`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`Case No. 1:22-cv-22706-RNS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`HMD AMERICA, INC.; HMD GLOBAL OY;
`SHENZHEN CHINO-E COMMUNICATION
`CO., LTD.; TINNO MOBILE
`TECHNOLOGY CORP.; SHENZHEN
`TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD.; TINNO USA,
`INC.; UNISOC TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.;
`WINGTECH TECHNOLOGY CO.; LTD.;
`WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.;
`BEST BUY CO., INC.; BEST BUY STORES
`L.P.; TARGET CORP.; WALMART INC.
`
`Defendants.
`_______________________________________/
`
`
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
`DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY
`CORP., SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD., AND TINNO USA, INC.
`
`Plaintiff Bell Northern Research, LLC (“BNR” or “Plaintiff”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
`
`41(a)(2), hereby moves this Honorable Court to grant its motion for an order dismissing all
`
`claims in this action asserted against Defendants Tinno Mobile Technology Corp., Shenzhen
`
`Tinno Mobile Co., Ltd., and Tinno USA, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Tinno”) without prejudice. BNR
`
`submits that Tinno has not pleaded any counterclaims, and that the terms of this dismissal
`
`without prejudice are proper in that BNR and Tinno have reached an agreement. Each Party to
`
`this case shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. A proposed order of dismissal
`
`accompanies this motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 159 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2023 Page 2 of 3
`
`Dated: March 24, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Paul Richter
`Paul Richter (admitted pro hac vice)
`prichter@devlinlawfirm.com
`Christopher Clayton (admitted pro hac vice)
`cclayton@devlinlawfirm.com
`Adam Woodward
`awoodward@devlinlawfirm.com
`Florida Bar No. 1029147
`DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
`1526 Gilpin Avenue
`Wilmington, Delaware 19806
`Telephone: (302) 449-9010
`Facsimile: (302) 353-4251
`
`Jose I. Rojas
`Florida Bar No. 331546
`jrojas@rojaslawfirm.com
`Alexander F. Rojas
`Florida Bar No. 124232
`arojas@rojaslawfirm.com
`ROJASLAW
`201 S. Biscayne Blvd., 28th Floor
`Miami, FL 33131
`Telephone: (305) 446-4000
`Facsimile: (305) 985-4146
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Bell Northern
`Research, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 159 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2023 Page 3 of 3
`
`CERTIFICATION OF PRE-FILING CONFERENCE
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a)(3), the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff Bell Northern
`
`Research, LLC certifies that Plaintiff’s counsel conferred on March 22–23, 2023 on all of the
`
`issues raised in this motion with counsel for all of the Defendants in this action that have entered
`
`an appearance, namely: HMD America, Inc., HMD Global Oy (collectively, “HMD”), Tinno
`
`Mobile Technology Corp., Shenzehn Tinno Mobile Co., Ltd., Tinno USA, Inc. (collectively,
`
`“Tinno”), Wingtech Technology Co. Ltd., Wingtech International, Inc. (collectively,
`
`“Wingtech”), Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores L.P. (collectively, “Best Buy”), Target Corp.
`
`(“Target”), and Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”).
`
`Counsel for HMD, Target, and Best Buy indicated they do not oppose this motion “so
`
`long as BNR will not use the absence of Tinno from discovery or the case to prejudice the other
`
`defendants HMD, Target, and Best Buy[.]” Counsel for Walmart indicated that they will not
`
`oppose the motion with the same understanding. Counsel for Wingtech indicated that it does not
`
`oppose. Counsel for Tinno indicated that it does not oppose.
`
`The movant has conferred with all parties or non-parties who may be affected by the
`
`relief requested.
`
`/s/ Paul Richter
`Paul Richter
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are
`
`being served with a copy of this document on March 24, 2023.
`
`/s/ Paul Richter
`Paul Richter
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`