1
`Phone No. (415) 8756600
`
`Edward J. DeFranco
`
`Stephen Straub
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`51 Madison Avonue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`
`Phone No. (212) 849-7000
`
`David A. Nelson
`
`Quinn Emanuo} Urquhart 5i: Suiiivan LLP
`500 West Madison St? Suite 2&50
`Chicago; 1L 60661
`Phone No. (312) 46342965
`
`Attorfzaysfor {iiegpondml Molomia
`Mobility, Inc.
`
`

`

`Certain Mobile Devices and Related Software
`Investigation N0. 33 7- TA~750
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on, September 12, 2011 she caused
`RESPONDENT MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.’S RESPONSES TO APPLE’S
`OBJECTIONS TO THE WITNESS STATEMENT OF SAMUEL BRUNET
`
`to be served upon the parties as indicated below:
`
`El Via First Class Mail
`E1
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`(Original plus six)
`Via Electronic Filing (EDIS)
`Via Overnight Courier
`Via Facsimile
`
`Via E-mail (PDF)
`
`121
`
`[:1
`
`1:1
`[:1
`
`
`The Honorable Theodore R. Essex
`[I]
`Via First Class Mail
`
`The Honorable James Holbein
`
`Secretary
`US. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW, Room 1 12-1?
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Administrative Law Judge
`US. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW, Room 317
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`500 E Street, SW
`Washington, DC 20436
`
` [3 Via First Class Mail
`
`
`El
`Lisa Kattan
`Via First Class Mail
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`US. International Trade Commission
`
`12 Via Hand Delivery
`Two Copies
`Via Overnight Courier
`Via Facsimile
`
`Cl
`
`Via E-mail (PDF)
`
`C]
`E]
`
`1:]
`
`1:1
`
`1:1
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
`Via Facsimile
`
`/\
`121 Via Email (PDF)
`lisakattanraxusitc. ‘ on
`
`
`
`
`Mark Davis, Esq.
`Weil, Gotshall & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`12’] Via Hand Delivery
`[:1 Via Overnight Courier
`1:1 Via Facsimile
`
`Counsel for Complainant, Apple Inc:
`
`121 Via E-mail (PDF)
`a
`[a more, Zg'jfniweil. com
`lec‘ovf’kléeou com
`
`
`Wei! TL G, ,4 gig/e. Moro. $550. egLeKnaZi/{iiweil com
`
`
`
` " ,2 %Senior
`
`
`
`
`Para egal Specialist
`
`\i
`
`