STEPTOE &}oHNsoNw
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`Jamie B. Beaber
`
`202.429.6286
`jbeaber@steptoe.com
`
`B30 Connecticut Avenue. NW
`
`Washington, DC 200364795
`Tel 202.429.3000
`Fax 2024293902
`steptoe.com
`
`July 29, 2011
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC DELIVERY
`
`The Honorable James Holbein
`
`Secretary
`U.S. Intemational Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112—F
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Dear Secretary Holbein:
`
`Re: Certain Mobile Devices and Related Software
`Investigation No. 33 7-TA- 750
`
`Enclosed for submission in the above—referenced action please find the Joint Motion to
`Modify the Procedural Schedule for Certain Prehearing dates filed on behalf of Respondents
`Motorola Inc., n/k/a Motorola Solutions, Inc., and Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) and
`Complainant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) (collectively, “the Parties”).
`
`Please do not hesitate to contact me directly at 202.429.6286 should have any
`questions.
`
`
` mie B. Beaber
`
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20036
`Tel: 202.429.6286
`Fax: 202.429.3902
`
`Counselfor Motorola, Inc. n/k/a Motorola Solutions,
`Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc.
`
`WASHINGTON - NEWYORK - CHICAGO -
`
`PHOENIX 0
`
`LOS ANCELES
`
`-
`
`CENTURY CITY -
`
`LONDON 0
`
`BRUSSELS
`
`0
`
`BEIJING
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before The Honorable Theodore R. Essex
`
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTAIN MOBILE DEVICES AND
`RELATED SOFTWARE
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA—750
`
`JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
`FOR CERTAIN PREHEARING DATES
`
`Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.15 and Ground Rule 3, Respondents Motorola Inc.,
`
`n/k/a Motorola Solutions, Inc., and Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) and Complainant
`
`Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) (collectively, “the Parties”), respectfully move to adjust the Procedural
`
`Schedule to permit additional time for certain prehearing events and to facilitate the efficient
`
`completion of prehearing submissions. The proposed modifications to the Procedural Schedule
`
`apply equally to both parties and will not affect the pre—hearing conference or the hearing dates,
`
`which are currently scheduled for September 23, 2011 and September 26 — October 5, 2011,
`
`respectively.
`
`The current procedural schedule, Order No. 5 as amended by Order No. 8, establishes the
`
`following deadlines for prehearing events:
`
`
`
`August 15, 2011
`
`
`
`,
`
` uust
` August 19, 2011
`
`statements, with physical and demonstrative
`exhibits available, by the private pafis
`Submit and serve direct exhibits, including witness
`statements, with h sical and demonstrative
`
`
`
`
`
`0242651764/4273721.]
`
`1
`
`

`
`
`
` August 19, 2011
`
`
`August 22, 2011
`
`
`
`exhibits available, by the Staff
`File pre-hearing statements and briefs by the
`
`rivate arties
`File requests for receipt of evidence without a
`witness
`
`File objections to direct exhibits, including witness
`statements
`
`August 26, 2011
`
`August 31, 2011
`
`Se tember 2, 2011
`September 2, 2011
`September 6, 2011
`
`September 7, 2011
`
`
`
`Submit and serve rebuttal exhibits, including
`witness statements
`
`Deadline for motions in limine
`
`__File pre-hearing statement and brief by the staff
`File responses to objections to direct exhibits,
`includin witness statements
`
`File objections to rebuttal exhibits, including
`witness statements
`
`
`
`
`
`ob'ections statement
`riori
`File responses to objections to rebuttal exhibits,
`includin witness statements
`
`Se tember 7, 2011
`
`
`
`September 13, 2011
`
`File res onses to motions in limine
`
`File responses to high priority objections statement
`Submission of declarations justifying
`confidentiality of exhibits
`
`Se tember 14,2011
`September 14, 2011
`September 19, 2011
`
`Good cause exists to extend the deadlines as requested herein. The parties propose the
`
`following revised procedural schedule in order to most efficiently approach prehearing events
`
`and in an effort to reduce evidentiaxy issues and/or objections that may be presented to the
`
`Administrative Law Judge. The parties note that the proposed schedule below includes
`
`additional specific deadlines for prehearing events such as the exchange of deposition
`
`designations, counter-designations and completeness designation. The parties believe that these
`
`additional deadlines will facilitate orderly and efficient hearing preparation.
`
`
`
`
` Aiuilst 15
`August 17
`
`Exchane of exhibit lists among the arties
`
`
` Exchan e initial deposition desinations
`
`Submissions concerning whether expert reports
`should be offered as exhibits
`
`
`
`Submit and serve direct exhibits, including witness
`statements, with physical and demonstrative
`exhibits available, b the rivate arties
`
`
`0242651764/4273721.!
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`August 22
`(Exchange between
`_o arties
`
`
`
`

`
`Submit and serve direct exhibits, including witness
`statements, with physical and demonstrative
`exhibits available, by the Staff
`File pre—hearing statements and briefs by the
`private parties
`File requests for receipt of evidence without a
`witness
`
`Exchange deposition counter-designations and
`ob‘ections to initial desi nations
`
`File objections to direct exhibits, including witness
`statements
`
`Exchange any completeness designations and
`objections to counter designations; finalize
`depgsitions to be submitted as exhibits
`Submit and serve rebuttal exhibits, including
`witness statements
`
`Deadline for motions in limirze
`‘Lil; prehearingfltement and brief by the staff
`File responses to objections to direct exhibits,
`includin witness statements
`
`File high priority o_l3j'e_c’t_ions statement
`Submission of final prehearing direct and rebuttal
`exhibits, including joint exhibits (including witness
`statements }
`File objections to rebuttal exhibits, including
`witness statements
`
`File responses to objections to rebuttal exhibits,
`includin witness statements
`
`_.j.
`
`August 26
`
`August 26
`
`1
`
`August 29
`
`August 29
`
`September 2
`
`September 5
`
`September 5
`(Exchange between
`arties
`
`September 6
`Seppfiiber 9
`September 9
`
`September 9
`September 12
`
`September 12
`
`September 16
`
`File res onses to motions in limine
`File responses to high priority objections statement
`
`September 16
`September 16
`
`The parties agree that the granting of this joint request will not affect any other deadlines
`
`contained in the current procedural schedule in this investigation.
`
`The Staff has indicated that it does not oppose this motion.
`
`Accordingly, and for good cause shown, Motorola and Apple respectfully request that the
`
`presiding Administrative Law Judge issue an order permitting the parties to proceed with respect
`
`to prehearing events as outlined above.
`
`0242651764/4273721.!
`
`3
`
`

`
`Dated: July 29, 2011
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` amie B. Beaber
`
`
`
`Steptoe & Johnson LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`Tel.: (202) 429-8162
`
`Charles K. Verhoeven
`
`David Eiseman
`
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`
`San Francisco, CA 9411 1
`Tel.: (415) 875-6600
`
`Edward J. DeFranco
`
`Stephen T. Straub
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel.: (212) 849-7000
`
`David A. Nelson
`
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`500 West Madison Street, Ste. 2450
`Chicago, IL 60661
`Tel.: (312) 705-7400
`
`Attorneys for Respondents Motorola
`Solutions, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc.
`
`41/
`
`axe;
`_
`G. Davis
`
`~/MW“ r///
`
`Robert T. Vlasis
`
`Edward S. J ou
`
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Tel.: (202) 682-7000
`
`Matthew D. Powers
`
`Steven S. Cherensky
`Paul T. Ehrlich
`
`Robert L. Gerrity
`Tensegrity Law Group LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Tel.: (650) 802-6000
`
`Attorneys for Complainant Apple Inc.
`
`0242651764/4273721 .1
`
`

`
`Certain Mobile Devices and Related Software
`Investigation No. 33 7- TA-750
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on, July 29, 2011 she caused the
`Joint Motion To Modify The Procedural Schedule For Certain Prehering Dates
`to be served upon the parties as indicated below:
`
`The Honorable James Holbein
`
`Via First Class Mail
`
`Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112—F
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`The Honorable Theodore R. Essex
`
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW, Room 317
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Lisa Kattan
`
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`(Original plus six)
`Via Electronic Filing (EDIS)
`Via Overnight Courier
`Via Facsimile
`
`Via E-mail (PDF)
`
`
`
` lisa. kattan@usitc. 0v i_ElC|E|ElEli——UE|UEll]EIEIEIEI[Iii
`
`
`
`Via First Class Mail
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`Two Copies
`Via Overnight Courier
`Via Facsimile
`
`Via E-mail (PDF)
`
`Via First Class Mail
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
`Via Facsimile
`
`Via E-mail (PDF)
`
`Mark Davis, Esq.
`Weil, Gotshall & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`El Via First Class Mail
`
`IZ Via Hand Delivery
`El Via Overnight Courier
`El Via Facsimile
`
`Counselfor Complainant, Apple Inc.
`
`[21 Via E—mail (PDF)
`aggle. molo. 75 Ogciweil. com
`agglecovgalcov. com
`Wei] TLG./1 Qg/e. Moto. 750. external@_wei/. com
`
`C/\/5.).
`
`Ti akaRéégior
`
`l
`
`Paralegal Specialist