`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 558-1 Filed 05/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #: 56832
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 558-1 Filed 05/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 56833
`
`May 1, 2023
`
`Via e-mail
`
`Andrea Pallios Roberts
`Paul Hastings
`1117 California Ave.
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`andrearoberts@paulhastings.com
`
`Re:
`
`Disclosure of Apple Confidential Information in Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Google LLC, C.A.
`No. 13-919-JLH
`
`Dear Andrea,
`
`I write on behalf of Apple Inc. (“Apple”) regarding the above-referenced litigation (the “Google
`Lawsuit”). Google has requested that the Google corporate representative, Ted Choc, remain in
`the sealed courtroom during closing arguments. Given the events that transpired at trial
`including the fact that Arendi improperly disclosed Apple Confidential Business Information
`(“Apple CBI”) in Mr. Choc’s presence, Apple does not object to Mr. Choc attending closing
`arguments provided that Mr. Choc agrees (i) to keep the Apple CBI confidential, and (ii) to sign
`the Attachment A to the Agreed Protective Order Confidential Agreement.
`
`Note that it is due to the unusual circumstances of this case that Apple agrees to allow
`Mr. Choc to remain in the courtroom during closing arguments. Please let me know if you
`would like to discuss, and in the meantime, Apple expressly reserves all rights and remedies.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Hannah Cannom
`
`HANNAH CANNOM | 213.337.9972 | hcannom@wscllp.com
`500 Molino Street | Suite 118 | Los Angeles, CA 90013
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
