throbber
State Court of Fulton County
`**E-FILED**
`17EV005614
`11/26/2019 3:05 PM
`
`LeNora Ponzo, Clerk
`Civil Division
`
`IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY
`
`STATE OF GEORGIA
`
`ASPIRE AT WEST MIDTOWN
`
`APARTMENTS, LP,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`NORSOUTH CONSTRUCTION
`
`COMPANY OF GEORGIA, INC.,
`
`HARRIS VENTURES, INC. d/b/a
`
`STAFF ZONE, and FIBERLOCK
`
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC. n/k/a ICP
`
`CONSTRUCTION, INC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`VVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
`
`CIVIL ACTION FILE
`
`NO. l7-EV—0056l4
`
`AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
`
`Pursuant to Judge Edlein’s Standing Order in E—File Cases, the parties conducted
`
`an early planning conference on June 27, 2019 with the following counsel (and/or pro se
`
`parties) in attendance:1
`
`Party
`
`Aspire at West Midtown Apartments, LP
`
`NorSouth Construction Company of
`Georgia, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`Counsel
`
`R. Daniel Douglass
`Stites & Harbison, PLLC
`2800 SunTrust Plaza
`
`303 Peachtree Street NE
`
`Atlanta, Georgia 30308
`Phone: 404—739-8807
`
`ddouglassga) stitescorn
`
`Ryan B. Wilhelm
`Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
`1180 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2900
`
`Atlanta, Georgia 30309
`Phone: 404-348-8584
`
`Ryan.WilhelmgaDlewisbrisbois.com
`and
`
`1 Please also provide those parties (with answers on file) who failed to attend the early
`planning conference.
`
`473 944:4 :ATLANTA
`
`

`

`Harris Ventures, Inc. d/b/a Staff Zone
`
`Fiberlock Technologies,
`Construction, Inc.
`
`Inc. n/k/a lCP
`
`L. Bruce Stout
`
`Attorney at Law
`7130 Cedar Knoll Drive
`
`Gainesville, Georgia 30506
`Phone: 404-932-3263
`
`bstoutgw;stoutlawatl.com
`
`Robert S. Thompson, Esq.
`Hawkins, Parnell Thackston & Young, LLP
`303 Peachtree Street, Suite 4000
`Atlanta, Georgia 30308—3243
`Phone: 404-614-7522
`
`rthompsongwhptylawcom
`Leslie K. Eason
`
`Steven Flynn
`Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP
`55 Ivan Allen Junior Boulevard, NW
`Suite 750
`
`Atlanta, GA 30308
`
`leasongQgrsmcom
`s'fl
`rsm.com
`
`Parties not in attendance: None.
`
`The parties having conferred in an effort to settle the case, discuss discovery, limit
`
`issues, and discuss other matters addressed by this Amended Case Management Order
`
`(“CMO”),
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`limited to, written discovery,
`0 DISCOVERY (including, but not
`depositions, and any expert discovery) commenced on February 9, 2018
`pursuant
`to USCR 5.1
`and shall close on September 30, 2020.
`[Guidelinez
`Personal
`Injury — 6 months; Complex Personal
`Injury
`(including Wrongful Death) — 12 months; Medical Malpractice — 12
`months; Complex Medical Malpractice (including Wrongful Death) — 18
`months; Contract — 6 months; Complex Contract — 12 months; Other — 6
`months (12 months if Complex)] Basis for any departure from the
`.
`.
`.
`.
`2
`guideline or for “complex” deSIgnation:
`
`
`
`2 Complex cases involve large number of parties, large number of claims and defenses,
`highly technical and exceptionally complex issues and proof, multiple experts, greater
`
`473 944:4 :ATLANTA
`
`

`

`This is a complex construction defect case involving standard of care
`issues and causation issues requiring expert testimony, insurance coverage
`questions that may require expert testimony, large dollar damages that
`may require expert
`testimony, numerous fact witness depositions and
`joinder of additional parties as defendants.
`The parties anticipate
`completing additional document production and fact witness depositions
`prior
`to expert discovery to the extent possible.
`The parties are
`coordinating discovery with a related insurance coverage lawsuit recently
`filed.
`
`- EXPERT DISCOVERY (if applicable): All expert discovery must be
`completed by the above discove1_'y deadline. The plaintiff(s) and third—
`party plaintiff(s) shall identify experts that are expected to testify at trial
`no later than June 4, 2020. Discovery depositions of all experts identified
`by the plaintiff(s) shall be completed no later than July 15, 2020. The
`defendant(s) shall identify experts that are expected to testify at trial no
`later than August 15, 2020. Discovery depositions of all experts identified
`by the defendant(s) shall be completed no later than September 15, 2020.
`The parties shall disclose any rebuttal experts within 45 days of the
`conclusion of the deposition of the expert to be rebutted, but no later than
`August 31, 2020, and shall make any rebuttal experts available for
`deposition no later than September 15, 2020.
`
`through the Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution
`0 MEDIATION,
`(ADR) of the Fulton County Courts (404.612.4549) or private mediator
`mutually agreed upon by the parties, shall be completed no later than 15
`days after the close of discovery, October 15, 2020.3 All parties are to
`participate in this mediation and make a good faith effort to resolve the
`issues involved in this case.
`In the event that the named parties and
`counsel do not have full settlement authority, those entities who do have
`authority shall attend the mediation along with parties and counsel.
`
`- DISPOSITIVE and/or RULE 702 MOTIONS shall be filed no later than
`
`thirty (30) days after the close of discovery. Prior to filing any Rule 702
`motion, the parties shall meet and confer in a good faith effort to resolve
`the evidentiary issue(s).
`
`
`
`than normal amount of documents and evidence (including electronically—stored
`information), problems locating and preserving documents and evidence (including
`electronically-stored information), and extensive discovery outside the State of Georgia.
`
`to a Judicially—Hosted Settlement
`the parties may request a referral
`3 Alternatively,
`Conference. Such request shall be directed to the Court’s Staff Attorney no later than
`ninety (90) days prior to the mediation deadline set by the CMO and shall set forth the
`reasons for the request.
`
`473944:4:ATLANTA
`
`

`

`TRIAL BY JURY shall be set by placement on the Court’s Civil Jury
`Trial calendar approximately sixty (60) days after the close of discovery
`(if no motions pending) or on the next civil trial calendar after the Court’s
`order on any dispositive and/or Rule 702 motions. To request a special
`setting, the parties shall contact the Court’s Staff Attorney and state the
`basis for the request no later than the close of discovery.
`
`IT IS
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that
`
`the
`
`following PRACTICES
`
`and
`
`PROCEDURES govern this litigation:
`
`DISCOVERY DISPUTES — in addition to the obligations set forth by
`USCR 6.4(B), the parties shall meet and confer in person or by telephone
`in a good faith effort to resolve any discovery disputes and, in the event
`the parties are unable to resolve the disputes, contact the Court’s Staff
`Attorney to request a telephonic hearing with the Court, prior to filing any
`discovery motion.
`The Court will schedule a telephonic hearing,
`if
`appropriate, or instruct the parties to brief the matter.
`
`WITNESSES — the parties shall supplement the identification of witnesses
`(except for purposes of impeachment),
`in response to any applicable
`discovery request, no later than fifteen (15) days after the close of
`discovery.
`Failure to do so, absent extraordinary circumstances, will
`result in the exclusion of the unidentified or late-identified witness.
`
`COMMUNICATION WITH THE COURT — the parties may contact the
`Court’s Staff Attorney, Lisa Liang, at Lisa.Lianggdlfultoncountyga.gov, to
`inquire regarding any procedural
`issue (scheduling, case status, Court
`requirements, etc.) and/or to arrange a status conference or hearing.
`Unless instructed by the Court, the parties shall not submit letter briefs
`(including substantive emails addressing the merits) or “carbon copy” the
`Court on correspondence between the parties and addressing the merits.
`
`PROPOSED ORDERS and COURTESY COPIES — the parties shall e—file
`proposed orders and any courtesy copies of proposed orders (if requested)
`shall be emailed to the Court’s Staff Attorney in Word format. The parties
`are discouraged from submitting courtesy copies of briefs to the Court,
`unless specifically requested. The parties, however, may contact the
`Court’s Staff Attorney regarding any consent/joint filings or other filings
`necessitating prompt action by the Court.
`
`e—file
`ORIGINAL DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS — the parties shall
`scanned copies in lieu of original deposition transcripts and retain original
`deposition transcripts until specifically requested by the Court or trial.
`
`MFailure to comply with this CMO may result in sanctions, including striking of
`pleadings, imposition of attorneys’ fees, and exclusion of Witnesses and evidence.
`
`473 944:4 :ATLANTA
`
`

`

`Except for EXTRAORDINARY cause shown and by Order of this Court,
`deadlines set forth by this CMO shall not be amended.
`
`the
`
`This 26th day of November, 2019.
`
`/s/Susan E. Edlein
`
`Susan E. Edlein
`
`Judge, State Court of Fulton County
`
`Submitted by:
`
`R. Daniel Douglass
`GA Bar No. 227490
`
`STITES & HARBISON, PLLC
`2800 SunTrust Plaza
`
`303 Peachtree Street NE
`
`Atlanta, GA 30308
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`473944:4:ATLANTA
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket