throbber
UNITEI) STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`WASHINGTON, DC
`
`Before The Honorable Theodore R. Essex
`
`In The Matter Of
`
`CERTAIN MOBILE DEVICES AND
`RELATED SOFTWARE
`
`Investigation No. 337—TA-750
`
`UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION OF COMPLAINANT APPLE,
`
`INC. AND RESPONDENTS MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. AND
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. FOR LEAVE TO TAKE CERTAIN
`DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF FACT DISCOVERY
`
`Pursuant to Commission Rules 210.15 and Ground Rule 3, Complainant Apple, Inc.
`
`("Apple") and Respondents Motorola Solutions, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc. ("Motorola")
`
`respectfully move for leave to take six depositions after the close of fact discovery.
`
`The current procedural schedule (Order No. 8) in this investigation establishes July 22,
`
`201 1 as the cutoff and completion date for fact discovery. To date, the parties have conducted
`
`31 depositions in this investigation, will take additional depositions this week, and seek leave to
`
`take six fact witness depositions after the July 22, 201 1 close of fact discovery (the hearing in
`
`this Investigation is scheduled for September 26, 2011). Despite diligent efforts by the parties,
`
`scheduling conflicts make it impracticable for the parties to complete six depositions that were
`
`identified and/or noticed within the fact discovery period.
`
`The outstanding fact depositions and their corresponding dates (to the extent known) are
`
`as follows:
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As noted above, with respect to four of the remaining six fact depositions, the parties and
`
`witnesses have tentatively scheduled the deposition dates and times based on witness
`
`availability. With respect to the two unscheduled fact depositions, which were requested by
`
`Motorola during the fact discovery period, Motorola is diligently working to schedule these
`
`depositions.
`
`Accordingly, and for good cause shown, Apple and Motorola respectfully request that the
`
`presiding Administrative Law Judge issue an order permitting the parties to take the depositions
`
`set forth above after the July 22, 2011 close of fact discovery.
`
`Dated: July 22, 2011
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`.«.
`
`M
`
`/ /(/l’9!»“"'
`
`avis
`ark G.
`Robert T. Vlasis
`Edward S. Jou
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Tel.: (202) 682-7000
`
`0242651764/4253968.2
`
`2
`
`.M
`
`Charles F. Schill
`Steptoe & Johnson LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`Tel.: (202) 429-8162
`
`Charles K. Verhoeven
`David Eiseman
`
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`
`

`
`Matthew D. Powers
`Steven S. Cherensky
`Jason D. Kipnis
`Paul T. Ehrlich
`
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Tel.: (650) 802~3000
`
`Attorneys)/i)r (_7()mplaim‘mI Apple Inc.
`
`50 Calilbriiia Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco. CA 941 1 1
`'l’e1.: (415) 875-6600
`
`Edward .1. DeFranCo
`Stephen '1“. Straub
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`
`Tel; (212) 849~7000
`
`David A. Nelson
`
`Quinn lrlmanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`500 West Madison Street, Ste. 2450
`Chicago, IL 60661
`Tel: (312) 705—7400
`
`Att()rneysf()r Respondents Motorola
`Solullirms, Inc‘. and Motorola Mobility, Inc.
`
`02426 51764/42539682
`
`D.)
`
`

`
`Cermin Mobile Devices and Related Software
`Investigation N0. .13 7- 724-75!)
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on, July 22, 201 1, she caused the
`Unopposed Joint Motion of Complainant Apple Inc. and Respondents
`Motorola Solutions, Inc. and Mototola Mobility, Inc. for Leave to
`Take Certain Depositions after the Close of Fact Discovery
`to be served on the parties as indicated below:
`
`Via First Class Mail
`
`Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW, Room ll2~F
`
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`The Honorable Theodore R. Essex
`
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW, Room 317
`
`Washington, l)C 20436
`
`Lisa Kattan
`
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW
`
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Mark Davis, Esq.
`Weil, Gotshall & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Counsel for (lamp/aimmt, Apple Inc.
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`(()/dginczlplus six)
`Via Electronic Filing (EDIS)
`Via Overnight Courier
`Via Facsimile
`
`Via l3—mail (PDF)
`
`Via First Class Mail
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`Two (j‘0pie.s'
`Via Overnight Courier
`Via Facsimile
`
`Via E—mail (PDF)
`
`EDDDDEDDamDUDEDD Via First Class Mail
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
`Via Facsimile
`
`Via Email (PDF)
`/L1/<.éi££§!f;£;£?;:L4§IL£é;£!tQE
`
`EDDEU Via First Class Mail
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
`Via Facsimile
`
`Via E—mail (PDF)
`ggglgiuglr). 75()ni>weiZ.c0n1
`agp/e7g‘_q}}L'z,.:Cov. com
`Wei!
`7‘/_. (1./l Q[)/Vt: Moro. 750. e.rler'na/zfflweil. com
`
`nn
`
`iii‘Timali<a R. pn
`Paralegal Specialist

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket