`REPORT
`JD—CV-89 Rev. 743
`oo.s,i:49—31n;PA13»iss
`
`STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`SUPERIOR COURT
`WWW.judct. gov
`
`COURT’JSE ONLY
`
`lww—Ww
`WW
`
`
`
`
`.
`.......N;7‘n(: of?Q)S)0
`R‘etman'ev
`ra};U. \iumbu ..
`
`
`“EEWQRTQAGE INC V TIEZZI gflRlSTlNAM _
`MMXCV1860226788
`10/9/2018
`
`Wit-a
`intrirt
`am (i
`rr‘ia'or
`”
`WNW
`13;; t
`
`Middiesex
`uiNa‘fLLQ Ortiz
`m........................
`Baskets.
`
`1. Did the parties engage in conduct consistent with the obiectives of the mediation program?
`
`Plaintiff
`
`X Yes
`
`[3 No if no, explain:
`
`Defendant
`
`g3 Yes D No if no, explain:
`
`Did the parties possess the ability to mediate?
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Yes D No if no, explain:
`
`Defendant
`E Yes
`[3 No if no, explain:
`2. Did the mortgagor submit a complete financial package to the mortgagee?
`3. What foreclosure“alternativehas the mortgagor requested?
`fl Loan modification
`1: Repayment
`
`[j Reinstatement
`
`{:3 Short Sale
`: Deed-in-Lieu
`Cl Modification of sale date/law day
`4. Has the mortgagor been previously evaluated for a simiiar request?
`
`if yes, prior to mediation D
`In mediation [j
`lfyes, has there been a change in Circumstances since that evaluation?
`
`lf yes, explain:
`5. Has the mortgagee responded to the mortgagor‘s request?
`
`Description of the response:
`
`[:5 Approval
`
`{Xi Denial
`
`3 Yes E No
`
`{:1 Yes 2) No
`
`C] Yes [E No
`
`I”YesEM)
`
`[:3 Not Applicable
`
`Explain: The medgegeeaasunabiemteai2otoxe..ahy.l.os§mstationsloathsomemtsaiaadoeumentetiod
`is the mediator aware of any material reason to disagree with that response?
`
`D Yes El No
`
`if yes, explain:
`6. Has the mortgagor responded to the mortgagee‘s offer on a reasonably timely basis?
`
`[X] Yes E] No : Not Applicable
`
`Explain: The itiortcgagor will resubmit an entire new financial application.
`74 Has the mortgagee requested additional information from the mortgagor?
`
`If yes, what are the stated reasons for the request and by what date must the
`information be submitted so that all financials will remain current?
`
`{3 Yes [8 No
`
`8‘ Has the mortgagor supplied, or, a reasonably timely basis additional information reasonably
`requested by the mortgagee?
`if no, reason:
`
`C] Yes D No
`Not Applicable
`
`[3 Yes X} No
`9. is information provided by the mortgagor still current for the mortgagee’s review?
`if no, list the out-of date information and the reason it is no longer current: Agegtire new a;2plication_is_gec;essa[florist/Lew;
`“:0. Has the mortgagee provided a reasonable explanation ofa denial for the foreclosure alternative
`D Yes E] No
`requested?
`[gr Not Applicable
`
`is the mediator aware of any material reasons to disagree with the denial?
`
`Li Yes [E No
`
`if yes, explain:
`11. Has the mortgagee complied with the statutory time frames for responding to requests for decisions? E Yes C] No
`If no, explain:
`
`12. Did the parties satisfy the expectations set forth in the previous report?
`
`JD~CV—89 Rev. 7—?3
`
`Page for”?
`
`hilt
`
`
`
`MMXC V1860225 78S
`
`Plaintiff
`
`X Yes D No 3 NotAppiicabie
`
`
`
`0639 Mediation Held: 8/28/26 19
`
`Defendant(s)
`
`E: Yes
`
`{X No
`
`:3 NotApplicabie
`
`if no. explain: 'i'Ligmevdegendam did not provide agiflcjji‘ionaifloaurnenmiion requesteti
`
`is a subsequent mediation session expected :0 occur?
`
`3:] Yes 3 No C] Don't Know
`
`Describe the expectations for each party both prior to and for the next mediation session; if appiicabie:
`
`13. \Mii the parties benefit from further mediation?
`Additional comments:
`
`
`both names ac reed tmflueogiggnomer mediazioni
`
`E} Yes 3:} No
`
`This report was deiivered to each party to the mediation on:
`
`
`
`f'
`
`MediatorsSzgyéim‘)
`
`JG-CV-89 Rev. 7-13
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`