`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ORDER 433230
`
`RAY, NAOMI
`
` V.
`NEYRA, MD, HAROLD D.
`
`JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD
` AT STAMFORD
`
`2/19/2019
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDER REGARDING:
`09/05/2018 118.00 OBJECTION TO MOTION OR REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY PB CH13
`
`The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby:
`
`ORDER: SCHEDULE ARGUMENT
`
`The court is scheduling argument for March 4, 2019.
`No later than 5 PM on the Thursday before argument, each party shall file a pleading/report identifying
`each issue that remains in dispute, the filing party's position with respect to that issue, and the filing
`party's understanding of the opposing party's position as to that issue. This applies to all outstanding
`discovery issues; the failure to identify an issue and comply with this order relating to any request will
`be deemed a waiver of the right to challenge the adverse party's position.
`The court will be prepared to impose sanctions for a party's failure to attempt to resolve these disputes in
`
`a good faith manner; see, Practice Book § 13-8(b) and § 13-10(h).
`
`Judicial Notice (JDNO) was sent regarding this order.
`
`433230
`
`Judge: KENNETH B POVODATOR
`Processed by: Eileen Condron
`
`This document may be signed or verified electronically and has the same validity and status as a document with a physical
`(pen-to-paper) signature. For more information, see Section I.E. of the State of Connecticut Superior Court E-Services
`Procedures and Technical Standards (https://jud.ct.gov/external/super/E-Services/e-standards.pdf), section 51-193c of the
`Connecticut General Statutes and Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-4.
`
`FSTCV186035934S 2/19/2019
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
