`
`United States District Court
`for the
`Southern District of Florida
`
`
`Bell Northern Research, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HMD America, Inc., and others,
`Respondents.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Civil Action No. 22-22706-Civ-Scola
`
`Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report And Recommendations
`This order concerns two motions referred to United States Magistrate
`Judge Jonathan Goodman for a report and recommendations. This Court
`referred Defendant Hon Hai Industry Co., Ltd.’s motion for exceptional case
`status (ECF No. 163) to Judge Goodman on April 10, 2023. (ECF No. 165.)
`Judge Goodman issued a report, recommending that the Court deny the
`motion. (Report of Magistrate, ECF No. 236.) Defendant Hon Hai Industry Co.,
`Ltd. has not filed objections to the report, and the time to do so has passed.
`This Court also referred Defendants HMD America, Inc., HMD Global Oy,
`Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores L.P., Target Corp., and Walmart Inc.’s
`motion to sever and stay (ECF No. 232) to Judge Goodman on November 8,
`2023. (ECF No. 245.) Judge Goodman issued a report, recommending that the
`Court deny the motion. (Report of Magistrate, ECF No. 250.) The Defendants
`have not filed objections, and the time to do so has passed.
`The Court has considered Judge Goodman’s reports on these motions,
`the record, and the relevant legal authorities. The Court finds Judge
`Goodman’s reports and recommendation cogent and compelling. The Court
`affirms and adopts Judge Goodman’s reports and recommendation (ECF Nos.
`236, 250). The Court denies the motion for exceptional case status (ECF No.
`163) and motion to sever and stay (ECF No. 250).
`
`Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on December 5, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_______________________________
`Robert N. Scola, Jr.
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
