throbber
State Court of Fulton County
`**E-FILED**
`18EV000905
`11/14/2018 3:36 PM
`LeNora Ponzo, Clerk
`Civil Division
`
`IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY
`STATE OF GEORGIA
`
`Civil Action File
`No. 13EV000905Y
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`RENE ARTURO VENTURA and
`REINA GUTIERREZ,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`MARCIA NURSE PLATT,
`
`Defendant.
`DEFENDANT’S PORTION 0F THE PRE-TRIAL ORDER
`The following constitutes defendant Marcia Nurse Platt’s portion of the Pre-Trial Order:
`The name, address and phone number of the attorneys who will conduct the
`
`1.
`
`trial are as follows:
`
`Attorney for Plaintiffs:
`
`David T. Lashgari, Esq.
`Georgia Bar No. 438517
`Lashgari & Associates, P.C.
`2470 Windy Hill Road
`Suite 214
`Marietta, GA 30067-8617
`(770) 612-9400
`
`Attorney for Defendant:
`
`Daniel C. Prout, Jr.
`Georgia Bar No. 588753
`Travis J. Meyer
`Georgia Bar No. 309781
`Waldon Adelman Castilla Hiestand & Prout
`900 Circle 75 Parkway
`Suite 1040
`Atlanta, Georgia 30339
`(770) 953-1710
`The estimated time required for trial is three to four (3—4) days.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`There are no motions or other matters pending for consideration by the Court
`except as follows: Defendant has filed Motions in Limine which should not in any way delay
`
`

`

`the trial of this case. In addition, defendant reserves the right to file motions to compel non-
`
`parties to produce documents which were requested pursuant to O.C.G.A. §9-1 1-34. Defendant
`
`requested a continuance based on an agreement to extend discovery between the parties which
`was subsequently rescinded by plaintiffs’ counsel. Further, defendant also points out that the
`current Consent Case Management Order states this case will not be called to trial until January
`
`22, 2019.
`
`4.
`
`The jury will be qualified as to the relationship with the following: The parties,
`plaintiffs’ counsel and his law firm. The defendant obj ects to qualifying the members of the
`
`jury pool as to their relationship with her attorneys as they do not have a financial stake in the
`outcome of this case.
`
`5.
`
`All discovery has n_ot been completed. Plaintiff supplemented his
`(a)
`discovery reSponses with additional MRI reports. Defendant has requested those images and
`repons from the provider directly. Defendant has not received that response to date. Further,
`defendant has identified an expert who will need to review the newly identified MRI images/
`reports. Defendant will need to obtain a new evidentiary deposition of her expert based on the
`newly produced MRI reports.
`
`The parties shall be permitted to take depositions of any person(s) for the preservation of
`evidence for use at trial. Further, the parties shall have the right to take the discovery
`deposition(s) of any Opposing expert(s) who will testify at trial. Each party shall notify the
`opposing party of his/her intent to introduce “live” expert testimony at trial within a reasonable
`time prior to trial, so that the opposing party will have ample time to secure the discovery
`deposition of that expert and to retain his/her own rebuttal expert(s). In addition, the parties
`
`reserve the right to file motions to compel non—parties to produce documents which were
`
`

`

`requested pursuant to O.C.G.A. §9-1 1-34.
`
`(b)
`
`The names of the parties as shown in the caption to this Order are correct
`
`and complete and there is no question by any party as to the misj cinder or non-joinder of any
`
`parties.
`
`6.
`
`The following is the plaintiff’s brief and succinct outline of the case and
`
`contentions: (to be supplied by plaintiff).
`
`7.
`
`The following is the defendant’s brief and succinct outline ofthe case and
`contentions: On December 8, 2012, plaintiff Rene Ventura was traveling on Northridge Road
`toward its intersection with Dunwoody Place. Ms. Platt was traveling directly behind plaintiff
`Ventura. Ms. Platt’s vehicle made contact with the rear of plaintiff Ventura’s vehicle. Plaintiff
`
`Reina Gutierrez was not involved in the accident.
`
`Ms. Platt is not responsible for any pre-existing or subsequent injury or illness which is
`
`not directly related to the accident. The burden of proof is upon the plaintiffs to prove causation
`
`of their injuries and damages.
`
`8.
`
`The issues for determination by the jury are as follows: Proximate cause and
`
`damages.
`
`9.
`
`Specifications of negligence including applicable code sections are as follows: (to
`
`be completed by plaintiff).
`
`10.
`
`If the case is based on a contract, either oral or written, the terms of the contract
`
`are as follow: Not applicable.
`
`11.
`
`The types of damages and the applicable measure of those damages are stated as
`
`follows: Plaintiff Rene Ventura has provided documentation for medical expenses of $84,638.34
`
`and $5,071.00 in lost wages. Plaintiff Reina Gutierrez is asserting an unspecified claim for loss
`
`

`

`of consortium. She had failed to produce any documentary evidence to support her claim.
`
`Defendant objects to the presentation of any evidence, testimony, documentation, or argument
`
`concerning any special damages which were not disclosed during the course of discovery and
`
`specifically pled in accordance with O.C.G.A. §9—1 1-9(g).
`
`12.
`
`If the case involves divorce, each party shall present to the court at the pre-trial
`
`conference the affidavits required by Rule 24.2. Not applicable.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`The following facts are stipulated: Defendant admits fault for the accident.
`
`The following is a list of all documentary and physical evidence that may be
`
`tendered at the trial by the parties. Unless noted, the parties have stipulated as to the authenticity
`
`of the documents listed and the exhibits listed may be admitted without further proof of
`
`authenticity. A11 exhibits shall be marked by counsel prior to trial so as not to delay the trial
`
`before the jury.
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`By the Plaintiff: (to be supplied by plaintiff).
`By the Defendant:
`
`Defendant, at the discretion of his attorneys, m_ay tender:
`Any of the plaintiff” s healthcare records or bills, including, but not limited to, the
`
`1)
`
`records or bills of the following: Health First Chiropractic Center, Inc.; Luis
`Naranjo, D.C.; Altergyn, LLC; James Granger, M.D.; OMI Diagnostics;
`Orthopedic & Spine Specialists of Georgia; Miguel Jimenez, M.D.; Choice One
`Physical Therapy; Wellstar Cobb Hospital; MRI & Imaging of Georgia; Nick A.
`DeFilippis, PhD; Advanta Total Health; Richard Schuyler, D.C.; Thomas
`
`Federico, M.D.; Walgreens pharmacy; Northside Imaging; American Health
`
`Imaging; Adult Medicine of Marietta, P.C.; Take Care Health Georgia, P.C.;
`
`

`

`Kaiser Permanente — West Cobb Medical Center; Kaiser Permanente —
`
`Cumberland Medical Center; Philip Batista, M.D.; and Atlanta Psychological
`
`Associates;
`
`Any document necessary for purposes of impeachment, cross-examination or
`
`rebuttal;
`
`Any documents identified by the plaintiff in their portion of the Pre-Trial Order;
`The police accident report;
`
`Photographs, repair estimates, or videos of the involved vehicles, persons, and
`
`accident scene;
`
`Previous accident photographs of plaintiff’s vehicle;
`
`Any records of any of the plaintiff’s employers including, but not limited to, the
`
`records of Pappadeaux Seafood Kitchen; Pappas Restaurants, Inc.;
`
`Any records of the following insurers including but not limited to, State Farm;
`
`Kaiser Health Plan of Georgia, Inc.; ;
`Any diagnostic studies, including, but not limited to, MRI, CT and x-ray films;
`EEG results;
`Any medical narratives identified by the defendant in accordance with O.C.G.A.
`
`§24—3-18 and/or O.C.G.A. §24-8-826;
`
`Any pleadings, discovery, and depositions from this case;
`Any document pertaining to any prior/subsequent accidents, injuries, claims, or
`
`lawsuits;
`
`Any of the plaintiff‘s cellular phone records, including but not limited to T-
`Mobile USA, Inc.;
`
`2)
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`5)
`
`6)
`
`7)
`
`7)
`
`8)
`
`9)
`
`10)
`
`11)
`
`12)
`
`

`

`13)
`
`Any criminal convictions of the plaintiffs;
`
`14)
`
`15)
`
`Any records from plaintiffs’ fitness facilities;
`Any repair documents or material from Toyota South; and
`Any records presented pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 24-8-803(6) and 24-9-902(1 1).
`Defendant reserves her objections as to authenticity of documents and exhibits tendered
`
`16)
`
`by the plaintiff until afier her counsel has had a chance to review and examine such documents
`
`and exhibits. In addition, the defendant reserves her objections to the admissibility of any
`documents listed by the plaintiff until they are tendered into evidence. Defendant has previously
`made all records received pursuant to requests for production of documents to non-parties
`
`available for plaintiff’s inspection. Finally, the defendant reserves the right to supplement and/or
`amend this list prior to trial.
`
`15.
`
`Special authorities relied upon by the plaintiff relating to peculiar evidentiary or
`
`other legal questions are as follows: (to be completed by plaintiff).
`
`16.
`
`Special authorities relied upon by the defendant relating to peculiar evidentiary or
`
`other legal questions are as follows: The plaintiff is not entitled to recover any special damages
`which were not specifically pled in accordance with O.C.G.A. § 9-1 1-9(g).
`
`l7.
`
`All requests to charge anticipated at the time of trial will be filed in accordance
`
`with Rule 10.3.
`
`18.
`
`The testimony 0f the following person(s) may be introduced by depositions: Any
`healthcare provider who has treated or examined the plaintiff or interpreted any diagnostic tests;
`Serge Ouanounou, M.D.; any persons listed in paragraph No. 19 who are unavailable at the time
`
`of trial.
`
`

`

`Any objection to the depositions or questions or arguments in the depositions shall be
`
`called to the attention of the Court prior to trial.
`
`l9.
`
`The following are lists of witnesses the
`
`Plaintiffm have present at trial: (to be completed by plaintiff).
`Plaintiffm have present at trial: (to be completed by plaintiff).
`Defendant w_i11 have present at trial: No one.
`Defendant my have present at trial: Marcia Nurse Platt; Officer M. S.
`Stark; Serge Ouanounou, M.D.; any healthcare provider, before or after the accident, who treated
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`the plaintiff or interpreted diagnostic tests, including, but not limited to, those persons or entities
`
`listed in paragraph l4(b)(1); any representative of the plaintiff‘s employers, including but not
`
`limited to, those listed in paragraph l4(b)(6); any representative of those insurers listed in
`
`paragraph l4(b)(7); any representative of the plaintiff’s cellular phone providers; any records
`
`custodian needed for purposes of authenticity; any witness for rebuttal, cross-examination, or
`
`impeachment including but not limited to, all persons listed in the parties’ portions of the Pre-
`
`Trial Order; any person identified in the parties’ portions of the Pre-Trial Order.
`
`Defendant objects to any witnesses listed by the plaintiff who were not previously
`
`identified in response to discovery requests which called for their identification.
`
`Defendant reserves the right to supplement and/or amend this portion of the Pre-Trial
`
`Order with proper notice to the Court and the plaintiff.
`
`Opposing counsel may rely on representation by the other party that he or she will have a
`
`witness present unless notice to the contrary is given in sufficient time prior to trial to allow the
`
`other party to subpoena the witness or obtain his testimony by other means.
`
`

`

`20.
`
`21.
`
`The form of all possible verdicts to be considered by the jury are as follows:
`We the jury find in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $
`We the jury find in favor of defendant Marcia Nurse Platt.
`The possibilities of settling the case are fair.
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(C)
`
`(d)
`
`The parties do want the case reported.
`
`The cost of takedown will be shared.
`
`Other matters: Defendant requests a jury of twelve (12) persons.
`
`Defendant objects to any medical narratives the plaintiffs intend to introduce during the trial of
`
`this case for failure to comply with O.C.G.A. § 24-8-826. Daniel C. Prout, Jr. has a leave of
`absence for November 26, 201 8 through and including November 28, 201 8. Further, defendant
`
`reserves the right object to any portions of plaintiffs’ pretrial order as they have not yet provided
`
`a copy for review and consolidation.
`
`This I'Ifiof ”WM ,2018.
`
`WALDON ADELMAN CASTILLA
`HIESTAND & PROUT
`
`Daniel C. Prout, Jr.
`Georgia Bar No. 588753
`Travis J. Meyer
`Georgia Bar No. 309781
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`900 Circle 75 Parkway
`Suite 1040
`Atlanta, Georgia 30339
`(770) 953-1710
`
`

`

`IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY
`STATE OF GEORGIA
`
`Civil Action File
`No. 18EV000905Y
`
`EHw
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`) O
`
`RENE ARTURO VENTURA and
`REINA GUTIERREZ,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`MARCIA NURSE PLATT,
`
`Defendant.
`
`It is hereby ordered that the foregoing, including the attachments thereto, constitutes the
`PRETRIAL ORDER in the above case and supersedes the pleadings which may not be further
`amended except by order of the court to prevent manifest injustice or as otherwise provided
`
`herein.
`
`This
`
`day of
`
`, 201 8.
`
`Judge Fred C. Eady
`State Court of Fulton County
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`This is to certify that I have this day served opposing counsel to this action with a copy of
`the foregoing PLEADING by depositing a copy of same in the United States Mail in an envelope
`with adequate postage affixed thereon, properly addressed as follows:
`
`David T. Lashgari, Esq.
`Lashgari & Associates, P.C.
`2470 Windy Hill Road
`Suite 214
`Marietta, GA 30067-8617
`
`fdayof ”WM ,2018.
`
`WALDON ADELMAN CASTILLA
`HIESTAND & PROUT
`
`This
`
`Daniel C. Prout, Jr.
`Georgia Bar No. 588753
`Travis J. Meyer
`Georgia Bar No. 309781
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`900 Circle 75 Parkway
`Suite 1040
`Atlanta, Georgia 30339
`(770) 953-1710
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket