throbber
Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 118 Filed 03/29/24 Page 1 of 4
`
`In the United States Court of Federal Claims
`No. 19-859
`(Filed: 29 March 2024)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`***************************************
`E-NUMERATE SOLUTIONS, INC., and
`*
`E-NUMERATE, LLC,
`*
`
`
`*
`
`Plaintiffs,
`*
`
`
`*
`v.
`
`*
`
`
`*
`THE UNITED STATES,
`*
`
`
`*
`
`Defendant.
`*
`
`
`*
`***************************************
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`HOLTE, Judge.
`
`On 14 March 2024, the parties filed a joint status report (JSR). JSR, ECF No. 117.
`Plaintiffs requested a status conference to address the following disputes: (1) whether the Court
`will set a trial date; (2) limits on number of claims/patents; (3) page limits on motion for
`summary judgment briefing; (4) limits on discovery; and (5) e-Numerate’s contention the
`government has failed to produce documents. JSR at 7. The Court accordingly sets the
`following limits on discovery and schedules an in-person status conference on 8 July 2024 at
`2:30 p.m. (ET) at the National Courts Building in Washington, DC, to discuss any remaining
`disputes or necessary adjustments to the schedule or discovery limits:
`
`(1) the Court will defer setting a trial date until a later time;
`(2) the Court will not limit the number of asserted claims, prior art references, or
`invalidity contentions at this time;
`(3) the Court will follow Rule 5.4 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal
`Claims (“RCFC”) for briefing limits;
`(4) the Court limits depositions to 140 hours per party (i.e., 140 collective hours for
`plaintiffs, and 140 collective hours for the government), all experts may be deposed by
`the opposing party for up to seven hours per report, and expert depositions will not count
`toward the total hours limit on depositions1;
`
`
`1 Under Judge Albright’s standing order governing patent proceedings, the presumptive limit for fact depositions is
`70 hours per side and seven hours per expert report. See Standing Order Governing Proceedings (OGP) 4.4—
`Patent Cases, at 3 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2024). The Court notes the large number of asserted claims in this case and
`the Court’s construction of 35 terms—almost three times the standing order’s presumed limit for seven patents. See
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 118 Filed 03/29/24 Page 2 of 4
`
`(5) the Court limits the requests for production to 75 per side2;
`(6) the Court will discuss plaintiffs’ scope of production contentions at the in-person
`status conference on 8 July 2024.
`
`The Parties SHALL FILE a joint status report on or before 1 July 2024 outlining:
`
`(1) plaintiff’s asserted claims as reduced 17 June 2024;
`(2) the government’s anticipated number of prior art references for deadline 15 July
`2024;
`(3) the government’s anticipated amendments to its infringement and invalidity
`contentions for deadline 5 August 2024;
`(4) the total count of documents and document images produced to date from each party;
`(5) a general summary of the collection, review, and production efforts since the start of
`fact discovery;
`(6) the volume of documents remaining to be reviewed, including an explanation of any
`extent to which the total volume remains unknown; and
`(7) a list of discussion items for each party in preparation for the 8 July 2024 status
`conference with the Court.
`
`
`The Court accordingly SETS the following schedule for further proceedings:
`
`EVENT
`Fact Discovery Opens & Initial Disclosures
`Served
`
`DEADLINE
`1 April 2024
`
`Deadline to Add Parties
`
`Deadline for Plaintiffs to reduce the number of
`asserted claims
`
`6 May 2024
`
`17 June 2024
`
`The parties shall file a JSR including the items
`outlined supra
`
`1 July 2024
`
`
`id. at 7. The Court accordingly finds 140 hours—twice the presumed limit—is an appropriate limit for depositions
`in this case. The Court will discuss these limits and any necessary scheduling adjustments at the in-person status
`conference on 8 July 2024 and anticipates plaintiffs reducing the number of asserted claims over the course of
`discovery.
`2 Judge Albright’s standing order similarly limits parties to 75 requests for production each. See id. at 3.
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 118 Filed 03/29/24 Page 3 of 4
`
`In-person status conference at the National
`Courts Building in Washington, DC
`
`8 July 2024 at 2:30 pm (ET)
`
`Deadline for Defendant to reduce the number
`of prior art references
`
`15 July 2024
`
`Final Infringement and Invalidity Contentions 5 August 2024
`
`Deadline to Amend Pleadings
`
`Meet and Confer on Claims
`Asserted/Invalidity Theories
`
`Close of Fact Discovery
`
`Opening Expert Reports
`
`12 August 2024
`
`19 August 2024
`
`1 October 2025
`
`8 January 2026
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports
`
`9 February 2026
`
`Reply Expert Reports
`
`12 March 2026
`
`Close of Expert Discovery
`
`Second Meet and Confer
`
`3 April 2026
`
`1 May 2026
`
`Deadline to file Dispositive Motions
`
`15 May 2026
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 118 Filed 03/29/24 Page 4 of 4
`
`Deadline to respond to any dispositive motions 12 June 2026
`
`Deadline to reply to any dispositive motions
`
`26 June 2026
`
`On 18 October 2022, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice with
`respect to Count VIII of plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 53. Joint Stipulation
`of Dismissal, ECF No. 101. In the Joint Stipulation, the parties indicated “on September 22,
`2022, the [U.S. Patent and Trademark Office] issued an ex parte reexamination certificate for
`[U.S. Patent No. 10,423,708] cancelling claims 1, 10, and 17, the only claims of the ’708 Patent
`asserted in this action.” Id. at 1. The parties stipulated and agreed to dismissal with prejudice of
`Count VIII of the Second Amended Complaint in which infringement of the ’708 Patent was
`alleged. Id. at 2. The Court accordingly GRANTS the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, ECF No.
`101, with prejudice as to Count VIII of the Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 53, with each
`party to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs as stipulated.
`
`As discussed supra, the Court schedules an in-person status conference on 8 July 2024 at
`2:30 p.m. (ET) at the National Courts Building in Washington, DC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Ryan T. Holte
`RYAN T. HOLTE
`Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket