throbber
Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 619 Filed 02/23/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 62520
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-JLH
`
`PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L. respectfully submits this amended notice of its appeal to the
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Plaintiff appeals from the District Court’s
`
`Final Judgment, D.I. 616, entered on February 2, 2024, and all interlocutory orders that gave rise
`
`to that final judgment.1
`
`This amended notice of appeal is timely under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure
`
`4(a)(1)(A) and 4(a)(4). The District Court entered Judgment Following Verdict, D.I. 545, on May
`
`
`1 Appeal of this judgment includes appeal of the accompanying jury verdict of non-infringement,
`D.I. 530 & 531; the Court’s predicate Claim Construction Order of August 19, 2019, D.I. 144; see
`also D.I. 145 (memorandum opinion regarding claim construction); the Court’s granting of partial
`summary judgment against Arendi, D.I. 393, 394; the Court’s denial of Arendi’s motions regarding
`IPR estoppel, e.g., D.I. 391; D.I. 578 at 4:19-14:11; the Court’s denial in part of remaining portions
`of Arendi’s motion for summary judgment, D.I. 391, 392; the Court’s exclusion of evidence
`concerning infringement by the doctrine of equivalents, D.I. 257; the Court’s exclusion of evidence
`concerning the date of conception of the U.S. Patent No. 7,917,843, D.I. 258; the Court’s denial
`of Arendi’s Motion to Exclude in Part the Expert Reports and Testimony of Edward Fox, D.I. 391,
`392; the Court’s denial in part of Arendi’s Motion to Exclude Portions of Dr. Martin Rinard’s
`Expert Report, D.I. 393, 394; and the Court’s granting of Judgment on the Pleadings with respect
`to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,496,854, 7,921,356 and 8,306,993, D.I. 200, 201; see also D.I. 119 at 111:17-
`119:14. Arendi reserves the right to raise all appropriate issues on appeal.
`The jury’s verdict of invalidity is not a predicate for final judgment in this case, is moot
`and, therefore, is not a subject of this notice of appeal. Google LLC did not assert a counterclaim
`of invalidity and the operative Final Judgment is, therefore, limited to invalidity. See D.I. 615, 616.
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 619 Filed 02/23/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 62521
`
`10, 2023.2 On June 2, 2023, Arendi timely moved for judgment as a matter of law and, in the
`
`alternative, for a new trial under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) and 59(a)(1). D.I. 559.
`
`The District Court resolved those motions and entered Final Judgment on February 2, 2024. D.I.
`
`615.
`
`Plaintiff has submitted the required filing fee and respectfully requests the district clerk to
`
`prepare the record on appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(a). Plaintiff will
`
`order from the reporter a transcript of such part of the proceedings not already on file as the
`
`appellant considers necessary, as required by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(b)(1)(A).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 Arendi filed a preliminary Notice of Appeal of the Judgment Following Verdict on June 9, 2023.
`Arendi noted therein that its notice would only “become[] effective . . . when the order disposing
`of the last” of its post-trial motions was entered per Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure
`4(a)(4)(B)(i). D.I. 567. Arendi expressly “reserve[d] the right to file an amended notice of appeal”
`following entry of such order. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii).” Id. That preliminary Notice of
`Appeal is now withdrawn and superseded by this Amended Notice of Appeal.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 619 Filed 02/23/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 62522
`
`Dated: February 23, 2024
`
`
`Of counsel:
`
`Seth Ard
`Max Straus
`Beatrice Franklin
`SUSMAN GODFREY, L.L.P.
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
`New York, New York 10019
`Tel: (212) 336-8330
`sard@susmangodfrey.com
`mstraus@susmangodfrey.com
`bfranklin@susmangodfrey.com
`
`John Lahad
`SUSMAN GODFREY, LLP
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, TX 77002-5096
`jlahad@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kalpana Srinivasan
`SUSMAN GODFREY, LLP
`1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Tel: (310) 789-3106
`ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kemper Diehl
`SUSMAN GODFREY, L.L.P.
`401 Union Street, Suite 3000
`Seattle, WA 98101-3000
`Tel: (206) 516-3880
`kdiehl@susmangodfrey.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS LLP
`
`
`/s/ Neal C. Belgam
`Neal C. Belgam (No. 2721)
`Daniel A. Taylor (No. 6934)
`1000 West Street, Suite 1501
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 652-8400
`nbelgam@skjlaw.com
`dtaylor@skjlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L.
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket