throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before the Honorable David P. Shaw
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`
`In the Matter of:
`
`CERTAIN ROAD MILLING
`MACHINES AND COMPONENTS
`THEREOF
`
`
`
`
`
`Investigation
`No. 337-TA-1067
`
`
`COMMISSION INVESTIGATIVE STAFF’S
` DISCOVERY STATEMENT
`
`
`ISSUES TO BE LITIGATED
`
`A. Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337, as alleged by
`
`the Complainant, by the Respondents’ importation into the United States, the sale for
`
`importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain road milling
`
`machines and components thereof (“Accused Products”);
`
`B. Whether, as alleged by the Complainant, the Respondents’ Accused Products
`
`directly or indirectly infringe one or more of:
`
`1.
`
`Claims 1–5, 7–12, and 14–17 of U.S. Patent No. 9,644,340 (“the ’340
`
`patent”);
`
`2.
`
`Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9–22, and 27–29 of U.S. Patent No. 9,624,628 (“the ’628
`
`patent”);
`
`3.
`
`Claims 1–7, 13–24, and 26 of U.S. Patent No. 9,656,530 (“the ’530
`
`patent”);
`
`4.
`
`Claims 1, 2, 4, 6–8, 11, 12, and 15–17 of U.S. Patent No. 7,530,641
`
`1
`
`I.
`
`
`
`

`

`(“the ’641 patent”);
`
`5.
`
`Claims 1–3, 5–24, and 26–36 of U.S. Patent No. 7,828,309 (“the ’309
`
`patent”) (collectively, the Asserted Claims”).
`
`C. Whether there exists a Domestic Industry with respect to Complainant’s products;
`
`whether these products practice at least one claim of each asserted patent; and whether
`
`there has been significant investment in plant and equipment, significant employment of
`
`labor or capital post-importation manufacturing, repair, technical support, warranty
`
`support, and training activities in the United States.
`
`D. Whether the Asserted Claims are invalid or unenforceable, and/or whether the
`
`Respondents have any other appropriate affirmative defense;
`
`E. Whether, in the event a violation of section 337 is found, the Commission should
`
`issue cease and desist orders directed to Respondents; and
`
`F.
`
`Whether, in the event a violation of section 337 is found, a bond should be
`
`imposed for imports and sales occurring during the presidential review period, and if so,
`
`the bond rate that should be imposed.
`
`The private parties are currently discussing a stipulation relating to various discovery related
`
`procedural matters (such as an amendment to the protective order for source code protections), to
`
`be filed shortly. The Staff does not object.
`
`II.
`
`
`
`EVIDENCE TO BE OFFERED BY THE STAFF
`
`Evidence obtained through discovery among the parties and from non-parties may be
`
`offered at the hearing by the Staff. This evidence may include the issues outlined in the Notice
`
`of Investigation and Section I supra.
`
`INFORMATION AND EVIDENCE THAT MAY BE SOUGHT FROM OTHER
`2
`
`III.
`
`
`
`

`

`PARTIES AND THIRD PERSONS
`
`
`
`To the extent necessary, the Staff intends to serve written discovery requests on the
`
`private parties to elicit relevant information. The Staff may also serve additional discovery
`
`requests on third parties as necessary. In particular, the Staff may request additional discovery
`
`from the private parties or third parties after the private parties identify the documents,
`
`information, and other evidence on which they intend to rely in support of their respective
`
`positions. Further, the Staff may notice for deposition and depose persons identified by the
`
`private parties as having information relevant to this proceeding, including experts that the
`
`parties intend to call for testimony at the hearing.
`
`
`
`The Staff will participate as appropriate in the depositions noticed by the private parties.
`
`In appropriate circumstances, the Staff may seek and serve subpoenas in order to obtain
`
`documents or testimony from third persons.
`
`PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION WITHOUT
`IV.
`FORMAL DISCOVERY METHODS
`
`
`
`The proposed procedural schedule includes dates for the exchange of information
`
`required by Ground Rule 6, and dates relating to disclosure of priority dates, claim terms, and
`
`domestic industry products.
`
`INFORMATION AND EVIDENCE THAT CAN BE OBTAINED ONLY BY
`V.
`DEPOSITION, INTERROGATORY, SUBPOENA, OR REQUEST FOR ADMISSION
`
`
`
`The Staff will endeavor to use, as much as possible, informal methods of obtaining
`
`information and evidence. Nonetheless, the formal discovery process may be the best method
`
`for efficient exchange of information among the parties. At this point, it is not known what
`
`information and evidence may be obtained only by deposition, interrogatory, subpoena, or
`
`request for admission.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`VI.
`
`
`
`JOINT PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
`
`In Order No. 5, requesting the submission of discovery statements, the presiding
`
`Administrative Law Judge tentatively scheduled the hearing in this investigation for
`
`April 19-24, 2018. Accordingly, the parties have jointly proposed a schedule with hearing
`
`dates of April 19, 2018 attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 22, 2017
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/Monisha Deka
`
`Margaret Macdonald, Director
`Jeffrey T. Hsu, Supervisory Attorney
`Monisha Deka, Investigative Attorney
`
`OFFICE OF UNFAIR IMPORT INVESTIGATIONS
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street SW, Suite 401
`Washington, DC 20436
`(202) 205-3180
`(202) 205-2158 (facsimile)
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Certificate of Service
`Investigation 337-TA-1067
`
`I, Monisha Deka, hereby certify that on September 22, 2017, copies of the foregoing Commission
`Investigative Staff’s Discovery Statement were served on parties as indicated below:
`
`
`U.S. International Trade Commission:
`
`
`
`The Honorable David. P Shaw
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 317
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`One copy by Hand Delivery with
`electronic courtesy copy
`
`
`
`One (1) copy by Electronic Mail
`
`
`
`One (1) copy by Electronic Mail
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Counsel for Complainant Wirtgen America,
`Inc.
`Daniel E. Yonan, Esq.
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX,
`PLLC
`l100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`Counsel for Respondents Caterpillar Prodotti
`Stradali S.r.L, Caterpillar Mitelli SpA,
`Caterpillar Americas CV, Caerpillar Paving
`Products, Inc., and Caterpillar, Inc.
`Christine E. Lehman , Esq.
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`/s/Monisha Deka
`Monisha Deka
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Suite 401
`Washington, DC 20436
`(202) 205-3180
`(202) 205-2158 (facsimile)
`
`

`

`Exhibit A
`
`JOINT PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
`
`Description
`
`Institution
`
`Complainants to file first declaration detailing
`efforts to reduce the number of patent claims
`and patents at issue, as well as a list of the
`patents and claims remaining at issue (GR 6.a)
`
`File list of claim terms that each party contends
`should be construed (GR 6.b)
`
`Exchange initial contention interrogatory
`responses regarding issues as to which the
`party bears the burden of proof
`
`Complainants to file list of all products they
`will rely upon to satisfy domestic industry
`requirement (GR 6.h)
`
`Date
`
`Friday, August 25, 2017
`
`Monday, October 2, 2017
`
`Wednesday, October 18, 2017
`
`Friday, October 27, 2017
`
`Friday, October 27, 2017
`
`Deadline for first settlement conference (GR 3)
`
`Friday, November 03, 2017
`
`Exchange proposed constructions for the claim
`terms that the parties contend should be
`construed
`
`Thursday, November 7, 2017
`
`File Notice of Prior Art (GR 2)
`
` Tuesday, November 7, 2017
`
`Thursday, November 09, 2017
`
`Friday, November 10, 2017
`
`Friday, November 10, 2017
`
`Deadline to meet and confer in an attempt to
`reconcile or otherwise limit disputed claim
`terms and jointly identify terms most
`significant to resolving disputes (GR 6.b)
`
`Submission of First Settlement Conference
`Joint Report (GR 3)
`
`Exchange initial contention interrogatory
`responses regarding issues as to which the
`party does not bear the burden of proof
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Description
`
`Date
`
`File proposed constructions of claim terms
`identified by each party (GR 6.c)
`
`File joint list of disputed claim terms and
`proposed constructions thereof and joint list of
`claim terms that must be construed but whose
`meanings are not disputed and the joint
`proposed constructions thereof (GR 6.b, c)
`
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow issues
`in preparation of the Joint Claim Construction
`chart (GR 6.c)
`
`Parties to file joint statement identifying
`accused products (GR 6.h)
`
`File Joint Claim Construction chart containing
`construction of those terms on which the
`parties agree; including each party's proposed
`construction of disputed terms; the ten most
`significant terms; and any dispositive terms
`(GR 6.d)
`
`File identification of expert witnesses,
`including their expertise and curriculum vitae
`(GR 4.a)
`
`Complainants to file list of proposed
`representative accused products based on
`infringement contentions (GR 6.h)
`
`File tentative list of witnesses a party will call
`to testify at the hearing, with an identification
`of each witness's relationship to the party
`
`Respondents file responses to Complainants'
`proposed representative accused products (GR
`6.h)
`
`Each party files initial claim construction brief
`(GR 6.e)
`
`Exchange final contention interrogatory
`responses regarding issues as to which the
`
`
`
`7
`
`Tuesday, November 14, 2017
`
`Tuesday, November 21, 2017
`
`Tuesday, November 28, 2017
`
`Tuesday, November 28, 2017
`
`Friday, December 01, 2017
`
`Tuesday, December 05, 2017
`
`Tuesday, December 05, 2017
`
`Tuesday, December 05, 2017
`
`Wednesday, December 20, 2017
`
`Tuesday, December 22, 2017
`
`Wednesday, January 3, 2018
`
`

`

`Description
`
`Date
`
`party bears the burden of proof (subject to
`supplementation based on later discovery)
`
`Each party files reply claim construction brief
`(GR 6.e)
`
`Parties to file joint stipulation regarding
`representative accused products (GR 6.h)
`
`Exchange final contention interrogatory
`responses regarding issues as to which the
`party does not bear the burden of proof (subject
`to supplementation based on later discovery)
`
`Friday, January 8, 2018
`
`Monday, January 08, 2018
`
`Wednesday, January 17, 2018
`
`Fact Discovery cutoff and completion
`
`Wednesday, January 17, 2018
`
`Deadline for motions to compel-discovery
`
`Monday, January 22, 2018
`
`Parties file joint technology stipulation (GR
`6.i)
`
`Deadline for responses to motions to compel
`discovery
`
`Tuesday, January 23, 2018
`
`Tuesday, January 30, 2018
`
`File initial expert reports (GR 4.b)
`
`Wednesday, January 31, 2018
`
`File rebuttal expert reports (GR 4.b)
`
`Tuesday, February 13, 2018
`
`Deadline for filing summary determination
`motions
`
`Parties to submit (to administrative law judge)
`PDF versions of initial and rebuttal expert
`reports on CD, DVD, or flash drive (GR4.b)
`
`Friday, February 16, 2018
`
`Thursday, February 22, 2018
`
`Expert discovery cutoff and completion
`
`Friday, March 02, 2018
`
`Exchange of exhibit lists among the parties
`
`Friday, March 09, 2018
`
`Exchange direct exhibits (including witness
`statements), with physical and demonstrative
`exhibits available
`
`Tuesday, March 13, 2018
`
`Deadline for second settlement conference
`
`Wednesday, March 14, 2018
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Description
`
`(GR 3)
`
`Date
`
`Exchange deposition designations
`
`Friday, March 16, 2018
`
`Submission of Second Settlement Conference
`Joint Report (GR3)
`
`Exchange rebuttal exhibits (including witness
`statements), with physical and demonstrative
`exhibits available
`
`Exchange counter deposition designations
`
`File prehearing statements and brief, including
`(a) witness list (GR 7.a); (b) exhibit list (GR
`7.b); and (c) statement of issues to be
`considered at the hearing (GR 7.c)
`
`File High Priority Objections (GR 9.f)
`
`Deadline for filing motions in limine
`
`File receipt of evidence without a sponsoring
`witness
`
`File responses to high priority objections
`
`Deadline for filing responses to motions in
`limine
`
`Staff - File prehearing statements and brief,
`including (a) witness list (GR 7.a); (b) exhibit
`list (GR 7.b); and (c) statement of issues to be
`considered at the hearing (GR 7.c)
`
`Submit proposed exhibit lists and exhibits on a
`single drive, including witness statements in
`binders and on a single drive (GR 8.a, 9.d)
`
`Wednesday, March 21, 2018
`
`Tuesday, March 27, 2018
`
`Friday, March 30, 2018
`
`Friday, March 30, 2018
`
`Monday, April 02, 2018
`
`Monday, April 02, 2018
`
`Monday, April 02, 2018
`
`Monday, April 9, 2018
`
`Monday, April 9, 2018
`
`Wednesday, April 11, 2018
`
`Tuesday, April 17, 2018
`
`Pre-Hearing Conference
`
`Thursday, April 19, 2018
`
`Hearing
`
`Thursday, April 19, 2018 to Tuesday, April
`24, 2018
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Description
`
`File initial post-hearing briefs, set of final
`exhibits (GR 9.g), final exhibit lists (GR 9.h),
`and joint outline of the issues to be decided in
`the final ID (GR 1l.a)
`
`Date
`
`Friday, May 11, 2018
`
`File reply post-hearing briefs
`
`Wednesday, May 23, 2018
`
`Deadline to submit binder set of final exhibit
`lists and exhibits to the Office of General
`Counsel (GR 9.i)
`
`Friday, June 22, 2018
`
`Initial Determination due
`
`Friday, August 24, 2018
`
`Target date for completion of Investigation
`
`Wednesday, December 26, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket