throbber
Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2023 Page 1 of 9
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`Case No.: 1:22-cv-22706-SCOLA/GOODMAN
`
`
`BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HMD AMERICA, INC., HMD GLOBAL OY,
`SHENZHEN CHINO-E COMMUNICATION CO.
`LTD., WINGTECH TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD.,
`WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., BEST BUY
`CO., INC., BEST BUY STORES L.P., TARGET
`CORP., WALMART INC.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`__________________________________/
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS HMD AMERICA, INC., HMD GLOBAL OY,
`BEST BUY CO., INC., BEST BUY STORES L.P., TARGET CORP.,
`AND WALMART INC.’S MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND
`SHORTENED RESPONSE SCHEDULE
`
`Defendants HMD America, Inc., HMD Global Oy, Best Buy Stores L.P., Target Corp., and
`
`Walmart Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) move for entry of an Order modifying certain claim
`
`construction and other pretrial deadlines established in this Court’s March 28, 2023, Scheduling
`
`Order, Order of Referral to Mediation, Patent Rules, and Protective Order (ECF No. 174; the
`
`“Scheduling Order”). While Plaintiff Bell Northern Research, LLC (“Plaintiff”) opposes the
`
`motion to modify, it agrees to a shortened response period to file its response to the instant motion
`
`by Tuesday June 20, 2023.
`
`In support of this Motion, the Parties state as follows:
`
`1.
`
`The Parties had a dispute concerning the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s infringement
`
`contentions and Defendants filed a Notice of Hearing regarding that dispute with Magistrate Judge
`
`Goodman on March 1, 2023. ECF No. 142.
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2023 Page 2 of 9
`
`2.
`
`Defendants requested, and the Court granted, a stay of certain patent contention and
`
`claim construction deadlines while the dispute was pending. ECF Nos. 140, 148.
`
`3.
`
`As part of the Parties’ efforts to resolve the dispute regarding Plaintiff’s
`
`infringement contention, Plaintiff supplemented its infringement contentions on April 14, 2023,
`
`and Defendants reviewed the supplemented contentions to determine if any disputes remained.
`
`4.
`
`On April 25, 2023, the Parties filed a Supplemental Joint Status Report with Judge
`
`Goodman notifying the Court that (1) the Parties reached agreement regarding Plaintiff’s patent
`
`infringement contentions and (2) the dispute would be fully resolved upon resolution of the Parties’
`
`Joint Motion to the Court to Amend the Scheduling Order. ECF No. 171. As part of the Parties’
`
`agreement, Plaintiff agreed to further supplement its infringement contentions for one asserted
`
`patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,696,941 (“the ’941 Patent”).
`
`5.
`
`The Court granted that Motion to Amend and issued the Scheduling Order setting,
`
`among other dates, June 9, 2023, as the deadline for Defendants to serve responsive patent
`
`contentions and accompanying document production under Rules 3-3 and 3-4 of the Court’s Patent
`
`Rules. ECF No. 174.
`
`6.
`
`Plaintiff supplemented its infringement contentions for the ’941 Patent on May 24,
`
`2023, about two weeks before Defendants’ June 9, 2023, deadline for responsive patent
`
`contentions. Given that timing, the Parties agreed to extend Defendants’ deadline for responsive
`
`contentions for the ’941 Patent by three weeks to June 30, 2023, while maintaining June 9, 2023,
`
`as the deadline for Defendants’ responsive contentions for the other 12 asserted patents.
`
`7.
`
`Defendants filed and the Court granted an unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
`
`to Serve Responsive Patent Contentions for the ’941 Patent. ECF Nos. 179, 180. The deadline for
`
`Defendants’ responsive patent contentions for the ’941 Patent is set to June 30, 2023.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2023 Page 3 of 9
`
`8.
`
`Additionally, Defendants Wingtech International Inc. and Wingtech Technology
`
`Co. (“Wingtech”) filed and the Court granted an unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to serve
`
`Non-Infringement, Unenforceability, and Invalidity Contentions, which likewise sought a three
`
`week extension. ECF Nos. 181, 182. The deadline for all of Wingtech’s responsive patent
`
`contentions for all 13 asserted patents is set to the same date of June 30, 2023.
`
`9.
`
`On June 9, 2023, Defendants served on Plaintiff their responsive patent contentions
`
`for all asserted patents except the ’941 Patent.
`
`10.
`
`Patent Rule 4-1 requires the parties to identify “claim terms that the party contends
`
`should be construed by the Court” and to “jointly identify the 10 terms likely to be most significant
`
`to resolving the parties’ dispute.” ECF No. 125 at 15. The deadline for such identification is
`
`presently June 23, 2023.1
`
`11.
`
` Patent Rule 4-2 requires the parties to exchange proposed constructions and
`
`identify intrinsic and extrinsic evidentiary for their constructions. ECF No. 125 at 15-16. The
`
`deadline for such exchange is presently July 7, 2023.
`
`12.
`
`Good cause exists to modify certain claim construction and other pretrial dates. The
`
`June 30, 2023, deadline for certain responsive contentions now falls after the June 23, 2023,
`
`deadline in the Scheduling Order for the exchange of proposed terms for construction, and shortly
`
`before the July 7, 2023, deadline to exchange preliminary constructions and extrinsic evidence.
