throbber
Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 122 Filed 07/02/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 3422
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. and
`LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A.,
`INC.,
`
`
`C.A. No. 12-1595-LPS
`
`C.A. No. 12-1596-LPS
`
`C.A. No. 12-1599-LPS
`
`C.A. No. 12-1601-LPS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)))))))))))))
`
`))))))))))
`
`))))))))))
`
`))))))))))
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT MOBILE, INC.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
`f/k/a MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 122 Filed 07/02/19 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 3423
`
`C.A. No. 12-1602-LPS
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-LPS
`
`C.A. No. 13-920-LPS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`))))))))))))))
`
`))))))))))
`
`))))))))))
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA)
`INC., f/k/a SONY ERICSSON MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.,
`SONY CORPORATION and
`SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`OATH HOLDINGS INC. AND OATH INC.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), Defendants LG Electronics, Inc., LG
`
`Electronics USA, Inc., LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., Apple Inc., Microsoft Mobile,
`
`Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, f/k/a Motorola Mobility, Inc., Sony Mobile Communications
`
`(USA) Inc., f/k/a Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 122 Filed 07/02/19 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 3424
`
`Corporation of America, Google LLC, Oath Holdings Inc. and Oath Inc. (collectively,
`
`“Defendants”) hereby move the Court for entry of judgment on the pleadings in Defendants’
`
`favor, holding that all claims asserted by Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L. are invalid under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 101 as directed to patent-ineligible subject matter.
`
`
`
`The grounds for this motion are set forth in Defendants’ opening brief filed herewith.
`
`
`
`
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jeremy D. Anderson
`Jeremy D. Anderson (No. 4515)
`222 Delaware Avenue, 17th Floor
`P.O. Box 1114
`Wilmington, DE 19899-1114
`janderson@fr.com
`
`Attorney for Defendants LG Electronics,
`Inc.,LG Electronics USA, Inc. and
`LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.
`
`
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`
`/s/ Jeremy A. Tigan
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (No. 1014)
`Jeremy A. Tigan (No. 5239)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`jtigan@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Microsoft
`Mobile Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DLA PIPER LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ Denise S. Kraft
`Denise S. Kraft (No. 2778)
`Brian A. Biggs (No. 5591)
`Erin E. Larson (No. 6616)
`1201 North Market Street, Suite 2100
`Wilmington, DE 19801-3046
`Denise.kraft@dlapaper.com
`Brian.biggs@dlapiper.com
`erin.larson@dlapiper.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ David E. Moore
`David E. Moore (No. 3983)
`Bindu A. Palapura (No. 5370)
`Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
`1313 N. Market Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`dmoore@potteranderson.com
`bpalapura@potteranderson.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Motorola
`Mobility LLC, f/k/a Motorola Mobility, Inc.,
` and Defendant Google LLC
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 122 Filed 07/02/19 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 3425
`
`
`
`
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ Rodger D. Smith, II
`Rodger D. Smith, II (No. 3778)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`rsmith@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Sony Mobile
`Communications (USA) Inc., Sony
`Corporation and Sony Corporation of
`America
`
`July 2, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ Jack B. Blumenfeld
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (No. 1014)
`Anthony D. Raucci (No. 5948)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`araucci@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Oath Holdings Inc.
`and Oath Inc.
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 122 Filed 07/02/19 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 3426
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on July 2, 2019, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed with
`
`
`
`the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of such filing to all registered
`
`participants.
`
`
`
`I further certify that I caused copies of the foregoing document to be served on July 2,
`
`2019, upon the following in the manner indicated:
`
`Neal C. Belgam, Esquire
`Eve H. Ormerod, Esquire
`SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS, LLP
`800 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1000
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`John P. Lahad, Esquire
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`100 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, TX 77002
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Stephen D. Susman, Esquire
`Seth Ard, Esquire
`Max I. Straus, Esquire
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`
`
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jeremy A. Tigan
`
`
`
`
`Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket