`
`Washington, D.C..
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN GRAPHIC SYSTEMS,
`COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND
`CONSUMER PRODUCTS CONTAINING
`THE SAME
`
`~
`
`p
`
`Inv. N0. 337-TA-1044
`
`ORDER NO. 42:
`
`_ GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO AMEND
`PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE [MOTION DOCKET
`NO. 1044-037]
`
`(September 22, 2017)
`
`On September 22, 2017, pursuant to 19 C.F.R."§ 210.15, Complainants Advanced Micro
`
`Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies ULC, LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG
`
`Electronics MobileCorrnn U.S.A., Inc., Vizio, Inc., MediaTek lnc., MediaTek USA Inc., and
`
`Sigma Designs, Inc. (collectively, the “Private Parties”) jointly moved to amend the procedural‘
`
`schedule (“Motion”) to confonn the last day to file summary determination motions with the
`
`requirements of Commission Rule 21018.1 (Motion Docket No. 1044-037; Mot. at 1.).
`
`Pursuant to Ground Rule 2.2, the Private Parties submit that Commission Investigative Staff
`
`(“Staff”) does not oppose their Motion. (1d.).
`
`The evidentiary hearing in this Investigation (“Hearing”) was originally scheduled to
`
`begin on December 11, 2017. (See Order N0. 6.). On July 19, 2017, the Hearing was
`
`' Commission Rule 201.18 states in-relevant pant: “Notwithstanding any other rule, the deadline for filing
`summary determinations shall be computed by counting backward at least 60 days including the first
`calendar day prior to the date the hearing is scheduled to commence. If the end of the 60 day period falls
`on a weekend or holiday, the period extends until the end ofthe next business day.”
`
`I
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`rescheduled to begin on November 27, 2017. (See Order No.»24.). However, the last day to file
`
`summary determination motions remained scheduled for October 3, 2017, less than 60 days
`
`'
`
`before the start of the rescheduled evidentiary hearing. (Id). The Private Parties’ request to
`
`move the last day to file summary detennination motions to September 28, 2017 would place this
`
`deadline in compliance with Commission Rule 210.18.
`
`For good cause shown, and because there is no opposition, the Private Parties’ Motion,
`
`Motion Docket No. 1044-037, is hereby granted.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`cNamara
`MaryJo
`A niinistrative Law Judge
`
`\
`
`Page2 of2'
`
`
`
`CERTAIN GRAPHICS SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS
`THEREOF, AND CONSUMER PRODUCTS CONTAINING
`THE SAME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1044
`,
`
`,
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached ORDER has been served by hand upon
`the Commission Investigative Attorney, Yoncha L. Kundupoglu, Esq., and the following parties
`as indicated, on September 22, 2017.
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`On Behalf of Comglainantsz
`
`Michael T. Renaud, Esq.
`MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY ANDPOPEO P.C.
`One Financial Center
`
`El Via Hand Delivery
`5 Via Express Dahvery
`» -
`-
`
`Boston, MA 02111
`
`%V1a First Class Mail
`Other:
`
`On Behalf of Respondents LG Electronics. Inc. LG
`Electronics. U.S.A.. Inc.. and LG Electronics M0bileC0mm
`-—U'.S.A., Inc.:'~
`
`'
`i
`SCOttE16ngOld
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`Mcpheison Building th
`901 15‘ Street NW, 7 Floor
`Washington,DC20005
`
`On Behalf of Respondents VIZIO, Inc.:
`
`Cono A. Carrano
`AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD, LLP
`RObCrt
`SIIBUSS
`1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW
`Washington,DC20036
`
`Cl Via Hand Delivery
`|:] Via Express Delivery
`'¥l.Via First Class Mail
`,
`Cl Other.
`iii
`
`CI Via Hand Delivery
`|:| Via Express Delivery
`-
`First Class
`%Othcr_
`'-ii
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTAIN GRAPHICS SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS
`THEREOF, AND CONSUMER PRODUCTS CONTAINING
`THE SAME
`
`I
`
`Inv, N0. 337-TA-1044
`
`'
`
`Certificate of Sen/ice —Page 2
`_
`On Behalf of Respondents MediaTek, Inc.. MediaTek USA
`Inc... and Sigma Designs. Inc.:
`
`Tyler T. VanHoutan
`MCGUIREWQQDSLLP
`
`~
`
`600 Travis Street, Suite 7500
`Houston, Texas 77002
`
`U Via Hand Delivery
`I1 Via Express Delivery
`
`’
`
`)2‘ Via First Class Mail
`other
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
