`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ORDER 435704
`
`O'CONNELL, DOUGLAS K, SUCCESSOR
`ADMINISTRATOR OF T
` V.
`CALDWELL, DANIEL J, FORMER
`ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ES Et Al
`
`JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD
` AT TORRINGTON
`
`6/4/2018
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDER REGARDING:
`05/29/2018 140.00 REQUEST
`
`The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby:
`
`ORDER: DENIED
`
`This motion is denied without prejudice. When issues of fact pertaining to a motion to dismiss are in
`dispute, the court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. Harrison, 264 Conn.
`829, 833 (2003); Standard Tallow Corp. v. Jowdy, 190 Conn. 48, 56 (1983); Bartlett v. Metropolitan
`District Commission, 125 Conn. App. 149, 155-56 (2010), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 913 (2011); Weihing
`v. Dodsworth, 100 Conn. App. 29, 38 (2007). This request, however, provides no argument as to why
`issues of fact relevant to the motion to dismiss are in dispute. Therefore, the request is denied without
`prejudice to being reclaimed if the requester provides a persuasive argument as why pertinent facts are
`in dispute.
`
`Judicial Notice (JDNO) was sent regarding this order.
`
`435704
`
`Judge: JOHN DAVID MOORE
`
`LLICV176016067S 6/4/2018
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`