throbber
Case 1:18-cv-00318-RGA-SRF Document 82 Filed 07/28/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 11876
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`600 North King Street ● Suite 400
`
`
`
`
`P.O. Box 25130 ● Wilmington, DE 19899
`
`
`
`Zip Code For Deliveries 19801
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Writer’s Direct Access:
`
`
`
` (302) 429-4232
`
` Email: sbrauerman@bayardlaw.com
`
`July 28, 2021
`
`BY CM/ECF
`
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`United States District Court for the District of Delaware
`844 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`
`
`
`Re: IPA Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 1:18-cv-00001-RGA-SRF (D. Del.)
`and IPA Technologies Inc. v. Google LLC., No. 1:18-cv-00318-RGA-SRF (D. Del.)
`
`
`Dear Judge Andrews,
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s July 23, 2021 Oral Order (D.I. 81), the parties submit the
`following joint status update concerning the above-captioned litigations.
`
`On January 10, 2020, this Court stayed the present matters pending resolution of various
`IPR petitions filed by Microsoft and Google. (D.I. 77).
`
`Specifically, pursuant to petitions filed by Microsoft, the PTAB instituted eight IPRs
`(IPR 2019-00810, -00811, -00812, -00813, -00814, -00835, -00836, and -00837) challenging all
`144 issued claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,851,115 and 7,069,560. The PTAB denied institution of
`Microsoft’s petitions directed to IPA’s U.S. Patent No. 7,036,128. Between October 15 and
`November 22, 2020, the Board issued Final Written Decisions in all eight instituted IPRs,
`finding 109 of the challenged claims unpatentable and 35 claims not unpatentable.
`
`Pursuant to petitions filed by Google, the PTAB instituted five IPRs (IPR 2019-00728, -
`00730, -00731, -00733, and -00734) challenging a subset of the issued claims of US. Patent Nos.
`6,851,115; 7,069,560; and 7,036,128.1 On September 2 and 16, 2020, the PTAB issued Final
`Written Decisions in IPR2019-00728, -00730, and -00731 determining that Google failed to
`show any of the challenged claims of the ’115 and ’560 patents were unpatentable. On October
`15, 2020, the Board issued Final Written Decisions in IPR2019-00733 and -00734 finding that
`all of the challenged claims of the ’128 were unpatentable.
`
`All parties have filed appeals with the Federal Circuit challenging their respective losses.
`Google and Microsoft contend the challenged claims in the Google and Microsoft appeals are
`
`1 Google filed four other IPR petitions challenging the same patents, but the Board denied
`institution.
`
`www.bayardlaw.com
`
`
`
` Phone: (302) 655-5000
`
`
`
` Fax: (302) 658-6395
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-00318-RGA-SRF Document 82 Filed 07/28/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 11877
`
`
`
`
`
`August 7, 2019
`Page 2
`
`
`fairly representative of all claims at issue as previously briefed in Google’s Motion to Stay (No.
`1:18-cv-00318-RGA-SRF, D.I. 74).
`
`The current briefing schedule at the Federal Circuit is as follows:
`
`Federal Circuit Case 2021-1412 relating to the Microsoft IPRs, (consolidated with No. 21-
`1413, 21-1414, 21-1415, 21-1416, 21-1417, 21-1418, 21-1419, 21-1420, 21-1421, 21-1422, 21-
`1423, 21-14, 24, 21-1440, and 21-1442)
`Event
`Microsoft’s Principal Brief
`IPA’s Principal and Response Brief
`
`Current Deadline
`May 3, 2021 (filed)
`July 1, 2021 (filed)
`
`Microsoft’s Response and Reply Brief
`IPA’s Reply Brief
`Oral Argument
`
`August 27, 2021
`September 3, 2021
`No date set at this time
`
`
`Federal Circuit Case No. 2021-1179 relating to Google’s ‘115 and 560 Patent IPRs
`(consolidated with Nos. 21-1180 and 21-1185)
`Event
`
`Appellant’s Brief
`Appellee’s Brief
`Appellant’s Reply Brief
`Oral Argument
`
`Current Deadline
`April 20, 2021 (filed)
`July 29, 2021
`September 2, 2021
`No Date Set at this Time
`
`
`Federal Circuit Case 2021-1438 relating to Google’s ‘128 Patent IPRs (consolidated with No.
`21-1439)
`
`Event
`
`Current Deadline
`June 1, 2021 (filed)
`September 9, 2021
`October 14, 2021
`No date set at this time
`
`Appellant’s Brief
`Appellee’s Brief
`Appellant’s Reply Brief
`Oral Argument
`
`On June 23, 2021, the Federal Circuit stayed all deadlines in Case Nos. 2021-1438 and
`21-1439 (relating to Google’s ‘128 Patent IPRs) to consider how to handle pending
`Appointments Clause challenges following the recent decision of the Supreme Court in United
`States v. Arthrex., Inc., Nos. 19-1434 et al., 2021 WL 2519433 (U.S. June 21, 2021.) On July 7,
`2021, IPA filed a notice withdrawing its Appointments Clause challenge raised in its Opening
`Brief.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Stephen B. Brauerman
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Stephen B. Brauerman (#4952)
`
`
`cc:
`
`
`
`All counsel of record
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket