Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 254 Filed 01/19/21 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 8611
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-LPS
`
`Original Version Filed: January 12, 2021
`Public Version Filed: January 19, 2021
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT TO LETTER TO THE HONORABLE LEONARD P.
`STARK RESPONDING TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF DR.
`TREVOR SMEDLEY’S REPORT EXPERT REPORTS REGARDING INFRINGEMENT
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,917,843
`
`SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS LLP
`Neal C. Belgam (No. 2721)
`Eve H. Ormerod (No. 5369)
`1000 West Street, Suite 1501
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Tel: (302) 652-8400
`nbelgam@skjlaw.com
`eormerod@skjlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L.
`
`Dated: January 12, 2021
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Seth Ard
`Beatrice Franklin
`Max Straus
`SUSMAN GODFREY, LLP
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`sard@susmangodfrey.com
`bfranklin@susmangodfrey.com
`mstraus@susmangodfrey.com
`
`John Lahad
`Emi Lawson
`Burton DeWitt
`Robert Travis Korman
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, TX 77002-5096
`jlahad@susmangodfrey.com
`elawson@susmangodfrey.com
`bdewitt@susmangodfrey.com
`tkorman@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kalpana Srinivasan
`1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-LPS
`
`Original Version Filed: January 12, 2021
`Public Version Filed: January 19, 2021
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT TO LETTER TO THE HONORABLE LEONARD P.
`STARK RESPONDING TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF DR.
`TREVOR SMEDLEY’S REPORT EXPERT REPORTS REGARDING INFRINGEMENT
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,917,843
`
`SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS LLP
`Neal C. Belgam (No. 2721)
`Eve H. Ormerod (No. 5369)
`1000 West Street, Suite 1501
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Tel: (302) 652-8400
`nbelgam@skjlaw.com
`eormerod@skjlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L.
`
`Dated: January 12, 2021
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Seth Ard
`Beatrice Franklin
`Max Straus
`SUSMAN GODFREY, LLP
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`sard@susmangodfrey.com
`bfranklin@susmangodfrey.com
`mstraus@susmangodfrey.com
`
`John Lahad
`Emi Lawson
`Burton DeWitt
`Robert Travis Korman
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, TX 77002-5096
`jlahad@susmangodfrey.com
`elawson@susmangodfrey.com
`bdewitt@susmangodfrey.com
`tkorman@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kalpana Srinivasan
`1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 254 Filed 01/19/21 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 8612
`
`Kemper Diehl
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
`Seattle, WA 98101-3000
`kdiehl@susmangodfrey.com
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 254 Filed 01/19/21 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 8613
`Case 1:13-cv-00919—LPS Document 254 Filed 01/19/21 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 8613
`
`EXHIBIT F
`
`EXHIBIT F
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 254 Filed 01/19/21 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 8614
`
`·1· · ·HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.· ATTORNEY EYES ONLY - RINARD
`
`Page 1
`
`·2· · · · · · ·IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`·3· · · · · · · · FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`·4
`
`·5· ·------------------------------x
`
`·6· ·ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · Plaintiff,
`
`·8· · · · · · · vs.
`
`·9· ·GOOGLE LLC,
`
`10· · · · · · · · · Defendant.
`
`11· ·------------------------------x
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14· · · · REMOTE VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MARTIN RINARD
`
`15· · · · · · · · · · · ·ARLINGTON, MA
`
`16· · · · · · · · ·THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2020
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23· ·Reported by:
`
`24· ·Teri C. Gibson, CSR, RPR, CRR
`
`25· ·JOB NO: 187749
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 254 Filed 01/19/21 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 8615
`
`·1· · ·HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.· ATTORNEY EYES ONLY - RINARD
`
`Page 13
`
`·2· ·is a very straightforward question.· Obviously, this
`
`·3· ·is my report.· I reviewed it extensively, and I agree
`
`·4· ·with everything in it.
`
`·5· · · · Q.· · Not meant to be a trick question, really,
`
`·6· ·just basic background questions asked at the beginning
`
`·7· ·of any deposition.
`
`·8· · · · A.· · Okay.· Good to know.
`
`·9· · · · Q.· · We are now, I suppose, about two months on
`
`10· ·from when you submitted that report.· Having had some
`
`11· ·additional time to consider what you wrote, have any
`
`12· ·of your opinions changed?
`
`13· · · · A.· · I would say no.
`
`14· · · · Q.· · Have you had an opportunity to review
`
`15· ·Dr. Smedley's reply report?
`
`16· · · · A.· · I am sorry.· You broke up there.· Can you
`
`17· ·repeat the question, please?
`
`18· · · · Q.· · Have you had an opportunity to review
`
`19· ·Dr. Smedley's reply report?
`
`20· · · · A.· · Yes.
`
`21· · · · Q.· · And did anything in that report cause you
`
`22· ·to re-evaluate your opinions?
`
`23· · · · A.· · I considered what Dr. Smedley said in his
`
`24· ·report.· I did -- nothing there caused me to
`
`25· ·re-evaluate any of my opinions, to change any of my
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 254 Filed 01/19/21 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 8616
`
`·1· · ·HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.· ATTORNEY EYES ONLY - RINARD
`
`Page 14
`
`·2· ·opinions.
`
`·3· · · · Q.· · Have you formed any additional opinions
`
`·4· ·that aren't reflected in this report?
`
`·5· · · · A.· · Not that I intend to put forth here today.
`
`·6· · · · Q.· · Do you expect to submit any additional
`
`·7· ·reports in the future in this case?
`
`·8· · · · A.· · I don't know.
`
`·9· · · · Q.· · Do you anticipate expanding on the --
`
`10· ·strike that.· My apologies.
`
`11· · · · · · · Do you anticipate forming any new opinions
`
`12· ·in response to what is found in Dr. Smedley's reply
`
`13· ·report?
`
`14· · · · · · · · · MR. LAURENZI:· Objection, form.
`
`15· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Sitting here today, I
`
`16· ·wouldn't say I have an expectation that I will or will
`
`17· ·not.· That will be determined by events as they play
`
`18· ·out into the future.
`
`19· · · · Q.· · You were hired in this case to provide
`
`20· ·expert opinions that Google's products don't infringe
`
`21· ·the asserted patents, correct?
`
`22· · · · · · · · · MR. LAURENZI:· Objection, form.
`
`23· · · · Q.· · I apologize.· Could you please repeat that,
`
`24· ·Dr. Rinard?· The objection and your response cut out.
`
`25· · · · A.· · I am sorry.· Yes.· Are we all synced up and
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 254 Filed 01/19/21 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 8617
`
`·1· · ·HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.· ATTORNEY EYES ONLY - RINARD
`
`Page 297
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · · C E R T I F I C A T E
`
`·3· · ·STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS )
`
`·4· · ·SUFFOLK COUNTY )
`
`·5· · · · · · ·I, TERI C. GIBSON, Registered Reporter,
`
`·6· ·Certified Realtime Reporter, and Notary Public within and
`
`·7· ·for the State of Massachusetts, do hereby certify:
`
`·8· · · · · · ·In the 17th day of December, 2020, before me,
`
`·9· ·the undersigned Notary Public, remotely appeared Martin
`
`10· ·Rinard, who proved to me through satisfactory evidence of
`
`11· ·identification, which was a MASSACHUSETTS DRIVER'S
`
`12· ·LICENSE; that the witness was duly sworn by me, and that
`
`13· ·such testimony is a true and accurate record of my
`
`14· ·stenotype notes taken in the foregoing matter, with use of
`
`15· ·mechanical stenography, computer aided transcription, to
`
`16· ·the best of my knowledge, skill and ability.· I further
`
`17· ·certify that I am not related to any of the parties to
`
`18· ·this action by blood or marriage and that I am in no way
`
`19· ·interested in the outcome of this matter.
`
`20· · · · · · ·In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand
`
`21· ·this 2nd day of January, 2021.
`
`22· · · · · · ·________________________________
`
`23· · · TERI C. GIBSON, CSR, RPR, CRR
`
`24· ·Notary Public - My Commission Expires:· 2/7/2025
`
`25
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
