throbber
August 7, 2017
`
`Via Electronic Filing
`
`The Hon. Rhonda K. Schmidtlein, Chairman
`The Hon. David S. Johanson, Vice Chairman
`United States International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW
`Washington, DC. 20436
`
`Re:
`
`Sprint Corporation’s Statement on the Public Interest
`Certain Semiconductor Devices, Semiconductor Device Packages, and Products
`Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA~1010
`
`Dear Chairman Schmidtlein, Vice Chairman Johanson, and Commissioners:
`
`On behalf of Sprint Spectrum LP, I respectfully submit these comments in response to
`the Commission’s Notice of Request for Statements on the Public Interest in the matter
`of Certain Semiconductor Devices, Semiconductor Device Packages, and Products
`Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337—TA-101, dated July 10, 2017.
`
`Sprint is a leading telecommunications service provider and mobile network operator.
`Sprint has roughly 28,000 employees and has over 4,700 stores in the United States.
`With approximately $54 million customers as of March 2017, Sprint is currently the
`fourth—largest mobile network operator in the United States, behind Verizon, AT&T, and
`T—Mobile. 1
`
`Sprint is deeply concerned about the potential impact of an exclusion order on its
`business and its customers and on competition among mobile network operators
`generally. HTC (one of the respondents in this Investigation} has partnered with Sprint
`to provide its cutting—edge Androidhased “Bolt” smartphone exclusively to Sprint
`customers. Sprint’s strategic partnership with ETC to preside exclusive access to the
`Bolt smartphone helps distinguish Sprint from other mobile network operators and
`remain competitire,,2 Moreover, this partnership is about more than just providing an
`exclusive flagship phone: the ETC Bolt is specifically designed to take fol} advantage of
`Sprint’s LTE Plus network, which further sets Sprint apart from its competitors.
`
`i Sprints overall network reliability is on par with both Verizon and ATSET and
`outperforms T~Mohile based on an analysis of Nielsen data from the top 106
`metropolitan markets.
`
`2 See, e.g., htt
`
`
`
`511311 htes~hi
`
`remanenead eteom 201E}
`
`lieend~liolt~is~a~fast~
`
`
`
`

`

`The Hon. Rhonda K. Schmidtlein, Chairman
`The Hon. David S. Johanson, Vice Chairman
`
`August 7, 2017
`Page 2
`
`Sprint understands that the Administrative Law Judge (AM) in this Investigation has
`recommended an exclusion order and a cease and desist order relating to products
`containing accused semiconductor chips. An expansive remedial order such as the one
`the ALJ has recommended here poses significant repercussions to Sprint. If the
`Commission adopts the ALJ’s recommended remedy, Sprint is concerned that it will not
`be able to offer the Bolt smartphone to its customers The loss of this exclusive product
`could cost Sprint current and prospective customers by, among other things,
`compromising Sprint’s ability to showcase and market its LTE Plus network.
`*sae
`
`While Sprint expresses no opinion on the merits of the Investigation, we are deeply
`concerned about the impact a remedial order may have on our competitive standing and
`on our customers who would have fewer options when choosing a smartphone,
`particularly leading edge devices such as the Bolt. If the Commission determines a
`remedy of some kind is appropriate, we urge you to consider tailoring any remedial
`order to avoid disruption to Sprint’s ability to offer the Bolt (among other HTC
`smartphone products) to its customers, such as by delaying by six or more months the
`imposition of any remedy to allow HTC to qualify non-accused chips for its products.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Ryan Suilivan
`Vice President, Device Sevelopment & Engineering
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The Honorable Dee Lord
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E. Street SW, Room 317
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`I, Pamela A. Freitik, hereby certify that the attached document has been served upon the
`
`following parties as indicated below on August 7, 2017.
`
`☒ Via EDIS
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`Secretary to the Commission
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`☒ Via Hand Delivery
`500 E Street SW, Room 112-A
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`☐ Via EDIS
`Sidney A. Rosenzweig
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`Office of the General Counsel
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`500 E Street SW
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`sidney.rosenzweig@usitc.gov
`
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☒ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`edward.jou@usitc.gov
`
`☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Tessera-Broadcom@cov.com
` ☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Tessera-Broadcom@cov.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sturgis M. Sobin
`Shara Aranoff
`Daniel E. Valencia
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`
`
`Michael K. Plimack
`Dale A. Rice
`Nitin Subhedar
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One Front Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Robert T. Haslam
`Anupam Sharma
`Thomas E. Garten
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`333 Twin Dolphin Drive
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1418
`
`
`Counsel for Complainants Tessera Technologies,
`Inc., Tessera, Inc. and Invensas Corporation
`
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`David E. Sipiora
`Kristopher L. Reed
`Matthew C. Holohan
`Brian P. O’Donnell
`1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600
`Denver, CO 80202
`
`Joshua B. Pond
`607 14th Street, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, D.C. 20005-2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Norris P. Boothe
`Matthew J. Meyer
`William E. Mosley
`1080 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`
`
`
`FOSTER MURPHY ALTMAN & NICKEL PC
`David F. Nickel
`Matthew N. Duescher
`1899 L Street, N.W., Suite 1150
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`
`Counsel for Respondents Broadcom Limited,
`Broadcom Corporation, Arista Networks, Inc. ARRIS
`International plc, ARRIS Group, Inc., ARRIS
`Technology, Inc., ARRIS Enterprises LLC, ARRIS
`
`
`
`☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Tessera-Broadcom@cov.com
`
`
`
`☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Broadcom-
`TesseraITC@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
` ☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Broadcom-
`TesseraITC@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
` ☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Broadcom-
`TesseraITC@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
` ☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`FM-Broadcom-
`1010@fostermurphy.com
`
`
`

`

`Solutions, Inc. , Pace Ltd., Pace Americas, LLC, Pace
`USA, LLC, ASUSTeK Computer Inc., ASUS
`Computer International, Comcast Cable
`Communications, LLC, Comcast Cable
`Communications Management, LLC, Comcast
`Business Communications, LLC, Technicolor S.A.,
`Technicolor USA, Inc., Technicolor Connected Home
`USA LLC, NETGEAR, Inc., HTC Corporation and
`HTC America, Inc.
`
`David A. Hickerson
`George C. Beck
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 600
`Washington, D.C. 20007-5109
`
`
`Steven J. Rizzi
`Ramy E. Hanna
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10016-1314
`
`
`Counsel for Broadcom Limited
`and Broadcom Corporation
`
`
`
`
`☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Broadcom-Foley@Foley.com
` ☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Broadcom-Foley@Foley.com
`
`
`
`/s/ Pamela A. Freitik
`Pamela A. Freitik
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket