throbber
Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 1 of 4
`
`United States District Court
`for the
`Southern District of Florida
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 22-22706-Civ-Scola
`
`
`)
`Bell Northern Research, LLC,
`)
`Plaintiff,
`)
`
`)
`v.
`)
`
`)
`HMD America, Inc., and others,
`)
`Defendants.
`Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and
`Order Referring Discovery Matters to the Magistrate Judge
`This matter is before the Court upon an independent review of the record.
`
`It is ordered and adjudged as follows:
`1. The Plaintiff must forward a copy of this Order to every Defendant
`immediately upon the filing of a response to the complaint by a Defendant in this
`case. If a Defendant has removed this action from state court, the removing
`Defendant must immediately forward a copy of this Order to every party who has
`made an appearance in the state court action. Any party with a pending motion
`in the state-court action must separately refile the motion in this Court or the
`Court will not consider the motion.
`2. Within 21 days of the filing of a response to the complaint by a Defendant
`in this matter, the parties must meet and confer regarding discovery and
`scheduling issues, as set out in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and Local
`Rule 16.1(b). If this case was removed from state court, the parties’ discovery
`and scheduling conference must occur within 21 days of this Order.
`3. Within 14 days of the parties’ discovery-and-scheduling conference, the
`parties must file a joint-discovery-plan-and-conference report, as set forth in
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)(3) and Local Rule 16.1(b)(2).
`4. The parties are ordered to disregard the requirements of Local Rule
`16.1 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)(3)(B) regarding any proposed
`deadlines or dates certain. Instead, the parties are to direct their attention to
`the scheduling timelines set forth in Attachments “A” and “B” to this Order. The
`schedule set forth in Attachment “A” will be used if the parties believe the case is
`straight-forward and may benefit from an expedited scheduling track. In most
`other cases, the standard scheduling track in Attachment “B” will be used. The
`parties are therefore directed to advise the Court whether they would prefer to be
`assigned to the expedited (Attachment “A”) or to the standard (Attachment “B”)
`track. If the parties believe that they have good reason to depart from either of
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 2 of 4
`
`these two tracks, or if the parties believe that this case is uniquely complex and
`requires significantly more time (as described in Local Rule 16.1(2)(C)), the
`parties must set out the reasons justifying a more protracted schedule along
`with a proposed schedule. Any such proposed schedule must be submitted in
`substantially the same format as the schedules presented in the Attachments to
`this Order with all proposed date or event deviations italicized. Regardless of any
`proposed changes, the dispositive motions deadline must be set no later than
`four months before the commencement of the proposed trial period and no
`sooner than two weeks after the close of all fact discovery. Any failure to
`comply with the directions in this paragraph may result in the Court
`unilaterally setting the deadlines itself.
`5. General Motion Practice Before the District Judge. Where there are
`multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants, the parties must file joint motions* and
`consolidated responses and replies unless there are clear conflicts of position.
`If conflicts of position exist, the parties must explain the conflicts in their
`separate filings.
`6. Magistrate Judge Referral. By virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate
`Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the Court refers all
`discovery matters in this case to United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan
`Goodman to take all necessary and proper action as required by law.
`7. Settlement Conference Before Magistrate Judge. The parties may, at any
`time, file a motion requesting a settlement conference before Judge Goodman.
`The Court encourages the parties to consider a confidential settlement
`conference with Judge Goodman, especially if the parties believe there is a
`meaningful chance of reaching an early, amicable resolution of their dispute.
`8. Discovery Motion Procedures. Judge Goodman will enter a separate order
`regarding his discovery procedures.
`Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on August 26, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* If multiple Defendants have been served on different days, their deadlines to respond to the
`complaint will likely differ. Therefore, in order to file a joint motion to dismiss the complaint, for
`example, one or more Defendants may need an extension of time to respond to the complaint. To
`that end, those Defendants must confer with opposing counsel, as required by the Local Rules,
`and then seek relief from the Court regarding an appropriate extension. So long as the disparate
`service dates do not result in extensions that will unduly delay the proceedings, the Court will
`accommodate any request that facilitates the joint filing. If any Defendant has not yet been
`served by the time a responsive pleading is due, the parties must advise the Court as to whether
`further extensions may be warranted.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________
`Robert N. Scola, Jr.
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 3 of 4
`
`Attachment “A”: Example Scheduling Timeline for Expedited Track Cases
`
`weeks after
`entry of the
`scheduling
`order
`4 weeks
`
`9 weeks
`
`14 weeks
`
`
`
`Deadline to join additional parties or to amend pleadings.
`
`Deadline to file joint interim status report.
`Deadline to file Proposed Order Scheduling Mediation, setting forth
`the name of the mediator, and the date, time, and location of the
`mediation, consistent with the Order of Referral to Mediation (which
`immediately follows this scheduling order).
`
`Deadline to complete all fact discovery.
`Deadline to submit joint notice indicating whether the parties consent
`to jurisdiction before the designated magistrate judge for purposes of
`final disposition.
`Deadline to exchange expert witness summaries/reports pursuant to
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). Rebuttal disclosures are
`permitted and must conform to the deadline set forth in Federal Rule
`of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(D)(ii).
`
`16 weeks
`
`Deadline for the filing of all dispositive motions.
`
`18 weeks
`
`Deadline to complete mediation, consistent with the Order of Referral
`to Mediation (which immediately follows this scheduling order).
`
`21 weeks
`8 weeks
`BEFORE
`calendar call
`4 weeks
`BEFORE the
`trial date
`
`Deadline to complete all expert discovery.
`
`Deadline for the filing of pretrial motions, including motions in limine
`and Daubert motions.
`
`Deadline to file joint pretrial stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(e)
`and pretrial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`26(a)(3).
`
`2 weeks
`Deadline to file proposed jury instructions (if the matter is set for a
`BEFORE the
`jury trial) or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (if the
`trial date
`matter is set for a bench trial) pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(k).
`33 weeks
`(approximate) Two-week trial period commences (calendar call will be scheduled on
`the Tuesday before the trial period)
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 4 of 4
`
`Attachment “B”: Example Scheduling Timeline for Standard Track Cases
`
`weeks after
`entry of the
`scheduling
`order
`5 weeks
`
`
`
`Deadline to join additional parties or to amend pleadings.
`
`14 weeks
`
`Deadline to file joint interim status report.
`
`25 weeks
`
`Deadline to file Proposed Order Scheduling Mediation, setting
`forth the name of the mediator, and the date, time, and location
`of the mediation, consistent with the Order of Referral to
`Mediation (which immediately follows this scheduling order).
`
`31 weeks
`
`Deadline to complete all fact discovery.
`Deadline to submit joint notice indicating whether the parties
`consent to jurisdiction before the designated magistrate judge for
`purposes of final disposition.
`Deadline to exchange expert witness summaries/reports
`pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). Rebuttal
`disclosures are permitted and must conform to the deadline set
`forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(D)(ii).
`
`33 weeks
`
`Deadline for the filing of all dispositive motions.
`
`35 weeks
`
`40 weeks
`8 weeks
`BEFORE
`calendar call
`4 weeks
`BEFORE the
`trial date
`
`Deadline to complete mediation, consistent with the Order of
`Referral to Mediation (which immediately follows this scheduling
`order).
`
`Deadline to complete all expert discovery.
`
`Deadline for the filing of pretrial motions, including motions in
`limine and Daubert motions.
`
`Deadline to file joint pretrial stipulation pursuant to Local Rule
`16.1(e) and pretrial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
`Procedure 26(a)(3).
`
`2 weeks
`Deadline to file proposed jury instructions (if the matter is set for
`BEFORE the
`a jury trial) or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (if
`trial date
`the matter is set for a bench trial) pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(k).
`49 weeks
`(approximate) Two-week trial period commences (calendar call will be scheduled
`on the Tuesday before the trial period)
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket