Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 216-1 Filed 08/28/20 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 6268
`Case 1:13-cv-00919—LPS Document 216-1 Filed 08/28/20 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 6268
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919—LPS Document 216-1 Filed 08/28/20 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 6268
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 216-1 Filed 08/28/20 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 6269
`
`From:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Peterman, Chad
`Beatrice Franklin; Bindu Palapura; David Moore; Marek, Michelle; Richard Horwitz; Unikel, Robert; Stephanie
`O"Byrne; Lind, Matt; Laurenzi, Robert
`Seth Ard; John Lahad; Kemper Diehl; Max Straus; eormerod@skjlaw.com; nbelgam@skjlaw.com; Charla
`Clements; Richard Wojtczak
`RE: Arendi v. Google/Motorola - financial information
`Friday, July 31, 2020 10:56:16 AM
`mg info.txt
`
`Counsel –
`
`Following up on our call from earlier this week and having duly considered your positions, Google
`maintains its objections to sharing its highly confidential unit information with Mr. Hedloy.
`
`Regards,
`Chad
`
`From: Beatrice Franklin <BFranklin@susmangodfrey.com>
`Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 11:42 PM
`To: Peterman, Chad <chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>; Bindu Palapura
`<bpalapura@potteranderson.com>; David Moore <dmoore@potteranderson.com>; Marek,
`Michelle <michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Richard Horwitz <rhorwitz@potteranderson.com>;
`Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>; Stephanie O'Byrne
`<sobyrne@potteranderson.com>; Lind, Matt <mattlind@paulhastings.com>; Laurenzi, Robert
`<robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>
`Cc: Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Kemper
`Diehl <KDiehl@susmangodfrey.com>; Max Straus <MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>;
`eormerod@skjlaw.com; nbelgam@skjlaw.com; Charla Clements <CClements@susmangodfrey.com>;
`Richard Wojtczak <rwojtczak@susmangodfrey.com>
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Arendi v. Google/Motorola - financial information
`
`Thanks, Chad. I’m afraid we’re unavailable at 11am ET tomorrow. We could do between 1-3pm ET.
`Otherwise, we’re available after 11:30am ET on Monday. Let us know what works.
`
`
`Beatrice Franklin | Susman Godfrey LLP
`212.729.2021 (o) | 617.710.7850 (c)
`
`From: Peterman, Chad <chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>
`Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 6:56 PM
`To: Beatrice Franklin <BFranklin@susmangodfrey.com>; Bindu Palapura
`<bpalapura@potteranderson.com>; David Moore <dmoore@potteranderson.com>; Marek,
`Michelle <michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Richard Horwitz <rhorwitz@potteranderson.com>;
`Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>; Stephanie O'Byrne
`<sobyrne@potteranderson.com>; Lind, Matt <mattlind@paulhastings.com>; Laurenzi, Robert
`<robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>
`Cc: Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Kemper
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 216-1 Filed 08/28/20 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 6270
`
`Diehl <KDiehl@susmangodfrey.com>; Max Straus <MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>;
`eormerod@skjlaw.com; nbelgam@skjlaw.com; Charla Clements <CClements@susmangodfrey.com>;
`Richard Wojtczak <rwojtczak@susmangodfrey.com>
`Subject: RE: Arendi v. Google/Motorola - financial information
`
`Beatrice –
`
`Arendi originally made this request exactly five months ago. Google promptly denied it on February
`28. Then 143 days passed before we heard from you again on this issue. At a minimum, your inaction
`amounts to waiver. Any argument that your client needs access to Google’s highly sensitive material
`is directly controverted by your conduct. If you still insist on a meet and confer despite your waiver,
`we are available tomorrow at 11 AM ET. Please send a call in.
`
`Regards,
`Chad
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Beatrice Franklin <BFranklin@susmangodfrey.com>
`Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 12:53 PM
`To: Peterman, Chad <chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>; Bindu Palapura
`<bpalapura@potteranderson.com>; David Moore <dmoore@potteranderson.com>; Marek,
`Michelle <michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Richard Horwitz <rhorwitz@potteranderson.com>;
`Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>; Stephanie O'Byrne
`<sobyrne@potteranderson.com>; Lind, Matt <mattlind@paulhastings.com>; Laurenzi, Robert
`<robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>
`Cc: Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Kemper
`Diehl <KDiehl@susmangodfrey.com>; Max Straus <MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>;
`eormerod@skjlaw.com; nbelgam@skjlaw.com; Charla Clements <CClements@susmangodfrey.com>;
`Richard Wojtczak <rwojtczak@susmangodfrey.com>
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Arendi v. Google/Motorola - financial information
`
`Chad,
`
`As you well know, the burden of justifying a confidentiality designation—namely, showing that
`disclosure of the information “is likely to cause economic harm or significant competitive
`disadvantage to the Producing Party”—is on the party asserting the designation, including when
`counsel seeks permission from the producing party to show documents relating to damages to their
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 216-1 Filed 08/28/20 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 6271
`
`client. PO 6(D). Several other defendants have consented to our sharing unit information with our
`client, so we are at a loss for what Google’s basis is for refusing to do the same. The Protective Order
`also provides that the parties will meet and confer promptly, within five business days of the
`request, when any issues with respect to designations arise. Please let us know when you are
`available to meet and confer within that five-day window—e.g., today or tomorrow.
`
`All the best,
`Beatrice
`
`
`Beatrice Franklin | Susman Godfrey LLP
`212.729.2021 (o) | 617.710.7850 (c)
`
`From: Peterman, Chad <chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>
`Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 10:46 AM
`To: Beatrice Franklin <BFranklin@susmangodfrey.com>; Bindu Palapura
`<bpalapura@potteranderson.com>; David Moore <dmoore@potteranderson.com>; Marek,
`Michelle <michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Richard Horwitz <rhorwitz@potteranderson.com>;
`Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>; Stephanie O'Byrne
`<sobyrne@potteranderson.com>; Lind, Matt <mattlind@paulhastings.com>; Laurenzi, Robert
`<robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>
`Cc: Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Kemper
`Diehl <KDiehl@susmangodfrey.com>; Max Straus <MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>;
`eormerod@skjlaw.com; nbelgam@skjlaw.com; Charla Clements <CClements@susmangodfrey.com>;
`Richard Wojtczak <rwojtczak@susmangodfrey.com>
`Subject: RE: Arendi v. Google/Motorola - financial information
`
`Beatrice –
`
`Google does not consent to your renewed request to share its sensitive financial information with
`your client. Please provide us with the authority that you would present to the court in support of
`your request. We can meet and confer once we have considered your authority.
`
`Regards,
`Chad
`
`
`From: Beatrice Franklin <BFranklin@susmangodfrey.com>
`Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 10:17 AM
`To: Peterman, Chad <chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>; Bindu Palapura
`<bpalapura@potteranderson.com>; David Moore <dmoore@potteranderson.com>; Marek,
`Michelle <michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Richard Horwitz <rhorwitz@potteranderson.com>;
`Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>; Stephanie O'Byrne
`<sobyrne@potteranderson.com>; Lind, Matt <mattlind@paulhastings.com>; Laurenzi, Robert
`<robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 216-1 Filed 08/28/20 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 6272
`
`Cc: Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Kemper
`Diehl <KDiehl@susmangodfrey.com>; Max Straus <MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>;
`eormerod@skjlaw.com; nbelgam@skjlaw.com; Charla Clements <CClements@susmangodfrey.com>;
`Richard Wojtczak <rwojtczak@susmangodfrey.com>
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Arendi v. Google/Motorola - financial information
`
`Counsel,
`
`Can you please let us know Google’s position, and if necessary some times you’re available to meet
`and confer today or tomorrow?
`
`Many thanks,
`Beatrice
`
`
`Beatrice Franklin | Susman Godfrey LLP
`212.729.2021 (o) | 617.710.7850 (c)
`
`From: Beatrice Franklin
`Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 9:29 AM
`To: Peterman, Chad <chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>; Bindu Palapura
`<bpalapura@potteranderson.com>; David Moore <dmoore@potteranderson.com>; Marek,
`Michelle <michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Richard Horwitz <rhorwitz@potteranderson.com>;
`Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>; Stephanie O'Byrne
`<sobyrne@potteranderson.com>; Lind, Matt <mattlind@paulhastings.com>; Laurenzi, Robert
`<robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>
`Cc: Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; John Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Kemper
`Diehl <KDiehl@susmangodfrey.com>; Max Straus <MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>;
`eormerod@skjlaw.com; nbelgam@skjlaw.com; Charla Clements <cclements@susmangodfrey.com>;
`Richard Wojtczak <rwojtczak@susmangodfrey.com>
`Subject: RE: Arendi v. Google/Motorola - financial information
`
`Counsel,
`
`Following up on the below, please let us know if Google still objects to sharing unit/user/download
`information with our client. If so, let us know some times you’re available this week to meet and
`confer so that we can promptly bring this issue to the Court’s attention.
`
`Many thanks,
`Beatrice
`
`
`Beatrice Franklin | Susman Godfrey LLP
`212.729.2021 (o) | 617.710.7850 (c)
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 216-1 Filed 08/28/20 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 6273
`
`From: Peterman, Chad <chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>
`Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 10:42 AM
`To: Beatrice Franklin <BFranklin@susmangodfrey.com>; Bindu Palapura
`<bpalapura@potteranderson.com>; David Moore <dmoore@potteranderson.com>; Marek,
`Michelle <michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Richard Horwitz <rhorwitz@potteranderson.com>;
`Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>; Stephanie O'Byrne
`<sobyrne@potteranderson.com>; Lind, Matt <mattlind@paulhastings.com>; Laurenzi, Robert
`<robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>
`Cc: Steve Susman <SSusman@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; John
`Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Kemper Diehl <KDiehl@susmangodfrey.com>; Max Straus
`<MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>; eormerod@skjlaw.com; nbelgam@skjlaw.com; Charla Clements
`<CClements@susmangodfrey.com>; Richard Wojtczak <rwojtczak@susmangodfrey.com>
`Subject: RE: Arendi v. Google/Motorola - financial information
`
`Beatrice –
`
`Google and Motorola do not authorize the disclosure of the documents cited in your email or other
`confidential financial information to Arendi. Please contact me if you have any questions.
`
`Regards,
`Chad
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Beatrice Franklin <BFranklin@susmangodfrey.com>
`Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2020 12:10 PM
`To: Bindu Palapura <bpalapura@potteranderson.com>; David Moore
`<dmoore@potteranderson.com>; Marek, Michelle <michellemarek@paulhastings.com>; Richard
`Horwitz <rhorwitz@potteranderson.com>; Unikel, Robert <robertunikel@paulhastings.com>;
`Stephanie O'Byrne <sobyrne@potteranderson.com>; Lind, Matt <mattlind@paulhastings.com>;
`Laurenzi, Robert <robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com>; Peterman, Chad
`<chadpeterman@paulhastings.com>
`Cc: Steve Susman <SSusman@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Seth Ard <sard@susmangodfrey.com>; John
`Lahad <jlahad@SusmanGodfrey.com>; Kemper Diehl <KDiehl@susmangodfrey.com>; Max Straus
`<MStraus@susmangodfrey.com>; eormerod@skjlaw.com; nbelgam@skjlaw.com; Charla Clements
`<CClements@susmangodfrey.com>; Richard Wojtczak <rwojtczak@susmangodfrey.com>
`Subject: [EXT] Arendi v. Google/Motorola - financial information
`
`Counsel,
`
`Please confirm that your clients have no objection to our sharing Google and Motorola’s unit
`sales/users and revenue for the Accused Products (reflected in, for example, MOTO00056571 and
`GOOG00157155, GOOG00157156, GOOG00157158) with our client.
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 216-1 Filed 08/28/20 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 6274
`
`
`Many thanks,
`Beatrice
`
`
`Beatrice Franklin | Susman Godfrey LLP
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor | New York, NY 10019
`212.729.2021 (office) | 617.710.7850 (cell)
`bfranklin@susmangodfrey.com| www.susmangodfrey.com
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