`
`Defendants cannot fully assess the claim construction issues and likely disputes, and prioritize
`
`terms for construction across all thirteen asserted patents, until all contentions are finalized and
`
`exchanged. The Parties have cooperated in good faith to resolve their dispute about Plaintiff’s
`
`
`1 In view of this imminent due date in the current scheduling order, Defendants request a shortened
`response due date for the instant motion of June 20, 2023, to which Plaintiff agrees.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2023 Page 4 of 9
`
`infringement contentions, including through Plaintiff’s service of amended contentions and patent
`
`claim charts and Defendants’ service and forthcoming additional service of responsive patent
`
`contentions and claim charts, but need a modification of the current schedule to facilitate an orderly
`
`and informed claim construction exchange.
`
`13.
`
`To maintain the timing and sequence in the Court’s Scheduling Order, ECF Nos.
`
`174, 180, Defendants request that certain claim construction deadlines and other pretrial deadlines
`
`in the Scheduling Order be extended by three weeks, corresponding to the additional three weeks
`
`set for the responsive patent contentions described above, as shown in the following proposed
`
`schedule:
`
`Current Date
`Passed
`
`Proposed Date
`
`
`Passed
`
`Passed
`
`
`
`
`
` Description
`Deadline for a party claiming patent infringement
`to serve Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
`Infringement Contentions and make
`accompanying document production.
`Deadline to submit joint notice indicating whether
`the parties consent to jurisdiction before the
`designated magistrate judge for purposes of
`dispositive motions or final disposition or both.
`Deadline for Defendants HMD America, Inc.,
`HMD Global Oy, Best Buy Stores L.P., Target
`Corp., and Walmart Inc (“Defendants”) to serve
`Non-Infringement, Unenforceability, and
`Invalidity Contentions for all asserted patents
`except U.S. Patent No. 6,696,941, and to make
`accompanying document production.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2023 Page 5 of 9
`
`Current Date
`June 30, 2023
`(extended)
`
`June 23, 20232
`
`July 7, 2023
`
`June 23, 20233
`July 28, 2023
`
`August 18, 2023
`
`September 1, 2023
`
`Proposed Date
`
`
`July 14, 2023
`
`July 28, 2023
`
` Description
`Deadline for Defendants to serve Non-
`Infringement, Unenforceability, and Invalidity
`Contentions for U.S. Patent No. 6,696,941 and
`make accompanying document production, and
`deadline for Defendants Wingtech International
`Inc., Wingtech Technology Co., and Wingtech
`Co. Ltd. to serve all Non-Infringement,
`Unenforceability, and Invalidity Contentions and
`make accompanying document production.
`Deadline to Exchange Proposed Terms for
`Construction.
`Deadline to Exchange of Preliminary Claim
`Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence.
`Deadline to file joint interim status report.
`Deadline to File Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement.
`Deadline to complete claim construction
`discovery.
`Deadline to file a motion to stay the lawsuit
`pending reexamination in the U.S. Patent Office.
`Deadline to file proposed order scheduling
`mediation, setting forth the name of the mediator,
`and the date, time, and location of the mediation,
`consistent with the order of referral to mediation.
`September 22, 2023 Deadline for any party claiming patent
`infringement to file opening claim construction
`brief (simultaneous opening briefs are not
`permitted) and deadline to file opening brief
`
`July 14, 2023
`August 18, 2023
`
`September 8, 2023
`
`
`2 This date currently precedes the June 30, 2023, deadline for Defendants’ responsive patent
`contentions for the ’941 Patent and Wingtech’s responsive patent contentions for all 13 asserted
`patents.
`3 This date currently precedes the June 30, 2023, deadline for Defendants’ responsive patent
`contentions for the ’941 Patent and Wingtech’s responsive patent contentions for all 13 asserted
`patents.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2023 Page 6 of 9
`
`Current Date
`
`Proposed Date
`
`September 22, 2023 October 13, 2023
`
`October 6, 2023
`
`October 27, 2023
`
`November 24, 2023
`
`November 24, 2023
`(Unchanged)
`
`December 1, 2023
`
`December 1, 2023
`(Unchanged)
`
`November 30, 2023
`
`January 12, 2024
`
`January 31, 2024
`
`March 20, 2024
`
`April 22, 2024
`
`November 30, 2023
`(Unchanged)
`January 12, 2024
`(Unchanged)
`January 31, 2024
`(Unchanged)
`March 20, 2024
`(Unchanged)
`April 22, 2024
`(Unchanged)
`
` Description
`asserting claims for invalidity and
`unenforceability.
`Deadline for any party opposing a claim of patent
`infringement to file responsive claim construction
`brief and deadline to file responsive brief
`regarding claims for invalidity and
`unenforceability.
`Deadline for any party claiming patent
`infringement to file reply claim construction brief
`and deadline to file reply brief regarding claims
`for invalidity and unenforceability.
`Deadline to provide information regarding advice
`of counsel. (If the Court has not yet ruled on
`claim construction the parties should file a motion
`to extend this date.)
`Deadline to complete fact discovery.
`Deadline to disclose the identity of expert
`witnesses, and to exchange expert witness
`summaries/reports pursuant to Federal Rule of
`Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). Rebuttal disclosures are
`permitted, and must conform to the deadline set
`forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`26(a)(2)(C)(ii).
`Deadline to complete mediation.
`
`Deadline to complete all expert discovery.
`
`Deadline for the filing of all dispositive motions
`and Daubert motions.
`Deadline for the filing of pretrial motions,
`including motions in limine.
`Deadline to file joint pretrial stipulation under
`Local Rule 16.1(e) and pretrial disclosures as
`required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`26(a)(3).
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2023 Page 7 of 9
`
`Current Date
`May 10, 2024
`
`Proposed Date
`May 10, 2024
`(Unchanged)
`
` Description
`Deadline to file proposed jury instructions (if the
`matter is set for a jury trial) or proposed findings
`of fact and conclusions of law (if the matter is set
`for a bench trial) consistent with Local Rule
`16.1(k).
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that this Court enter an Order requiring any
`
`response to this motion by June 20, 2023 and after consideration of any response and reply, enter
`
`an Order modifying certain patent contention, claim construction, and pretrial deadlines as set forth
`
`above.
`
`LOCAL RULE 7.1(a)(3) CERTIFICATION
`
`The Parties have conferred in good faith regarding the relief requested in this motion.
`
`Plaintiff has stated that it opposes the motion but agrees to a shortened response due date of June
`
`20, 2023. Defendants Wingtech International Inc. and Wingtech Technology Co. have provided
`
`no position on the motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`s/Joseph W. Bain
`JOSEPH W. BAIN, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 860360
`Email: jbain@shutts.com
`SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP
`1100 City Place Tower
`525 Okeechobee Boulevard
`West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
`Telephone: (561) 835-8500
`Facsimile: (561) 650-8530
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Matthew J. Moffa
`MATTHEW J. MOFFA, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
`Email: MMoffa@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`1155 Avenue of the Americas, 22nd floor
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 262-6900
`
`KEVIN PATARIU, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
`Email: kpatariu@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11452 El Camino Real
`Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92013
`Telephone: (858) 720-5700
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2023 Page 8 of 9
`
`JODI-ANN TILLMAN, ESQ.
`Florida Bar No. 1022214
`Email: jtillman@shutts.com
`SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP
`200 East Broward Blvd.
`Suite 2100
`Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
`Telephone: (561) 671-5822
`Facsimile: (561) 650-8530
`
`DEFENDANTS
`FOR
`ATTORNEYS
`HMD AMERICA, INC., HMD GLOBAL
`OY, BEST BUY, BEST BUY STORES, L.P.,
`TARGET CORP. and WALMART INC.
`
`
`
`MICHAEL A. CHAJON, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
`Email: MChajon@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`700 13th Street, NW
`Suite 800
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3960
`Telephone: (202) 654-6200
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
`HMD AMERICA, INC., HMD GLOBAL
`OY, BEST BUY, BEST BUY STORES,
`L.P., and TARGET CORP.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2023 Page 9 of 9
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 16th day of June, 2023, I electronically filed the
`foregoing with the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system which served a copy on the
`following Service List:
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`/s/Joseph W. Bain
` Joseph W. Bain
`
`Alexander Frederick Rojas, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 124232
`Jose Ignacio Rojas, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 331546
`ROJASLAW
`201 S. Biscayne Blvd., Ste 28th Floor
`Miami, FL 33131
`Telephone: (305) 446-4000
`Facsimile: (305) 985-4146
`Email: arojas@rojaslawfirm.com
`jrojas@rojaslawfirm.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC
`
`Andrew J. Fuller, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 1021164
`NELSON MULLINS RILEY &
`SCARBOROUGH LLP
`2 South Biscayne Blvd.
`Suite 21st Street
`Miami, Florida 33131
`Tel: 305-373-9487
`Email: Andrew.fuller@nelsonmullins.com
`Vicki.mattison@nelsonmullins.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
`WINGTECH TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
`WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`SERVICE LIST
`
`Christopher Clayton, Esq. (pro hac vice)
`Paul Richter, Esq. (pro hac vice)
`Adam Woodward (No. 1029147)
`DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
`1526 Gilpin Avenue
`Wilmington, DE 19806
`Telephone: (302) 449-9010
`Facsimile: (302) 353-4251
`Email: cclayton@devlinlawfirm.com
`prichter@devlinlawfirm.com
`awoodward@devlinlawfirm.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC
`
`David M. Airan, Esq. (pro hac vice)
`Christopher Gass, Esq. (pro hac vice)
`Nicole E. Kopinski Esq. (pro hac vice)
`LEYDIG, VOIT & MEYER, LTD.
`Two Prudential Plaza - Suite 4900
`180 North Stetson Avenue
`Chicago, IL 60601
`Tel: 312-616-5600
`Email: dairan@leydig.com
`cgass@leydig.com; nkopinski@leydig.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
`WINGTECH TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
`WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`
`WPBDOCS 11719304 1
`
`9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket