`REPORT
`JD-CV—89 Rev. 7-13
`C.G.S. D 49-31n; P.A. 13-136
`
`STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`SUPERIOR COURT
`wwwyud. ct. gov
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`WHEN”
`
`Doc et Number
`
`Name of Case
`
`
`US. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR
`HAR V. MARAJ JANUSZ
`udicra Ilstnct
`ame ofMediator
`'
`
`e-ratron e
`Date
`
`
`
`
`Stamford
`Y. Julia Xia
`6/1/2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FSTCV1760338308
`
`
`Return Date
`11/14/2017
`
`
`
`1. Did the parties engage in conduct consistent with the objectives of the mediation program?
`
`Plaintiff
`
`[X] Yes
`
`1:] No if no, explain:
`
`X No if no, explain: Subseguent to the previous mediation session on 13/16/2018, borrower did
`[:1 Yes
`- Defendant
`not apply for EMAP as expected.
`'
`
`Did the parties possess the ability to mediate?
`
`Plaintiff
`
`X Yes
`
`D No If no, explain:
`
`Defendant
`
`IE Yes D No If no, explain:
`
`_
`
`2. Did the mortgagor submit a complete financial package. to the mortgagee?
`
`D Yes
`
`No
`
`If no, explain: Plaintiff previously completed a review and issued a denial for home retention options. This denial was
`discussed during the previous mediation session on‘ 3/16/2018.
`
`At this time borrower must decide how he wishes to proceed.
`
`3. What foreclosure alternative has the mortgagor requested?
`
`1:] Loan modification
`
`E] Repayment
`
`E] Reinstatement
`
`|:] Modification of sale date/law day
`|:I Deed—in-Lieu
`[1 Short Sale
`4. Has the mortgagor been previously evaluated for a similar request?
`If yes, prior to mediation E]
`In mediation [I
`
`If yes, has there been a change in circumstances since that evaluation?
`
`El Yes I] No
`
`E] Yes D No
`
`if yes, explain:
`
`5. Has the mortgagee responded to the mortgagor‘s request?
`Description of the response:
`E] Approval
`E] Denial
`Explain:
`
`|:I Yes |:] No Q Not Applicable
`
`Is the mediator aware of any material reason to disagree with that response?
`
`|:I Yes I: No
`
`If yes, explain:
`
`6. Has the mortgagor responded to the mortgagee's offer on a reasonably timely basis?
`
`[3 Yes E] No
`
`Not Applicable
`
`Explain:
`
`7. Has the mortgagee requested additional information from the mortgagor?
`
`Yes E] No
`
`If yes, what are the stated reasons for the request and by what date must the
`information be submitted so that all financials will remain current?
`
`Borrower expects to submit a EMAP application; borrower may consider liquidation options.
`
`8. Has the mortgagor supplied, on a reasonably timely basis, additional information reasonably
`requested by the mortgagee?
`If no, reason:
`
`1:] Yes 1:] No
`Not Applicable
`
`9. Is information provided by the mortgagor still current for the mortgagee's review?
`
`1:} Yes
`
`No
`
`If no, list the out-of date information and the reason it is no longer current:
`
`10. Has the mortgagee provided a reasonable explanation of a denial for the foreclosure alternative
`'equefied?
`Is the mediator aware of any material reasons to disagree with the denial?
`
`if yes, explain:
`
`JD-CV-89 Rev. 7-13
`
`.
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`IIO-OD
`
`E] Yes D No
`[X] Not Applicable
`D Yes E] No
`
`x,
`
`
`
`FSTCV17603383OS
`
`.
`
`.
`
`-
`
`Date Mediation Held: 6/1/2018
`
`11. Has the mortgagee complied with the statutory time frames for responding to requests for decisions?
`If no, explain: M
`I
`
`.
`
`[:1 Yes 1:] No
`
`12. Did the parties satisfy the expectations set forth in the previous report?
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant(s)
`
`If no. explain:
`
`g Yes
`
`|:] No
`
`C] Not Applicable
`
`D Yes E No
`
`|:] Not Applicable
`
`Is a subsequent mediation session expected‘to occur?
`
`E] Yes [:1 No x Don't Know
`
`Describe the expectations for each party both prior to and for the next mediation session, if applicable:
`
`,
`
`See comments to Question 7.
`13. Vlfill the parties benefit from further mediation?
`Additional comments:
`
`Additional mediation will onl be beneficial if borrower wishes to discuss li uidation o tions.
`
`This report was delivered to each party to the mediation on:
`
`Caz I (29/?
`(Date)
`
`XI Yes D No
`
`
`
`5 Signature
`
`
`
`JD-CV-89 Rev. 7-13
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`