Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 90-1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1087
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 90-1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 1088
`
`Marek, Michelle
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>
`Tuesday, October 16, 2018 12:27 PM
`Unikel, Robert
`[EXT] RE: 10/15 2:30EDT/1:30CT Meet-and-Confer - Dial-in and Passcode
`
`Hi Robert,
`Nice speaking to you yesterday. The list below is provisional for what we intend to put in supplemental charts, but it is
`what we currently intend to do with respect to Google.
`Best,
`Seth
`
`
`I.
`
`
`
` Google accused instrumentalities:
`
`
`1. Google Gmail (App and Web access)
`2. Google Docs
`3. Google Nexus and Google Pixel branded devices
`
` ∙
`
` o
`
` Claims we intend to chart Google infringement contentions for:
`
` ’993 Patent: 1, 5, 8, 9, 13, 16, 17, 18, 21, 24
`o ‘843 Patent: 1, 8, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 23, 30 (already charted for old products)
`
`From: Unikel, Robert [mailto:robertunikel@paulhastings.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 9:18 AM
`To: Seth Ard
`Subject: RE: 10/15 2:30EDT/1:30CT Meet-and-Confer - Dial-in and Passcode
`
`Seth,
`I you could please send me an email letting me know what Arendi is proposing to add with respect to Google and
`Motorola, I would appreciate it. Google and Motorola cannot determine how to respond regarding schedule issues
`unless and until they know how Arendi is intending to proceed.
`
`Thanks,
`Rob
`
`
`
`____________________________________________________________________________
`Robert Unikel | Partner
`Paul Hastings LLP | 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4500, Chicago, Illinois 60606 |
`Direct: +1.312.499.6030 | Main: +1.312.499.6000 | Fax: +1.312.499.6131 |
`robertunikel@paulhastings.com | www.paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 90-1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 1089
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit B
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 90-1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 1090
`
`Marek, Michelle
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Unikel, Robert
`Monday, November 12, 2018 10:54 AM
`John Lahad
`Seth Ard; Eve H. Ormerod; Steve Susman; Neal C. Belgam; Peterman, Chad; Laurenzi,
`Robert; Marek, Michelle; Bratton, Ariell; d moore; bpalapura@potteranderson.com; Max
`Straus
`RE: Arendi v. Google and Moto
`
`How about 1:00 CT instead?
`
`
`
`____________________________________________________________________________
`
`Robert Unikel | Partner
`Paul Hastings LLP | 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4500, Chicago, Illinois 60606 | Direct: +1.312.499.6030 | Main:
`+1.312.499.6000 | Fax: +1.312.499.6131 | robertunikel@paulhastings.com | www.paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
`From: John Lahad [mailto:jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com]
`Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 10:36 AM
`To: Unikel, Robert
`Cc: Seth Ard; Eve H. Ormerod; Steve Susman; Neal C. Belgam; Peterman, Chad; Laurenzi, Robert; Marek, Michelle;
`Bratton, Ariell; d moore; bpalapura@potteranderson.com; Max Straus
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Arendi v. Google and Moto
`
`Can we do 11:30 central?
`
`JOHN P. LAHAD
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`713‐653‐7859 (OFFICE)
`713‐725‐3557 (MOBILE)
`CLICK HERE FOR BIO
`
`THIS MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. IF YOU'RE NOT THE INTENDED
`RECIPIENT, PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE.
`
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
`From: Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>
`Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 10:31 AM
`To: John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>
`Cc: Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; Eve H. Ormerod <eho@skjlaw.com>; Steve Susman
`<SSusman@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Neal C. Belgam <NCB@skjlaw.com>; Peterman, Chad
`<chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>; Laurenzi, Robert <robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>; Marek, Michelle
`<michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Bratton, Ariell <ariellbratton@paulhastings.com>; d moore
`<dmoore@potteranderson.com>; bpalapura@potteranderson.com; Max Straus <MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 90-1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 1091
`Subject: RE: Arendi v. Google and Moto
`
`Does 11:00 CT work for you? If so, we can use the same dial‐in number from Friday (shown in the chain below).
`
`
`
`____________________________________________________________________________
`
`Robert Unikel | Partner
`Paul Hastings LLP | 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4500, Chicago, Illinois 60606 | Direct: +1.312.499.6030 | Main:
`+1.312.499.6000 | Fax: +1.312.499.6131 | robertunikel@paulhastings.com | www.paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
`From: John Lahad [mailto:jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com]
`Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 10:29 AM
`To: Unikel, Robert
`Cc: Seth Ard; Eve H. Ormerod; Steve Susman; Neal C. Belgam; Peterman, Chad; Laurenzi, Robert; Marek, Michelle;
`Bratton, Ariell; d moore; bpalapura@potteranderson.com; Max Straus
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Arendi v. Google and Moto
`
`Good morning Robert. Are you free to chat today? If yes, let me know what time works for you.
`Thanks.
`
`JOHN P. LAHAD
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`713‐653‐7859 (OFFICE)
`713‐725‐3557 (MOBILE)
`CLICK HERE FOR BIO
`
`THIS MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. IF YOU'RE NOT THE INTENDED
`RECIPIENT, PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE.
`
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
`From: Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>
`Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 7:19 AM
`To: John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>
`Cc: Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; Eve H. Ormerod <eho@skjlaw.com>; Steve Susman
`<SSusman@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Neal C. Belgam <NCB@skjlaw.com>; Peterman, Chad
`<chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>; Laurenzi, Robert <robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>; Marek, Michelle
`<michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Bratton, Ariell <ariellbratton@paulhastings.com>; d moore
`<dmoore@potteranderson.com>; bpalapura@potteranderson.com; Max Straus <MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>
`Subject: Re: Arendi v. Google and Moto
`
`Seth and John,
`Sometime this morning, please let me know where things stand on this issues we discussed on Friday.
`Thanks,
`Rob
`
`On Nov 9, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com> wrote:
`
`For today's meet‐and‐confer discussion at 3:00 CT/4:00 ET, please use the following dial‐in information:
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 90-1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 1092
`
`
`1‐800‐308‐2601
`Passcode: 312‐499‐6034
`
`Thanks.
`
`
`
`____________________________________________________________________________
`
`Robert Unikel | Partner
`Paul Hastings LLP | 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4500, Chicago, Illinois 60606 | Direct: +1.312.499.6030 | Main:
`+1.312.499.6000 | Fax: +1.312.499.6131 | robertunikel@paulhastings.com | www.paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
`From: John Lahad [mailto:jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com]
`Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 5:07 PM
`To: Unikel, Robert
`Cc: Seth Ard; Eve H. Ormerod; Steve Susman; Neal C. Belgam; Peterman, Chad; Laurenzi, Robert; Marek, Michelle;
`Bratton, Ariell; d moore; bpalapura@potteranderson.com; Max Straus
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Arendi v. Google and Moto
`
`Sure, can impose on you to circulate a dial‐in please?
`
`JOHN P. LAHAD
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`713‐653‐7859 (OFFICE)
`713‐725‐3557 (MOBILE)
`CLICK HERE FOR BIO
`
`THIS MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. IF YOU'RE NOT THE INTENDED
`RECIPIENT, PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE.
`
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
`From: Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>
`Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 5:05 PM
`To: John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>
`Cc: Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; Eve H. Ormerod <eho@skjlaw.com>; Steve Susman
`<SSusman@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Neal C. Belgam <NCB@skjlaw.com>; Peterman, Chad
`<chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>; Laurenzi, Robert <robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>; Marek, Michelle
`<michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Bratton, Ariell <ariellbratton@paulhastings.com>; d moore
`<dmoore@potteranderson.com>; bpalapura@potteranderson.com; Max Straus <MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>
`Subject: Re: Arendi v. Google and Moto
`
`John,
`Let's go ahead and schedule a call for 3:00 CT call. Hopefully, David Moore or Bindu Palapura can join, but given the time
`constraints, I think it's important for us to talk either way.
`Thanks,
`Rob
`
`On Nov 8, 2018, at 4:52 PM, John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com> wrote:
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 90-1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 1093
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit C
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 90-1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 1094
`
`Marek, Michelle
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Attachments:
`
`John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>
`Friday, November 16, 2018 3:20 PM
`Unikel, Robert
`Seth Ard; Eve H. Ormerod; Steve Susman; Neal C. Belgam; Peterman, Chad; Laurenzi,
`Robert; Marek, Michelle; Bratton, Ariell; d moore; bpalapura@potteranderson.com; Max
`Straus; Richard A. Wojtczak
`[EXT] RE: Arendi v. Google and Moto
`Possible additions to Google complaint.pdf
`
`Robert:
`This is, admittedly, a touch late to you, but let me know if this helps address your “specificity” concern or
`what else you need. These paragraphs would be in the relevant sections in the complaint. Of course, nothing
`in these additions limits in any way Arendi’s forthcoming claim charts, discovery, claim construction, etc. If
`we’re on the right track (and there is nothing else holding us up), I suggest another week‐long extension to
`hammer things out. Otherwise, we can just file the motion. Thank you.
`
`JOHN P. LAHAD
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`713‐653‐7859 (OFFICE)
`713‐725‐3557 (MOBILE)
`CLICK HERE FOR BIO
`
`THIS MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. IF YOU'RE NOT THE INTENDED
`RECIPIENT, PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE.
`
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
`From: Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>
`Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 3:18 PM
`To: John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>
`Cc: Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; Eve H. Ormerod <eho@skjlaw.com>; Steve Susman
`<SSusman@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Neal C. Belgam <NCB@skjlaw.com>; Peterman, Chad
`<chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>; Laurenzi, Robert <robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>; Marek, Michelle
`<michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Bratton, Ariell <ariellbratton@paulhastings.com>; d moore
`<dmoore@potteranderson.com>; bpalapura@potteranderson.com; Max Straus
`<MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>
`Subject: RE: Arendi v. Google and Moto
`
`Thanks, John. We are amenable to pushing the motion deadline to next Monday or Tuesday, though due to
`the Thanksgiving holiday, I ask that the stipulation provide that Google's response is due on November
`29. Thanks. Hopefully, we can resolve this without need for motion practice.
`
`Rob
`
`____________________________________________________________________________
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 90-1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 1095
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 90-1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 1095
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT D
`
`EXHIBIT D
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 90-1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 1096
`
`Marek, Michelle
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Unikel, Robert
`Monday, November 19, 2018 2:01 PM
`John Lahad
`Seth Ard; Eve H. Ormerod; Steve Susman; Neal C. Belgam; Peterman, Chad; Laurenzi,
`Robert; Marek, Michelle; Bratton, Ariell; d moore; bpalapura@potteranderson.com; Max
`Straus; Richard A. Wojtczak
`Re: [EXT] Re: Arendi v. Google and Moto
`
`Thanks, John. While it may make sense for us to continue to talk, I would go ahead and file your motion today, and
`Google will plan to oppose by the 29th. Thanks, and I hope you have a great holiday as well.
`
`Rob
`
`
`On Nov 19, 2018, at 1:46 PM, John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com> wrote:
`
`Good afternoon Robert. Let me know if you and your client have any thoughts on the addition. If it makes sense to
`extend the deadline further, we can. Alternatively, we can simply file our motion. Even if we file, we’re happy to
`continue the dialog. Let me know.
`Thank you.
`If we don’t chat, have a good Thanksgiving.
`Best,
`John
`
`Sent from my iPhone
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
` >
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
