throbber
DOCKET NO: HHDCV176082230S
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ORDER 434447
`
`KONOPKA, EWELINA Et Al
` V.
`CHICAGO SAM'S LLC. Et Al
`
`JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD
` AT HARTFORD
`
`3/23/2018
`
`ORDER
`
`The following order is entered in the above matter:
`
`ORDER:
`
`Complex Litigation Case Management Order under P.B. § 23-14
`
`1. Use the following procedures in place of any conflicting provisions of the Connecticut Practice Book.
`Otherwise, follow the Practice Book.
`2. Do not write to the judge. File motions. You may write to the court officer, but solely about
`scheduling.
`3. Place the docket number above on all motions, pleadings, and any other documents. The document
`must use the prefix assigned, for example “X07,” and must say “Superior Court, Complex Litigation
`Docket at Hartford” at the top.
`4. If a motion is unopposed, the title of the motion should begin with the word “unopposed.”
`5. File any objections to motions within 21 days of the date the motion was filed.
`6. File any reply to objections within 14 days of the date of the objection. Sur-replies or notices of
`supplemental authorities may not be filed without moving for and receiving permission.
`7. To obtain a ruling on a motion file a “request for adjudication” after the time for filing a reply has
`passed. Form JD-CL-77, is available on the judicial website, www.jud.ct.gov under “Forms.” Request
`adjudication no later than 30 days after the last permissible brief is filed. Motions and requests not
`claimed within this 30 day period will be deemed withdrawn.
`8. Only file a request for adjudication at the same time any motion is filed if the matter is unopposed or
`urgent. Contact the court officer at (860) 548-2737 or adam.harvey@jud.ct.gov to arrange for expedited
`rulings on urgent matters. Write to the court officer immediately if, for any reason, a motion no longer
`needs a ruling.
`9. The parties may not assert boilerplate discovery objections. A short plain statement of reasons must
`be given. Objections must explain why things are vague, present undue burdens, are overbroad, or are
`not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
`10. Do not file discovery objections or motions. The parties must serve timely discovery objections on
`their opponents but may not file them with the court. The parties must confer to try to resolve any
`dispute. If a dispute cannot be resolved, contact the court officer and schedule a telephone conference
`call or a court appearance. The court will hear and resolve the dispute on the record or indicate if any
`filings are needed.
`11. Except for good cause, no item will be received as case-in-chief evidence if the proponent has failed
`to produce it in response to a reasonable and proper discovery request covering the item, regardless of
`whether any discovery motion was made. Objections based upon vagueness, undue burden, overbreadth
`and relevance are not valid reasons for withholding requested materials actually known to counsel or a
`party representative responsible for the conduct of the litigation.
`12. If a dispute arises during a deposition counsel may attempt to arrange a telephone conference with
`the Court through the court officer at (860) 548-2737 or adam.harvey@jud.ct.gov. Any such conference
`should be attended by the same court reporter recording the deposition.
`13. Email the court officer a Microsoft Word version of the briefs on any dispositive motion.
`14. A case management conference is scheduled for April 9, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. in courtroom 409. Do not
`HHDCV176082230S 3/23/2018
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`serve any additional discovery before the conference. Be ready for the court to craft a complex litigation
`discovery order at the conference.
`15. File a joint case management report 5 days before the initial conference:
`a. The plaintiffs should describe all claims in no more than 100-words.
`b. The defendants should describe all defenses in no more than 100-words.
`c. The parties should separately describe any pending motions to resolve and any dispositive motions
`they wish to file.
`d. The parties should also separately estimate the number of witnesses and describe needed discovery,
`specifically what kinds of things they seek to discover and how they wish to discover it—i.e., by
`interrogatories, production and depositions.
`e. The parties should, jointly if possible and separately if necessary, propose a firm-case management
`schedule adjusting as needed any prior schedules, including: a date to complete discovery, to file
`dispositive motions, to disclose and depose experts, and to begin trial. Do not use either form JD-
`CV-141 or JD-CV-71 for this purpose. The parties’ proposed dates should be contained within the case
`management report.
`
`Judicial Notice (JDNO) was sent regarding this order.
`
`434447
`
`Judge: THOMAS G MOUKAWSHER
`Processed by: Adam Harvey
`
`HHDCV176082230S 3/23/2018
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket