throbber
CableLo b5®
`{‘ohle lelevismn lflhOl’GlOlleS. Inr
`
`August 7, 2017
`
`Via Electronic Filing
`
`The Hon. Rhonda K. Schmidtlein, Chairman
`
`The Hon. David S. Johanson, Vice Chairman
`United States International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW
`
`Washington, DC. 20436
`
`Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.’s Statement on the Public Interest
`
`Certain Semiconductor Devices, Semiconductor Device Packages, and Products
`Containing the Same, Inv. No. 33 7-TA-1010
`
`Dear Chairman Schmidtlein, Vice Chairman Johanson, and Commissioners:
`
`On behalf of CableLabs, I respectfully submit these comments in response to the Commission’s
`Notice of Request for Statements on the Public Interest in the matter of Certain Semiconductor
`Devices, Semiconductor Device Packages, and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 33 7—TA—
`101, dated July 10, 2017.
`
`CableLabs is a non-profit research and development Lab founded in 1988 by members of the
`cable television industry. CableLabs” membership is comprised of the major cable operators
`worldwide, and includes most of the top cable operators in the U.S. See
`htLp:t/www.cablclabs.com/abuut-cahIclabs/membcr—companicsi. CableLabs also performs
`testing and certification of equipment manufactured for the cable industry (cg, DOCSIS cable
`modems).
`
`As a leader of the cable industry, CableLabs strongly urges the Commission to consider severe
`disruptions to legitimate trade and domestic operations, and the public welfare generally, that
`could result from any remedy in this Investigation.
`I understand Complainant Tessera has
`accused a broad swath of semiconductor components and products integrating such components
`in this Investigation, including products which implicate the cable and wireless industries
`(among others), such as cable set-top boxes, wireless modems, telecommunication switches,
`smart phones, and more.
`I further understand that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) presiding
`over this Investigation has recommended a sweeping exclusion order, a cease-and-desist order,
`and a maximum bond preventing the importation and/or sale of these products.
`
`An expansive remedial order such as the one the ALJ has recommended here poses significant
`repercussions to the cable industry. Broadcom, for example, is a world—leading chip supplier
`whose technologies are utilized in a wide range of consumer electronics, from cable set-top
`boxes, wireless modems, mobile phones, tablets, and even Virtual Reality technology
`(technologies offered by Broadcom’s co-Respondents, against whom the presiding ALI
`recommended an equally severe remedy). To suddenly exclude and ban the sale of Broadcom’s
`
`

`

`CableLob5®
`Cutile telewston lobomtones. Inc
`
`chips and the multitude of consumer products that carry them would deprive American
`consumers of access to fundamental technologies. This, in turn, will harm the industries that
`supply those technologies.
`
`As one example of the significant downstream impact of a broad remedial order, Respondent
`Broadcom is the sole supplier of chips for set-top boxes manufactured by co—Respondents
`ARRIS and Technicolor, who are themselves the suppliers of cable set—top boxes for co-
`Respondent Comcast, and a majority of the set-top boxes sold in the U.S. cable marketplace.
`Disruption to Comcast’s ability to supply cable set-top boxes could impact the ability of its
`roughly 22.5 million subscribers to access cable television and internet services. Moreover, even
`non—Comcast subscribers would suffer due to a less competitive marketplace, where other
`companies can limit choices and raise prices. The most recent Internet & Television Association
`statistics indicate that the U.S. cable industry, directly and indirectly, has a $421 billion
`economic impact, and supports 2.9 million U.S. jobs which represents $152 billion in personal
`income. '
`
`Finally, the severity of the currently recommended remedy causes CableLabs particular concern
`given Tessera’s non—practicing entity business model, and the effect on the public interest,
`particularly the cable industry. We understand Tessera does not manufacture products protected
`by its asserted patents, but rather seeks to profit from such manufacturers in the form of patent
`royalties. Indeed, we have learned Tessera did not even invent the patent that underlies the
`currently recommended remedy (a patent that expires next year)—it bought the patent and has
`now asserted it against these respondent manufacturers. Other branches of the U.S. government
`are taking a closer look at such entities, and the appropriate relief that they should be afforded.2
`Also of concern, we understand Tessera’s patented technology has been found trivial in the
`context of the technology of a semiconductor chip; even more so in the context of a downstream
`product incorporating such a chip. Careful consideration of any remedy in this investigation is
`surely warranted.
`
`While CableLabs expresses no opinion on the merits of the Investigation, we are deeply
`concerned about the impact a remedial order may have on the cable industry. If the Commission
`determines a remedy of some kind is appropriate, I urge you to consider tailoring any remedial
`order to avoid the immediate disruption to the cable and other large industries, and to the lives of
`the millions of Americans who will be affected. In particular, we have been informed the
`Respondents here will not know until the day the Commission issues its final decision and any
`remedial orders whether the infringement finding on the current products will be upheld and thus
`whether it is necessary to alter those products. And, even after altering such products, many of
`the products would need to be re-Certified by CableLabs (e.g., DOCSIS cable modems)—a
`process that can take 3-5 months. Thus, please consider whether any Commission remedy
`
`1 https://www.ncta.com/impact
`2 See, e.g., HR. 2189, “Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act”, available at
`
`l11i)S://WWW.COI‘I lrcss. iow’billll lSlh—con 'rcss/housc—bill/2189, seeking to bar non-practicing
`
`

`

`(ZolebleLobs®
`(Sable lelevusiou latmmlnnes Inc
`
`should include a grace period for those companies to alter their products to fall outside the scope
`of any infringement of the asserted patents, and Certify them at CableLabs.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`/,,
`
`1/
`
`v
`
`/’ L
`
`I
`A Judson D. Cary
`Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. (CableLabs)
`Vice President, Deputy General Counsel
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The Honorable Dee Lord
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E. Street SW, Room 317
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`I, Pamela A. Freitik, hereby certify that the attached document has been served upon the
`
`following parties as indicated below on August 7, 2017.
`
`☒ Via EDIS
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`Secretary to the Commission
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`☒ Via Hand Delivery
`500 E Street SW, Room 112-A
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`☐ Via EDIS
`Sidney A. Rosenzweig
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`Office of the General Counsel
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`500 E Street SW
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`sidney.rosenzweig@usitc.gov
`
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☒ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`edward.jou@usitc.gov
`
`☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Tessera-Broadcom@cov.com
` ☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Tessera-Broadcom@cov.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sturgis M. Sobin
`Shara Aranoff
`Daniel E. Valencia
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`
`
`Michael K. Plimack
`Dale A. Rice
`Nitin Subhedar
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One Front Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Robert T. Haslam
`Anupam Sharma
`Thomas E. Garten
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`333 Twin Dolphin Drive
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1418
`
`
`Counsel for Complainants Tessera Technologies,
`Inc., Tessera, Inc. and Invensas Corporation
`
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`David E. Sipiora
`Kristopher L. Reed
`Matthew C. Holohan
`Brian P. O’Donnell
`1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600
`Denver, CO 80202
`
`Joshua B. Pond
`607 14th Street, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, D.C. 20005-2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Norris P. Boothe
`Matthew J. Meyer
`William E. Mosley
`1080 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`
`
`
`FOSTER MURPHY ALTMAN & NICKEL PC
`David F. Nickel
`Matthew N. Duescher
`1899 L Street, N.W., Suite 1150
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`
`Counsel for Respondents Broadcom Limited,
`Broadcom Corporation, Arista Networks, Inc. ARRIS
`International plc, ARRIS Group, Inc., ARRIS
`Technology, Inc., ARRIS Enterprises LLC, ARRIS
`
`
`
`☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Tessera-Broadcom@cov.com
`
`
`
`☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Broadcom-
`TesseraITC@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
` ☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Broadcom-
`TesseraITC@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
` ☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Broadcom-
`TesseraITC@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
` ☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`FM-Broadcom-
`1010@fostermurphy.com
`
`
`

`

`Solutions, Inc. , Pace Ltd., Pace Americas, LLC, Pace
`USA, LLC, ASUSTeK Computer Inc., ASUS
`Computer International, Comcast Cable
`Communications, LLC, Comcast Cable
`Communications Management, LLC, Comcast
`Business Communications, LLC, Technicolor S.A.,
`Technicolor USA, Inc., Technicolor Connected Home
`USA LLC, NETGEAR, Inc., HTC Corporation and
`HTC America, Inc.
`
`David A. Hickerson
`George C. Beck
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 600
`Washington, D.C. 20007-5109
`
`
`Steven J. Rizzi
`Ramy E. Hanna
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10016-1314
`
`
`Counsel for Broadcom Limited
`and Broadcom Corporation
`
`
`
`
`☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Broadcom-Foley@Foley.com
` ☐ Via EDIS
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☒ Via Electronic Mail at
`Broadcom-Foley@Foley.com
`
`
`
`/s/ Pamela A. Freitik
`Pamela A. Freitik
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket